Our Holy Dwelling- Ephesians 2:19-22

Ephesians 2:19-22

Paul brings his discussion on the grace of God in bringing the Gentiles “near” to a close in stating that the Gentiles are no longer “strangers and aliens” (2:19). The use of “strangers” should move the reader back to the beginning of Paul’s venture into this area of the Gentile in 2:12, speaking of them as being xenos “to the covenants of promise.” By faith, the never-before creation of “one new man” changes their status forever in Christ. Robertson translates this as “sojourners,” which he says is an “old word for dweller by (near by, but not in). Dwellers just outside the house or family of God.” “Aliens” is used rarely in the New Testament (Acts 7:6, 29; 1 Peter 2:11), speaking of “someone who had taken up residence in a place but who had never become a naturalized citizen; such people paid a tax for the privilege of existing in a land which was not their own.” We can only understand the seriousness of this exposition when we compare it against the revelation that God had graciously given to Israel (Acts 7:2-38; Rom 9:3-5). However, we see that it is their failure to serve as a beacon to the nations that has brought about the ministry of Christ in reconciling the world unto Himself (Lev 19:12; 22:32; Jer 34:16; Ezek 36:20-23; 2 Cor 5:19). In communicating through the prophet Moses, God had made the mission of Israel clear:

See, I have taught you statutes and judgments just as the Lord my God commanded me, that you should do thus in the land where you are entering to possess it. So keep and do them, for that is your wisdom and your understanding in the sight of the peoples who will hear all these statutes and say, ‘Surely this great nation is a wise and understanding people.’ For what great nation is there that has a god so near to it as is the Lord our God whenever we call on Him? Or what great nation is there that has statutes and judgments as righteous as this whole law which I am setting before you today? (Deut 4:5-8).

Israel’s culture was designed intentionally for the purpose of attracting the nations to the righteous character of YHWH Elohim. In doing so, they would serve as God’s mouthpiece; His megaphone to the nations announcing His goodness and His grace. The Gentiles were just right outside of the camp in every direction, in desperate need of the Creator God of the universe. Israel’s failure in chasing after idols rendered the completion of their mission ineffective, despite the bright spots of obedience and faithfulness peppered throughout the biblical record. Thus, the blood of Christ has spoken to them, being the effectual, transportive agent (Eph 2:13c), inviting all who will to come and receive the free gift of eternal life (John 6:47; Heb 2:9; Rev 22:17).

In believing in Christ, Gentiles were now granted a considerable contrast, with the apostle using two designations to speak of their acceptance in Christ. First, he describes them as “fellow citizens” which is “sympoliteai.” This is the only occurrence of this word in the New Testament. Concerning the interpretation, Louw and Nida note that this word, “may also be rendered as ‘you join with God’s people as fellow citizens together with them’ or ‘you and God’s people are all persons who belong to the same place’ or as in some languages, ‘… people of God’s country.’” While Robertson believes that this is the Gentile’s inclusion into Israel (see his notes on 2:19), this would obviously thwart Paul’s entire point of the Father establishing the two (Jew and Gentile) into “one new man” in Ephesians 2:15b. Paul understands that God is not seeking to pour the “new man” into the old wineskin of Israel. God’s intention, and the very power of the shed blood of Jesus is to create a new community in the Son. As Hoehner notes, “In the context Paul was discussing the ‘one new man’ (v. 15), the ‘one body’ (v. 16). This does not mean that Gentiles are incorporated into Israel but that believing Jews and Gentiles are incorporated into one new ‘humanity.’” Paul is clear. The Gentiles have been brought into a “fellow citizenship” with the “saints and members of the household of God” (2:19), a citizenship that is brand-new in all aspects: the Ecclesia of God.

It is concerning that the text of Scripture has not been allowed to speak for itself on this matter of the “one new man” (Eph 2:15c) and believing Gentiles now being “fellow citizens” alongside believing Jews in Christ. For instance, Merkle writes, “Paul is declaring that believers who were once considered foreigners are now, along with other believers (“the saints”), citizens in God’s kingdom (cf. Phil 3:20). Gentile believers now have a homeland and are therefore fellow citizens of God’s heavenly kingdom” (emphasis added). This should cause us to pause and consider the context. When the apostle speaks of the “one new man” for Jew and Gentile, is he speaking about “God’s kingdom?” Is this what Paul meant when he penned this epistle? While many have confused the Church and the Kingdom, it is plain to see that this is not Paul’s understanding of the matter. As will be unfolded in chapter 3 of Ephesians, the Church was not previously revealed in Old Testament times, but is designated as a “mystery” (Eph 3:2-7), meaning that it was in God’s plan all along, but was held from our knowledge until the time of His perfect choosing, being the Day of Pentecost in Acts 2 (See also Acts 15:10-12). The “kingdom” is something that the Church will have a share in, but from Paul’s only use of the word in Ephesians occurring at 5:5, we can confidently conclude that this is something that is out-ahead and not a subject that is presently under consideration, either in Ephesians 2:19, or in the Church Dispensation.

It is important to think about the concept of one being a “fellow citizen.” Just as one who is a citizen of the United States has the right to vote, secure a driver’s license, take part in Social Security, etc., so also those who are believers in the one true God through Christ Jesus our Lord are afforded rights and benefits that come with that citizenship. We know from Ephesians 1:3-14 that there are a wide array of benefits that come from simply being “in Christ” that were not possible when we were separated from Him. But now, in Christ, every spiritual blessing is presently and forever ours. In fact, John the Apostle has written of this “right” of the citizen in his Gospel. He writes:

But as many as received Him, to them He gave the right to become children of God, even to those who believe in His name, who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God (John 1:12-13, emphasis added).

Notice that it is only those who receive Him. To receive Christ is to believe on His Name, just as John tells us in the verse. In believing, we are now given “the right” to become children of God, which can also be understood as the “authority” or “power” to be God’s children. Our citizenship, stamped in Christ’s precious blood, has conferred “full rights” upon us in Christ Jesus.

The designation “with the saints” (Eph 2:19b) could be considered as a designation that Paul is giving to these Gentile believers, but this is not his direct point, even though it is true. Paul is noting that these Gentiles are “fellow citizens with the saints” just as the saints are fellow citizens with believing Gentiles. As discussed previously regarding Ephesians 1:1, 4, 13, 15, and 18, this term speaks of “holy ones,” being those whom God has set aside specifically because of the blood of Christ. Once again, a plain, literal understanding of the word meets opposition at the hands of its interpreters. Arnold explains:

There has been much discussion about whom Paul intends to refer to when he uses the word “saints” in this context. Some have suggested that he is referring to the Jewish people (Israel), others that he is referring to the redeemed of all ages, others to Jewish Christians, and still others that he is speaking of angels, or even angels in addition to the redeemed of all ages. Because Paul consistently uses “saints” to refer to both Jewish and Gentile Christians throughout this letter (see on 1:1), it is best to take it as a reference to Christians.

Since the text states “with the saints,” a subsection of people could be under consideration, but Paul’s point is being driven home about the lack of inferiority regarding the Gentiles in the “one new man.” Arnold’s assessment is the best way to think about this verse.

Second, the phrase “the household of God” should also be considered, being Paul’s third designation for the Gentiles being brought into the “one new man” in Christ. This word is oikeios being a familial term. BDAG understands “household” as “persons who are related by kinship or circumstances and form a closely knit group, members of a household.” Gentiles and Jews are now in a united, familial community with God the Father presiding over it, and Christ Jesus, our brother, serving as its Head (Col 1:18). The close-knit nature found in Paul’s use of “household” can be seen in 1 Timothy 5:8 where Paul writes, “But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.” Here, the word is used to speak of a believer’s genetic family, having been entrusted to his care. This further enhances the use of such terms as “brothers and sisters” when we speak of those whom we fellowship with and worship alongside. We are a unified, family unit of believers in Christ, with believing Gentiles now holding the same rights, relations, and privileges as those of the believing Jews.

This equal and glorious status for the believer in Christ is truly by grace. Whereas the Jew could boast in their fleshly markings (Eph 2:11b), their promised Deliverer, their rich heritage of blessing, the contractual commitment given them by YHWH Himself, their guaranteed future, and their blessing of YHWH’s never-moving hand upon them (Eph 2:12), all such blessings are earthly in nature. Chafer notes that being a fellow citizen in God’s household is “a blessing which, it should be observed, is as much higher than the commonwealth and covenant privileges of Israel as heaven is higher than the earth. Though once excluded from the earthly Jerusalem, the Gentiles are now come with a gracious welcome to the heavenly Jerusalem (Heb. 12:22–24), in which city, the unregenerate Jew, with all his national preference and title to earthly Jerusalem, is an alien.” As a brand-new community, the calling and status of believers is higher. The Law of Christ is greater (Gal 6:2). The Spirit indwelling is superior! In Christ, the veil is torn and access to the Father is full and final (Mark 15:38; Luke 23:45; Heb 4:16).

As with any house, and equally as with any household, there needs to be a foundation that is laid in order to stabilize the structure. One’s house is only as strong as its foundation, just as one’s family is only as strong as its foundation. Hoehner notes that the grammar here may point to a cause, “namely, the reason we are fellow citizens with the saints and members of God’s household is because we have been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets. The passive emphasizes that we who are in one body are recipients of the action.” This shouldn’t be surprising to us because up to this point, the Apostle Paul has not asked anything of his readers in the truths that he has communicated to them. Instance after instance of blessing after blessing has been communicated, which has all been secured by the perfect, all-sufficient work of Jesus Christ in His death and resurrection, and has been freely given to all who simply believe in Him. Every believer who reads the Epistle to the Ephesians finds themselves in the act of receiving a thorough knowledge of the blessings that have already been in place since the moment that they first believed in Christ! Ephesians 1-3 find us observing carefully, and understanding more thoroughly, all that is already ours in Christ.

While we are told in 1 Corinthians 3:11 that the foundation for sound doctrine is Christ Jesus (see 1 Cor 3:1-2 for the context), Ephesians tells us that the foundation of the household of God (the Church) is the apostles and the prophets. The phrase “apostles and prophets” is used three times in Ephesians (2:20; 3:5; 4:11), with 3:5 echoing the same sentiments as 2:20, and 4:11 being understood in the same manner, but it is found alongside the other gifts of officers in the church of “evangelists, pastors, and teachers.” When combined with their corresponding contexts, it is clear that Paul’s use of this phrase speaks to the current dispensation, though this should not be understood as prophets of “the new Israel” as Wood concludes. Whereas we may automatically consider the idea of “prophets” as a subject residing predominately (or even strictly) in the Old Testament, this would not be compatible with the New Testament. As Simpson notes, “both nouns are governed by one article and joined together with kai. Since both nouns are plural the groups are either distinct or overlapping (i.e., apostles, prophets, and some who are both), with is the likely case.”

Adams agrees with the context promoting a current constituency that Paul intends in using this phrase, writing “the founding of the Church’s congregations and its divine revelation came from apostles and prophets (men like Mark and Luke who, though not apostles, nevertheless were recipients of revelation—see 3:5).” Those that we would understand as New Testament prophets would be those who have the spiritual gift of prophecy (Acts 21:9-10; 1 Cor 14:1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 22, 24, 29, 31, 32, 37, 39). When the apostle speaks of the Lord’s first century appointments for the health of the Church, he lists “apostles” as first and “prophets” as second (1 Cor 12:28). While it will be discussed in the comments regarding Ephesians 4:11, and while “apostles and prophets” are also found in other various forms and groupings throughout the New Testament (2 Pet 3:2; Rev 18:20, for instance), it would suffice to say that these two offices have passed off the scene, seeing that the foundation for sound teaching has already been laid and one dare not lay it again and so collapse the superstructure. Beal and Radmacher state that, “The gift was essential at a time when the revelation of the New Testament was far from complete. The gift of prophecy often includes foretelling (Acts 11:28; 21:10-11), but not necessarily.” I believe that these New Testament occurrences are due to the unfinished nature of the New Testament canon in the midst of the first century. Now that we have a completed revelation from God as found in His Word, the office of prophet is no longer necessary. All that God would want us to know is found in His truth.

In the Old Testament, the prophets were given for the express purpose of revealing God’s truth in general, and for calling the nation of Israel back into the requirements of their covenant relationship with YHWH in particular. Having general revelation but little to no written revelation, these heralds served in the high capacity as the mouthpiece of YHWH’s choosing. When we look at the blessings and curses in Deuteronomy 28:1-29:68 much of what the prophets were dealing with consisted of the repercussions of cursing that had come upon Israel as God had promised due to their disobedience in regard to their covenant relationship with Him. The prophets announced that He would bring about judgment for their continual disobedience and called them to repentance. The same type of ministry is seen in the New Testament, with God revealing His will to this “one new man.”

The apostles (Luke 6:13) served as Christ’s messengers of truth, both to Israel in regards to the offer of the Kingdom (Matt 10:1-42), and in communicating the gospel of God’s grace as seen in the death of Christ for sin (1 Cor 15:2-4), which they were commissioned to preach in Acts 1:8. An apostle is “a group of highly honored believers with a special function as God’s envoys,” with its secular meaning having to do with ships that were ready to leave a port, having been sent out on a mission. There would be little question regarding the divine nature of the commissioning of an apostle as found in the Scriptures.

An apostle is one who is ‘sent’ by Jesus Christ. The word is used to refer especially to the inner circle of Christ’s twelve disciples, but is also used specifically to refer to Paul, who was commissioned as an apostle by the risen Christ. The term is also applied more loosely to certain other leading Christians in the NT period.”

The New Testament evidence points to an apostle as being commissioned by the resurrected Lord Jesus with the specific task of serving as His witnesses locally, nationally, and internationally. When appointing Matthias to fill the vacated place of Judas Iscariot, Peter states that “it is necessary that of the men who have accompanied us all the time that the Lord Jesus went in and out among us— beginning with the baptism of John until the day that He was taken up from us—one of these must become a witness with us of His resurrection” (Acts 1:21-22). This means that an “apostle,” from a biblical standpoint, must be one who was present between Jesus’ baptism and His ascension. No one today meets this absolute. With the commissioning of Matthias quickly came the power of the Holy Spirit that was working mightily in them to authenticate the message being presented (Acts 2:3-4; 3:6-8; 4:33; 5:5, 10, 12). As with the prophets, we see that a completion of New Testament truth renders the office of an apostle as unnecessary, having served out its purpose.

The cornerstone of this grand superstructure is the Lord Jesus Christ! Larry Moyer relates that the cornerstone is “the most important foundational stone in [the] building. Placed at the intersection of two walls, it aligns the building and holds it together.” With cornerstones being used in structures that we see in today’s world, we can observe that they serve as the starting point of a building, being dated to commemorate its erection, and singled out due to its indispensable nature in relation to the whole. Christ, being the cornerstone of this new building (Eph 2:21a), is certainly “essential, indispensable, and basic” to all that the Church does. Apart from Christ, the Church not only loses its identity, but its power. It is the resurrecting power of God as demonstrated in Christ that raises the Church spiritually and serves the Church in calling the unregenerate to believe in Jesus.

All that the Church does should have its starting place in the Corner stone. If the ministry that you are involved in has nothing to do with Christ, it doesn’t need a reassessment. It needs a funeral. Without Jesus as our centerpiece, there will be no eternal impact in the lives of people and God will receive no glory at all. Our motivations for ministry are connected and find their beginning in the Person of Jesus Christ our Lord. If we were to remove the Cornerstone from your Church, would it stand?

The superstructure of God being founded upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, and especially with Jesus Christ serving as the Cornerstone finds further explanation in 2:21a where Paul states that the “whole building” is “fitted together” in Christ (He is the “in whom” in Eph 2:21a). This serves as essential imagery to our understanding of Christ’s importance. Wood writes, “The function of the cornerstone (v. 20) is precisely defined by the verb ‘joined together’ (synarmologoumenē), found only here and in Ephesians 4:16 in the NT. It embraces the complicated process of masonry by which stones are fitted together.” The idea of being “fit” together is conveyed and demonstrates that the Church as a whole (universally) is cemented and fastened into the Cornerstone which is our Lord. This connection is obviously essential, but it is also equally permanent. Should the superstructure operate as though the Cornerstone were not present, it would not change the reality that it is there. Though the Church be entrenched in fantasy, the Lord Jesus remains a constant reality. Radmacher writes that:

Christ Himself was the Chief Cornerstone, from which all the lines of the building would be aligned and squared. He would be the focal point that would give direction to the building. So He shaped those foundational stones, the apostles and prophets (see Ephesians 2:20). Then he left it to the evangelists, pastors, and teachers to lead in the program of upbuilding, of shaping the living stones until the completion of the Body. Then this body would be presented without fault, without distortion, a holy temple unto the Lord.

God’s building “growing into” a “holy temple in the Lord” (Eph 2:21b). This is purposeful language. All of the ministry, teaching, prayer, and activity of the Church is to be connected to the Cornerstone, but the walls of this temple are to grow. The Church is not to be a stagnant, ancient, run down ruin that serves in reminiscing, or a “marvelous structure” that is only useful for taking pictures. It is to expand and grow into the direction of a holy temple in the Lord. With the membership of the early Church being Jewish up until the conversion of Cornelius (Acts 10:44-45) and the missionary efforts of those from Cyprus and Cyrene who preached Jesus to the Gentiles in Antioch (Acts 11:19-21), the use of the word “temple” would be something that connected with the Jewish mind due to the precise nature of the word utilized (Eph 2:21b). The significance of this usage may not be readily apparent when read in an English translation. David Spurbeck writes:

In the Greek New Testament there are two words that are translated “temple.” Each has its own significance. One, hieron, describes the whole temple complex with its courts, walls, barns, quarters and auxiliary rooms as well as the actual temple structure itself with the holy place and the holy of holies. The second term, naos, describes the focal point of all religious activity, the holy of holies. This term was used to describe the place where God’s presence was manifested. It is the second term that is found here.

The “holy of holies” is also known as the “most holy place” where the Ark of the Covenant was kept and where the Shekinah Glory of God dwelled above it. It was the innermost room in the Temple and was separated from the other areas by a thick curtain (Heb 9:1-12 shows the importance of Christ in this situation). Paul’s imagery here shows us that the Temple is no longer regulated to a building, but to a people: the Church. God is pleased to dwell in the midst of the saints and to be glorified in their worship. Gone are the days of limited access and ritualistic requirements for approaching the Most High because all has been satisfied in Christ Jesus our Lord. In the Church, we are joined together (one new man, one Body) and we are to grow into a holy (set apart) temple in the Lord!

Paul states in Ephesians 2:22 that in Christ, the saints “are being built together” into a place where God will dwell in the Spirit. The use of “in whom” points again to Jesus, our Corner stone. The verb form of “are being built” in Ephesians 2:22 is passive, present tense meaning that this is something that is being done now by God and is not something that we must enact, conjure, create, or do. God, through the Holy Spirit, is doing a great work in the Church! He is actively working. In fact, He is doing a perfect work for He can do no less. Knowing this truth, why would we not want to join Him in His work? Joining Him in what He is doing is how we properly respond to His work. I believe that this is the ultimate reason for the passive form of the verb in 2:22. Paul’s readers must first understand the fact that the Lord is doing something supernaturally astounding, which should persuade us to fall in line with God’s perfect working. In doing so, the Source of our strength and direction is clear, leading us to maturity (Eph 4:11-16).

If the notion of 2:21 shows that the one new man is “growing into a holy temple in the Lord,” this explanation is further enhanced moving beyond the Jewish imagery. Believing Jews and Gentiles are being built together into a “dwelling of God.” The word “dwelling” is katoiketerion meaning a place of habitation, which should not seem unusual. John uses this word in Revelation 18:2 to speak of the demons and unclean spirits that will inhabit Babylon at the end of the Tribulation. The idea is that the assembly of the saints is a sanctuary, being not a building with a name, but a conglomerate people who have the Spirit indwelling. May this lofty call strike us with the beauty of divine grace, with our Father graciously growing His children into grand structure that would topple the Parthenons of the world. May we rethink our alliances as the assembly of our Lord. May we take into account the pieces of the world that have become welcome staples in the worship and message of the Church. Has the holy temple, the “dwelling of God in the Spirit” entangled itself with alliances that are slowly poisoning the purity of Christ’s Body? May we recognize any departures into Bible-less customs and may we return again to the feet of our Christ and King.

A few final thoughts are in order. Primarily, as we saw a flash of the Trinity in Ephesians 2:18, so again does He appear in 2:22. In Christ, believers are being built together into a habitation of the Father in (“through”) the Spirit. Christ’s deliverance into a new location takes first place, with the dwelling being with the Father and this is only possible by the new life that is imparted by the Spirit unto believing subjects of which He then indwells them until the Rapture (2 Thess 2:7).

Second, the language of Paul’s pummeling of the benefits and blessings that are freely bestowed to those who are in Christ has not let up one bit since Ephesians 1:3. Every verse invokes high thoughts. Every passage adds another precious layer. Each turn holds a new landscape to embrace. The depths of the Body of Christ are staggering. While many have made the mistake of personalizing the promises of Ephesians and stopping there, Paul is overlooking all individual believers in favor of the whole! “Believers are integrated into the body of Christ, made a living part of something far larger than themselves. No individual Christian can fulfill God’s purposes in his or her life without contributing to the life and ministry of that body.” May we come to our senses regarding the corporate nature of the Church as being God’s plan and habitation for reaching a dying world and forsake individualized Christianity.

Chapter 2 is a sweeping landscape of heavenly truths! Beginning with the low estate of being “dead in trespasses and sins” (Eph 2:1) changing tracks completely by God’s doing in making us alive by His grace (Eph 2:4-5), granting us not just resurrection, but ascension and royal placement in the heavenlies (Eph 2:6), with the future aion (“age”) awaiting our display unto the seen and unseen as objects who have “the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness” (Eph 2:7) all due to the selfless Son of God laying down His divine life for the world (John 1:29). This chapter ends with the extent of God’s grace being shown in His reaching out for a people who had previously no preliminary pathways to this eternal rescue (Eph 2:11-12). But Jesus has bridged the gap, destroyed the hindrance of the Law, and paved a pathway by His blood, making peace and giving us access to God by the Holy Spirit (Eph 2:13-18). Believing Jews and Gentiles now have equal footing, acceptance, and glorious habitation with God because of the Son (Eph 2:19-22).

Though great in length, Darby’s thoughts on the heavenly position of the Church are a welcome addition to the blessed discourse of the Apostle Paul. He writes:

As to us, it is in the "heavenly places" that we shall find our abode. The spiritual blessings in heavenly places which we enjoy even now in hope, though hindered in many ways, will be for us, in that day, things natural to our physical and normal state, so to speak; but the earth will not fail to feel the effects of it. "Wicked spirits in heavenly places" (see margin, Eph 6:12), whose place will be then filled by Christ and His church, will cease to be the continual and prolific causes of the misery of a world subjected to their power by sin. The church, on the contrary, with Christ, reflecting the glory in which she participates, and enjoying the presence of Him who is at once to her its source and fulness, will beam upon the earth in blessing; and the nations will walk by her light - "help meet for him" (Gen 2:18) in His glory, full of thoughts of her beloved, and enjoying His love, she will be the worthy and happy instrument of His blessings; whilst, in her condition, she will be the living demonstration of their success. For God has done these things, "that in the ages to come he might show the exceeding riches of his grace in his kindness towards us through Christ Jesus," Eph 2:7. The earth will enjoy the fruits of the victory and of the faithfulness of the last Adam, and will be the magnificent testimony of it in the sight of principalities and powers, as it is at present, in the chaos made by sin, of the ruin and of the iniquity of the first Adam. Without doubt, the crowning joy - the joy of joys - will be the communion of the Father and of the Bridegroom; but to be witness of His goodness, to have part in it, and to be an instrument of it towards a fallen world, will certainly be to taste of divine joys, for "God is love."

May our minds be directed away from buildings and steeples, and instead take joy in the understanding that people matter to God, both for His glory and to fulfill His purposes. His desire is to dwell with us in constant fellowship, both now and in the heavenlies after the Rapture. He desires us to fully experience His grace. This certainly shows His tremendous love for the Church. Ask yourself, are we hindering the experience of total joy within the Body of Christ that Paul illustrates in this chapter? Are we weak bricks in the walls of His household due to ongoing, unconfessed sin? Have we lost sight of the Cornerstone? Have we forsaken the foundation laid by the apostles and prophets? All of these things are a reality that God has designed, initiated, and will see through to the final victory. To live apart from them is to live in the shadows of His determined plan.

JESUS: Our Peace- Ephesians 2:14-18

Ephesians 2:14-15

Being brought near by the blood of Christ (Eph 2:13b), Gentiles now stand with Jews on a brand-new, equal footing. This ground is brand-new because it is not a continuation of God’s previous dealings with the nation of Israel. This also means that Jews cannot stay in their Judaism, but having believed on their Messiah, are now placed within this new entity alongside the believing Gentile. This is equal footing. Previous identities are cast away with both believing parties gaining a new identity in Christ Jesus. The Spirit of God now indwells, Christ’s payment is applied, and life eternal is now the possession of the Christian with life abundant waiting perfectly in the wings. The stratosphere of blessings in Christ continues to unfold in Ephesians, showing the unique nature of the Church in this present dispensation. Darby writes, “So we see that the portion and position of the church are heavenly. It is inasmuch as dead and risen with Christ from the dead, that she enjoys all His privileges. It is there above that she enjoys them. She is heavenly by the very fact of her existence.” Jews do not become Gentiles, nor do Gentiles become Jews, just as the nations do not become Israel and Israel is certainly separate from the nations (Deut 7:6; 14:2). The blood of the Lord Jesus unites those who were previously asunder, and He does so with newness of life, placing them in a newness of location (“in Christ”- Eph 1:3, 7, 13), and a newness of Being (Christ’s Body- Eph 4:4a; Col 1:18).

In 2:14 we see that this verse begins with the conjunction “for” (gar), which expounds upon a general subject that has been previously stated. Paul must unpack the effectual nature of Jesus Christ and His blood. This warrants some initial observations. First, we see that Jesus Himself is our peace. Paul uses the personal inclusive pronoun (PIP) again, signifying the unifying nature and equal application. We must try and capture exactly what Paul is saying. Jesus IS our peace, which means that “peace” is a person. This is how Paul thought about the Savior. Lenski writes:

The predicate is ordinarily without the article, but when it has the article, the predicate is identical and interchangeable with the subject. It is so here. To name Christ with reference to his blood is to name the peace that is ours; to name this peace is to name him. He is the personification or rather the embodiment of our peace. His identification is the strongest way of saying that he wrought out our peace, and that we have this peace by spiritual connection with him.

We are well conditioned in this present world system to understand peace as being needed between two countries, or a family dispute, and this is usually formalized in a treaty, or at least a conversation, in order to bring both parties to terms that cause the conflict to cease. We see peaces as tranquility that fills the void. For the believer in Christ, the hostility ceased at the cross. Stanford understands this as “Peace Personified,” of which he has written in his Position Papers:

The Lord of glory has finished the work given Him to do, and the Father has raised Him from the dead, and seated Him at His own right hand. Was it not “for us”? Do you think He has peace with His Father? Look not at yourselves, but at Him. There is One seated in the unclouded presence of the Father, where a cloud or shadow can never come; that One, the Beginning and Head of a new creation, crowned once, with thorns, now with glory. Can sin and death have anymore to say to Him? Do not you think He has peace? Assuredly, and “He is our peace.” And if He is our peace, the peace that He has in the presence of the Father is ours, not as a thing apart from Himself, but His very Person in glory is the believer’s peace. The very One who is our peace is our life, and we are hid with Him in the Father. Heavenly peace for the earthly path.

The very need for peace leads to the conclusion that there must be a hostility that needs to be addressed. But this quarrel was never between the Father and the Son, but between the Father and our sin. Our Creator loves us, but He certainly hates our sin (Neh 13:26; Rev 1:5). Sin is what separates us from Him, thus it is nothing short of vile and detestable in the sight of the Lord. However, this has not caused the Lord to uphold righteousness and justice only, but He has provided relief for our sins in grace by the giving of His Son. Thus, Jesus is the Peace Personified Who sufficiently addresses our sin issue while setting us free from our slavery to it. The wrath of God is satisfied (meaning that it satisfies His perfect criteria for righteousness and justice) because of the blood of the Son (Heb 9:22). Being undeserved in any way, it is wholly of grace from the Father to us so that peace will once again reign.

Second, the apostle also uses “our” (PIP) to mean both Jews and Gentiles, Paul included. When we speak of inequality, we often speak in categories that usually speak to one’s social standing, economic status, race, gender, educational achievements, or the lack of any number of these. We classify individuals and groups of people to our liking. We have a bias, and we are comfortable using it. We also have an obsession with compartmentalizing and categorizing everything to our liking. But we must ask ourselves, “Are these categories are biblical?” If we are looking for the biblical understanding of all people and the true nature of equality, we can be certain of this:

-All are sinners who are deserving of wrath who are in need of a Savior (Rom 3:23)

-All who believe in Jesus Christ are justified (Rom 3:22-24)

-While some are more mature than others in the Body of Christ,

All are declared righteous because All believers are in Christ (2 Cor 5:21).

There is a temptation among Bible students to use the present passage for addressing the issue of racial inequality, which can find application in principle, as long as the solution of the Lord Jesus is not pushed to the wayside in favor of programs and “continued conversation.” Such solutions find their roots in human efforts and achievement. Social programs may garner a large donation or even a front page editorial, but they cannot guarantee a permanent solution. God’s answer to the divisions between people is not found in social action, but in the Person of Jesus Christ standing as the means of one having peace with God, and therefore peace with one another. The answer is supernatural, not carnal. It is of the Spirit, not the flesh.

While many have tried to accomplish peace, legislate peace, bring about peace, point toward peace, live in peace, die in peace, sign off on peace, and “visualize world peace,” the simple fact of the matter is that there is only one true and trustworthy Object that supplies peace because He alone IS peace personified, and that is Jesus of Nazareth, the Savior of the world, YHWH’s promised Messiah.

The final observation is that unity has been accomplished because Jesus has broken down the dividing wall “in His flesh” (Eph 2:14c-15a). While the extended revelation to the Jews in 2:12 demonstrated an obvious advantage in knowing YHWH, it also served to severe the Jewish people from the Gentiles. The Jews were called to holiness (Exod 19:6; 22:31; Lev 11:44, 45; 19:2; 20:7) to be a people that are distinguished and separate from the nations (Deut 7:1-8). In using the language of “breaking down the dividing wall of hostility” (ESV), one may immediately think of the divisions of the court yards surrounding the Temple as Baugh does when he writes,

A famous wall inscription that faced the outer courtyard of the Jerusalem temple is extant; it warned Gentiles that they would have only themselves to blame for their death if they passed into the inner courts. Hence, it was a “dividing wall” or “a wall that separates.” Paul may or may not be alluding to this wall in v. 14, but it well illustrates Jesus Christ’s reconciliation of all peoples by tearing down this wall and building up both Jews and Gentiles into a new humanity (v. 15).

This explanation cannot be ruled out entirely, but it seems unwarranted due to the lack of any reference to the Temple (until 2:21) or Jerusalem in the text. One may also consider the unfamiliarity of the Ephesian believers (or any of the predominantly Gentile congregations in the sequence of the cyclical letter) with the details of the Temple and its layout. Bruce has concluded that this is a “psychological” barrier, with the Jews flaunting a sense of superiority over the nations. But it is plain from the context that Paul identifies the source of the “dividing wall” as the “Law of commandments contained in ordinances” which is readily understood as the Mosiac Law.

The repeated emphasis on the peace that is Jesus and the peace that Jesus established, and preaches, to both Jews and Gentiles due to the giving of Himself on the cross, runs against “the Law of commandments” as the solution to the enmity. The problem is the Law in regard to the two unregenerate parties. The solution is the Savior who dies perfectly for each party’s sins and unites them both into a brand-new entity. Christ, being the payment for sin, not only removes the boundary, but in turn unifies both sides into “one new man” (Eph 2:15c) being founded in Christ. This new identity “in Christ” allows for each party to shed their previous ethnic trappings. In other words, the Law prevented the unification of Jew and Gentile due to sin.

The Law is identified by the apostle in three different ways, all stressing the same issue. First he speaks of the Law as a “barrier” that Christ has broken down. “Barrier” means “dividing wall,” while Paul’s use of “dividing wall” means “a structure for enclosing an area, fence, hedge,” or “a wall that separates, partition.” The final word, which occurs again in v. 16c, is “enmity” (Eph 2:15a) meaning “being an enemy of.” These three designations are not just similar, but are unified in what they are conveying. Wuest explains, “The words ‘the enmity’ follow the words ‘middle wall of partition,’ (‘barrier of the dividing wall’- NASB) only the participle separating them, and should be construed as defining them, namely, ‘the middle wall which was the enmity.’”

There has been great debate about the role of the Law in the life of the Church. This is a vast area of many arguments, but rather than address each one ad nauseum it would be more beneficial to simply look to the New Testament Scriptures for a clear understanding of this issue. First, we see that the Law is the identifier of sin and holds the whole world accountable to it because all have sinned (Rom 3:19). Second, the Law is good only if one uses it lawfully (1 Tim 1:8). Paul then explains to Timothy how to use the Law lawfully. He writes,

…that law is not made for a righteous person, but for those who are lawless and rebellious, for the ungodly and sinners, for the unholy and profane, for those who kill their fathers or mothers, for murderers and immoral men and homosexuals and kidnappers and liars and perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound teaching, according to the glorious gospel of the blessed God, with which I have been entrusted (1 Tim 1:9b-11).

The Law is not applicable to a “righteous person.” This can either be explained as those who are in Christ (being justified by God- Rom 3:24) as opposed to those who are unregenerate (lost), or it could be understood as pertaining to identifying the sins of those who are in Christ but who are living in a rebellious manner in their daily walk. Contextually, Paul is speaking about the “goal” of their instruction being that of love with a pure heart, a good conscience, and a sincere faith (1 Tim 1:5). Paul never notes that his instruction, nor that of Timothy’s instruction, should be that of the Law. Paul is clear that the Law has no bearing whatsoever on the one who is “in Christ” (Rom 10:4; Gal 2:16; 3:25). So we should not assume this here. This does not promote an attitude of lawless living among Christians, as some would accuse when utilizing the word “antinomianism” (anti- “against,” nomos- “law”), but simply to state that the Law’s place is found only in singling out sin, regardless if they are a believer or an unbeliever.

Third, we see that it is an impossibility for one to be justified by keeping the works of the Law (Rom 3:20; Gal 3:21) This is the very reason that we need Christ! Apart from Him, justification before a holy God is impossible. One is not saved, nor does one grow in law-keeping (Rom 3:21-24; Gal 3:1-3). Such behaviors as listed above have the righteous Law of God as the proper means which identifies their heinous nature without excuse or apology. The Law cannot redeem in any way, yet its job in condemning the sinner is done in perfection.

Fourth, we see that the Law was added because of transgressions (Gal 3:19). The Law served as a “guardian” (the Greek word speaks of pedagogy, being understood as a guide, teacher, or leader) until Christ came. Now that Christ has come, all are sons of God through faith (Gal 3:24-26). Even still, the idea that the Law as necessary for the Christian falls away when Paul states, “the Law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, does not invalidate a covenant previously ratified by God, so as to nullify the promise. For if the inheritance is based on law, it is no longer based on a promise; but God has granted it to Abraham by means of a promise” (Gal 3:17-18). Abraham knew nothing of the Law, yet he was “reckoned” righteous by God when he believed the promise of God to him regarding his offspring (Gen 15:4-6). When a sinner believes in the Lord Jesus Christ, whom God has put forth as a propitiation for our sins, we are also “reckoned righteous” by Him (Rom 3:21-28). However, this does not bring the one who believes into the nation of Israel. The promise in the covenant to Abram that applies to the Church Dispensation Christian is that of the nations being blessed through Abram (Gen 12:2c).

Lastly, we see that if one “is led by the Spirit,” he or she is not under the Law (Gal 5:18). This truth would fall into line if those spoken of in 1 Timothy 1:9-12 are considered wayward believers who are living a life of rebellion, being carnal Christians, acting as “mere men” (1 Cor 3:1-4). It is clear from Galatians 5 that godly living is a fruit of the Spirit and are exempt from having a law placed upon them (5:22-23). When contrasted with the preceding list of those actions and attitudes that are considered “deeds in the flesh” (Gal 5:19-21), a greater case is made for the Law’s use in singling out sin according to the righteous standards of YHWH as contained in the Law, yet without a mandate to keep the Law in response. Since the Law cannot save, it is opting for the “law of liberty” (Jas 1:25; 2:12), which is the “implanted Word” (Jas 1:21), being by grace in Christ living His life through the believer, that produces the fruit of the Spirit (Gal 5:22-23).

If we were to get down to brass tacks, when one believes in Jesus Christ, they immediately receive a “new life” apart from the Law (2 Cor 5:17). This life is only found in Jesus Christ because it is His very life, who is God’s righteousness as revealed “apart from the Law” (Rom 3:21). Paul also states that Christ is the end of the law for righteousness to everyone who believes (Rom 10:4), meaning those who are “in Christ.” Clearly, Christ has fulfilled the Law in His earthly life and destroyed the Law in His flesh on the cross. Hawley writes that, “The Bible could not be clearer that the Christian is not under law, and that the law was indeed abolished through the crucifixion of Christ.” This “abolishing” of the “Law of commandments contained in ordinances” is understood as “to make null and void.” Beal and Radmacher write, “Although the Law is still in existence and has a purpose, for the Christian it is neither a means to salvation nor is any part of it a rule by which to live.” The Christian is truly free because he or she has been permanently transported into a new location by the blood of Jesus.

It should also be noted that this “abolishing in His flesh” is the definitive marker for the 69th week of Daniel in Daniel 9:24-27. Note the passage and the portion emphasized.

Seventy weeks have been decreed for your people and your holy city, to finish the transgression, to make an end of sin, to make atonement for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up vision and prophecy and to anoint the most holy place. So you are to know and discern that from the issuing of a decree to restore and rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Prince there will be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks; it will be built again, with plaza and moat, even in times of distress. Then after the sixty-two weeks the Messiah will be cut off and have nothing, and the people of the prince who is to come will destroy the city and the sanctuary. And its end will come with a flood; even to the end there will be war; desolations are determined. And he will make a firm covenant with the many for one week, but in the middle of the week he will put a stop to sacrifice and grain offering; and on the wing of abominations will come one who makes desolate, even until a complete destruction, one that is decreed, is poured out on the one who makes desolate.”

This prophecy sets the definitive time markers for understanding God’s plan for the ages with the crucifixion of Christ being a pivotal event in how one reads and understands its fulfillment. Tanner remarks:

This “cutting off” of Messiah suggests a violent death. The fulfillment of this “cutting off,” then, is the crucifixion of the Lord Jesus on Nisan 14, ad 33, thereby fulfilling the prophecy of Isa 52:13–53:12. As a result, he is said to “have nothing.” The text is not clear to what this refers (commentators have made numerous suggestions), but the most logical explanation has to do with what was promised the “Son of Man” in Dan 7:13–14, namely his everlasting dominion and a kingdom that would not be destroyed

Jesus’ death completes the 69th “week,” stopping the prophetic clock and leaving the remaining 7 years unfulfilled (Dan 9:24a). In addressing the events of Daniel 9:27 and the remaining seven “weeks,” we read”

The final seven-year period, or the seventieth week, will begin when he (the coming prince) will make a firm covenant of peace with many in the leadership of Israel. Although some consider the prince to be Messiah, he is more accurately identified as the antichrist, who will desecrate the future temple and put a stop to worship there. This covenant is yet future and will mark the beginning of a time of oppression of the Jewish people called “a time of trouble for Jacob” (Jr 30:7) or the tribulation period (Mt 24:29; Mk 13:24).

This explanation provides understanding that God is in control of the events of history. He carefully oversees their unfolding and He can accomplish His gracious will even through the greatest of tragedies.

So, having abolished the Law, Jesus IS our peace. He is Peace personified.

The now-void nature of the Law results in the possibility of complete unification and peace between the Jew and the Gentile in Christ. Foulkes explains:

In Christ there is a new humanity; and it is a single entity. God now deals with Jews and Gentiles as such a single entity. Furthermore, Gentiles do not simply rise to the status of Jews, but both become something new and greater; and it is significant that the word for new here (kainos) means not simply new in point of time, but as Barclay puts it ‘new in the sense that it brings into the world a new kind of thing, a new quality of thing, which did not exist before’ (see also on 4:23–24).

Again, this is profound reality is only found in Christ. The unity that occurs can be seen as mentioned in the epistle to the Colossians. Note the following:

For it was the Father’s good pleasure for all the fullness to dwell in Him, and through Him to reconcile all things to Himself, having made peace through the blood of His cross; through Him, I say, whether things on earth or things in heaven (Col 1:19-20).

It is an obvious theme in Paul’s theology that the cross of Christ makes peace. This designation of the possibility of a “one new man” is found to be the means by which Christ ESTABLISHES peace (Eph 2:15c). This “one new man” is not an expansion of Israel as the entity to which Christ is unifying the two, nor is it a disregard and “writing-off” of the Jewish people in the plan of God (Rom 11:1). However, it is a “mystery” that was “which for ages has been hidden in God” (Eph 3:9), of which the “the Gentiles are fellow heirs and fellow members of the body, and fellow partakers of the promise in Christ Jesus through the gospel” (Eph 3:6). The Church is something new that God is doing; one that was previously unrevealed in the Old Testament, marking a clear change in the dispensation. While it is obvious from Scripture that the Church began at Jerusalem during the time of Pentecost (Acts 2), it must also be equally obvious that the make-up of the early Church was exclusively Jewish and that Scripture does not give an official “inclusion of the Gentiles” until Peter’s ministry to Cornelius in Caesarea (Acts 10:1-48). We see this identified in Peter’s report to the Jerusalem Church (11:1-16). The conclusion reached by both Peter and the Jerusalem Church is truly glorious:

“Therefore if God gave to them the same gift as He gave to us also after believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, who was I that I could stand in God’s way?” When they heard this, they quieted down and glorified God, saying, “Well then, God has granted to the Gentiles also the repentance that leads to life” (Acts 11:17-18).

So we see that in bringing both Jews and Gentiles together into “one new man,” Jesus ESTABLISHES peace, with Himself being the means of accomplishing that peace.

Ephesians 2:16-18

The peace found in 2:16 is that of reconciliation. Reconciliation is the restoration of one back into a right-standing or a right relationship. For the Christian, the idea is found to be that Christ’s blood has brought us back into our intended initial position for which we were created; that of being “in right-relationship with God freely.” The implications of this one word stretch to amazing vistas when understanding it in relation to YHWH and the lengths to which He has undertaken in providing a sufficient Savior. Louw and Nida explain:

Because of the variety and complexity of the components involved in reconciliation, it is often necessary to use an entire phrase in order to communicate satisfactorily the meanings of the terms in this subdomain. In some languages, however, reconciliation is often spoken of in idiomatic terms, for example, ‘to cause to become friends again,’ ‘to cause to snap fingers again’ (a symbol of friendly interpersonal relations in many parts of Africa), ‘to cause to be one again,’ or ‘to take away the separation.’ A particularly crucial element in terms for reconciliation is the assigning of responsibility for original guilt in causing the estrangement. Some terms, for example, imply that the individual who initiates reconciliation is by doing so admitting his guilt in causing the estrangement. This, of course, provides a completely untenable meaning for reconciliation in speaking of God reconciling people to himself through Christ.

How the grace of God shines in this understanding of reconciliation! YHWH is the offended party, not the one who admits guilt by putting forth the means of making reconciliation. God understands that the means for reconciliation could never be supplied by sinful mankind. Our lot is truly helpless, and our attempts and efforts are impoverished at best. Have we ever experienced the offended party reaching out to make permanent and superior amends with the one that offended them so greatly? No, this is only found in the grace of God in the atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ.

With “reconciliation,” we have come upon a concept that is rife in Paul’s theology. The following list is for the purpose of being encouraged and for understanding that Christ’s sacrifice is perfect in accomplishing this otherwise impossible feat.

For while we were still helpless, at the right time Christ died for the ungodly. For one will hardly die for a righteous man; though perhaps for the good man someone would dare even to die. But God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us. Much more then, having now been justified by His blood, we shall be saved from the wrath of God through Him. For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life. And not only this, but we also exult in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received the reconciliation (Rom 5:6-11, emphasis added).

Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come. Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation (2 Cor 5:17-19, emphasis added).

Both Jew and Gentile are reconciled to YHWH Elohim, through faith in Jesus Christ who made this reconciliation possible by His death on the cross which involved the shedding of His blood for the sins of the world. This was not done by the repeated sacrifice of animals (Heb 10:3-4), but in Christ’s body, nailed to a cross for sin (Heb 10:8-10). However, the “one body” in v. 16 does not speak of Christ’s physical body, but of the new entity that is the Church (the Body of Christ). The atonement of His blood in His death kills the “enmity.” This “enmity” is explained by Hoehner when he writes:

The hostility is not the same as that which is mentioned in verse 14. There it speaks of the hostility between Jews and Gentiles, but here it speaks of hostility between God and human beings. The reason for the change is due to the change of contexts. In verses 14-15 Paul deals with the union of believing Jews and Gentiles into one new humanity, but here in verse 16 he discusses the reconciliation of this body of Jews and Gentiles to God.

What is beautiful about this unity that has been made possible in Christ is that this peace was preached by Christ Himself! We see this proclamation throughout the Gospels without reservation upon the one that responds. Note the following:

“Come to Me, all who are weary and heavy-laden, and I will give you rest. Take My yoke upon you and learn from Me, for I am gentle and humble in heart, and you will find rest for your souls. For My yoke is easy and My burden is light” (Matt 11:28-30).

Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life; he who comes to Me will not hunger, and he who believes in Me will never thirst” (John 6:35).

“For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day” (John 6:40).

Truly, truly, I say to you, he who believes has eternal life (John 6:47).

Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink. He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, ‘From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water’” (John 7:37-38).

The Spirit and the bride say, “Come.” And let the one who hears say, “Come.” And let the one who is thirsty come; let the one who wishes take the water of life without cost (Rev 22:17).

Whether one is “far off” (Gentile) or “near” (Jew), this peace is available to all who believe, and those who believe are placed into the “one new man” which is the Church. This points us to the responsibility of the Church in this present dispensation, as we serve as an extension of the message of peace that has been secured by Christ Jesus our Lord. The Church as a whole has the responsibility of preaching and teaching all who will hear regarding the message of reconciliation in Christ Jesus alone (Matt 28:18-20; John 13:16-20; Acts 9:15-16; 2 Cor 5:17-21).

This quotation of Isaiah 57:19 should not be understood as the apostle providing an interpretation in Ephesians 2:17, but rather applying it to his present point. Both Gentile and Jew can now receive the peace that only Jesus provides. “And peace it is indeed, for it means nothing less than our entrance, hand in hand, into the inmost presence of a welcoming, loving, rejoicing God.”

So we see that Jesus is the One who PREACHES (euangelizō) peace to Jew and Gentile alike through the Church, so that they all may believe and be placed into the Body of Christ.

It is through Christ, as seen in Ephesians 2:18, and through Christ alone that Jew and Gentile have access to the Father (John 14:6). This is a present tense reality. However, there is a qualifier that establishes this access as being in “one Spirit.” The exclusivity of Christ in salvation should not be surprising considering the reply of Peter in stating that, “And there is salvation in no one else; for there is no other name under heaven that has been given among men by which we must be saved” (Acts 4:12). So, what is meant by Paul in stating that this access is in “one Spirit?”

In Scripture we find that the Holy Spirit serving in many different capacities. He is perfectly, and equally part of the Trinity, just as are the Father and the Son. This idea of a singular Spirit is most plainly seen in Ephesians 4:4 when Paul states that “There is one body and one Spirit;” having already clarified in our present passage that this Body is the “one new man” consisting of believing Jews and Gentiles (Eph 2:15). We have already seen that the Spirit seals the believer (1:13), and we will see that the Spirit is presently building believers into dwelling place for God (Eph 2:22), and is the Revealer of Truth (Eph 3:5), which concerns the understanding of the mystery of the Church. While Lenski holds that this should be understood as Jew and Gentile now coming in “one spirit” meaning “as one unit,” I believe that Paul is acknowledging the role of the Holy Spirit in bringing about this unity. Chafer expounds upon the role of the Holy Spirit in this marvelous reality for the believer in Christ:

All three Persons of the Godhead appear in this brief text. It declares that both Jew and Gentile, being saved, have access through Christ and by the Spirit unto the Father. The essential part which Christ has accomplished has been considered at length, but there is also a part which the Holy Spirit undertakes. The Christian’s apprehension (1 Cor 2:10), communion (2 Cor 13:14), and much of his qualification for the divine presence (1 Cor 12:13), are directly the work of the Holy Spirit. The all-important truth—marvelous beyond comprehension—is that each believer has perfect and immutable access unto the Father.

Chafer’s insights are indispensable. It is through the Spirit that God chooses to reveal His great wisdom to believers, and that He does freely (1 Cor 2:6-12)! It is in the Spirit that fellowship is shared by the Body of Christ (2 Cor 13:14). Finally, it is in the Spirit that all believers are baptized (immersed) at the moment of faith, thus unifying us in Christ Jesus (1 Cor 12:13). Paul notes that the Spirit is essential in our “access” to the Father (Eph 2:18b). “The word access includes the ideas of bringing and introducing. Not only has heaven’s door been opened, but believers have been properly introduced to the Father. The Holy Spirit takes both groups (as individuals, of course) and implants regenerated life, so that they are now members of the same family—the family of God.”

Paul educates us in that there are two peoples (Jew and Gentile), with unity only possible by Christ’s blood (2:13), placing them into Christ’s body (2:16) which is a brand-new entity, with both now having equal access to the Father in one Holy Spirit (2:18). How Great is the grace of God in making such unattainable things a reality for the sin-stricken person! In a world that is riddled with confusion and malice, exploitation and haughtiness, we find that peace is in the most obvious, yet least sought-out place: in Christ.

Brought Near by the Blood- Ephesians 2:11-13

Unified in Christ

Starting this section of Ephesians 2:11-22, we see that Paul begins to make a distinction between the Jews and the Gentiles. Many commentators believe that this has been Paul’s thinking in chapter 1, but Ephesians 2:11 is the first time that this has been clearly distinguished in this letter. However, this identification of the separation between the two groups belongs to the time in which they were both “dead in trespasses and sins” (2:1, 5). The parallels are apparent between 2:1-3 and 2:11-12. Paul is demonstrating that the uncircumcised (Gentiles) were not privy to the heightened revelation that the circumcised (Jews) had been given in the past (Rom 9:3-5). The purpose of Paul’s identification of the separation is to uphold the cross of Christ as the ultimate instrument of reconciliation (Eph 2:16) and Christ Jesus as the Great Reconciler of this prior racial hostility that was in their ranks. The blood of Christ has brought the Gentiles near (2:13) and the cross of Christ creates one New Man (2:16) where there had formerly been division between the two caused by the Law (2:15). This brand-new, unified assembly known as the Church is God’s household (2:19c), His holy temple (2:21c) being a “dwelling place” for God (2:22).

Ephesians 2:11-13

The purpose of Christ’s work for human salvation is not limited to the giving of new life to individual men and women, previously dead in sin, as the last section has described. Chapter 1 has given hints that it goes beyond this, and the present section now shows that it involves the bringing of those individuals, whatever their race or background, into unity in the people of God.

The cross of Jesus Christ contains multiplied effects upon every people group. In Paul’s mind, there are three classifications of people. He writes, “Give no offense either to Jews or to Greeks or to the church of God;” (1 Cor 10:32). While both Jews and Greeks would be understood in the New Testament as being “unsaved” or “unregenerate,” the Church consists of a trans-national people who are unified by Jesus’ blood, regardless of their origin or background. This is the backdrop for Ephesians 2:11-22.

Paul begins in verse 11 with “therefore” (dio), a conjunction that automatically causes the studying saint to refer back to the previous point that Paul had been expressing. Just as we have seen the use of “for” (gar) in referring back to certain phrases or ideas that Paul has expressed, we see “therefore” as transitioning to a continuance (or progression) of thought in light of what has been previously stated; which seems to be the truth that at one time, the Gentiles were dead in their trespasses and sins (2:1, 5) and were living in accordance with the façade of this present world system whose orchestrator is the devil (2:2-3). God has stepped in and has made it possible for the Gentiles to be spiritually alive (2:4-5) through the offering of Christ, even though they had no previous history of intimate connection to YHWH and His divine revelation as the Jews had (Rom 9:3-5).

With verse 11, a clear distinction is made between the Jews and Gentile who may be the recipients of this cyclical letter. Paul turns his attention to the Gentiles, noting the distinctions in their previous history. The apostle’s use of “you” and speaking to their former lot is also a designation that Paul classifies as “in the flesh.” This has everything to do with who they were before coming to faith in Jesus Christ. Paul makes these opening distinctions by identifying the Gentiles as the “uncircumcision” and seems to use this designation because it is one that had been touted among the Jews in the first century as a pejorative term. This harkens back to David’s words when addressing the men of Israel in reference to Goliath when he says, “What will be done for the man who kills this Philistine and takes away the reproach from Israel? For who is this uncircumcised Philistine, that he should taunt the armies of the living God?” David’s emphasis was upon Goliath’s lack of having any unconditional promises from the Creator. In David’s eyes, this made Goliath defenseless and easy prey. For the first century Jew, such slander was boisterous and self-serving, seeing that the Jews’ claims to piety were superficial and meaningless before God. The first century Jews were certainly not relying on YHWH to defeat their enemies and give them victory. Instead, the heritage of the promises had become an excuse for racism and hate.

What stands out about this shift in Paul’s address is that the previous truths of Ephesians 2:1-10 were not exclusively Jewish in nature. Nor were the truths in Ephesians 1:3-23. In fact, the opening salutation is addressed to those who are “saints” and “faithful in Christ Jesus” (Eph 1:1b), giving no indication of a separation in Paul’s line of thinking. Therefore, one may assume too much here, making a greater distinction than the apostle does. Instead, a more consistent take would be to see Paul turning his attention to the Gentiles because of their particularly destitute state throughout history where exposure to the truths of YHWH and His Person were virtually absent. Biblical record bears this out, with YHWH withdrawing Himself from the world at large in Genesis 1-11 and settling upon Abram, a man from Ur of the Chaldeans (Gen 11:27-32) and establishing a covenant with him which contains massive implications well into the Millennial Reign (Gen 12:1-3; 15:1-21; 17:2-19). This understanding would bring greater clarity to the use of “therefore,” seeing that the extents of God’s grace toward sinners is the chief theme, and this theme of grace is carried into the darkest of places. In other words, it is one thing to have God actively courting your people as He did the Jews and we would all consider this an act of grace, but it is another thing to have no courtship with the Creator, and yet He mercifully save you at His own expense. A spiritual poverty of this level (as will be seen in 2:12) only exemplifies the grace of God that much more (Luke 7:47)!

Paul is quick to note that those in the “circumcision” group (the Jews) are only considered such by a work of their hands (Acts 11:2) and not by the circumcision of the heart (Deut 10:16; 30:6; Jer 4:4; 9:25). Anyone with a Jewish background would have been jarred upon hearing this read aloud.

The metaphor of circumcision is now employed in reference to the heart. An uncircumcised heart is one which is, as it were, closed in and impervious to God’s incoming, just as an uncircumcised ear (Jer. 6:10) is one which hears imperfectly being covered over, and uncircumcised lips (Exod. 6:12, 30) are lips which speak incoherently because they are sealed wholly or in part. If that which hinders is cut away (the parallel with physical circumcision is obvious), then the circumcised heart becomes open and, being freed from hindering obstructions, it can become pliable and amenable to the direction of God. The result of such a circumcision will be submission to the will of God and the end of stubbornness. Nothing less befits the inscrutable, electing love of Yahweh. Indeed, without circumcision of the heart true fear of God and true love of God are both impossible.

Paul’s remark casts a blinding light on the hypocrisy of the Jewish elites who prided themselves in their version of law-keeping. Such an external commitment held no weight in the eyes of God due to their denial of the Messiah and their unregenerate nature. Markings, vows, and “good deeds” are only such that give the appearance of holiness and consecration but are considered a waste of time by the Almighty because they are not products of the Spirit. And if they are not products of the Spirit, they have no connection to grace. Concerning Paul’s point, Wood notes that,

As a Jew, however, he is quick to point out that the self-styled circumcisionists have nothing to boast about, since an external man-made mark in itself holds no spiritual significance. The real circumcision is of the heart (Gal 5:6). Circumcision used to be a token of the covenant, but its function ceased when redemption was finally accomplished in Christ.

This is certainly a contrast that fits perfectly with the work of God in making the Church His masterpiece, the new creation in Christ Jesus that has been given His good works to accomplish (Eph 2:10). One can sense the hostility that existed between Jews and Gentiles from reading this verse, as well as Paul’s sarcasm at the thought that something physical could possibly merit anything spiritual. However, he does not allow this to sway his communication regarding the previous state of the Gentiles.

In verse 12, Paul picks up his initial thought by repeating the word “remember” in reference to the Gentiles. “The Apostle Paul details the horrifying predicament confronting the Gentiles under the Old Covenant by summarizing five privileges that the people of Israel had which the Gentiles did not.” The Gentiles were the only race of people up until Genesis 12:1-3, where YHWH cuts an unconditional covenant with Abram in promising him a homeland, many offspring, and that through him would come a worldwide blessing. God chooses one man with which to start a nation of people that would uphold the Name of the Lord and serve as His earthly representatives of blessing. Ryrie notes that, “Until this dispensation, all mankind had been directly related to God’s governing principles. Now God marked out one family and one nation and in them made a representative test of all.” Thus, Paul’s address to the Gentiles here is for the purpose of stating a specific point: Even though you were in a destitute state and devoid of any relationship with YHWH, His Christ has paved a way to bring you into intimacy with Himself by His precious blood. The Gentiles simply did not have the great benefits of supernatural revelation as God had graciously given to the Jews (Rom 9:1-5). Seeing that they were now “in Christ,” this would convey the idea of an even greater privilege made available to them by God’s grace. It is important that we briefly unpack each one.

The first point mentioned is that the Gentiles were “separate from Christ.” Hoehner writes, “not only personally (true also of many Jews) but also in that they had no national hope of the Messiah.” It isn’t simply that Gentiles were spiritually “dead,” which is true of everyone apart from Christ regardless of their nationality. It was that they had no means of salvation before them. The Jews had the promise of a Messiah that resonated throughout the Old Testament writings (Gen 12:3, 7, 15; 49:10; 2 Sam 7:12-13; Isa 7:14; 53:1-12; Mic 5:2). As a people, Gentiles were in a truly deplorable state. “Separated” here means “without” or “apart.” MacPherson writes, “As Gentiles in the flesh, they were members of a community which followed a course of life that had no relation to Christ, and made no reference to Him. Their lives were lived apart from Christ.” When one thinks back to Egypt and God’s dealings with them, there has been much written about the relationship between the plagues that were cast upon the Egyptians and how each specific one faced down a false deity, a demon who had masqueraded as a sense of hope if works were performed correctly. Such demands were usually immoral, and being as such, were not an exhibition of grace. This was the only “salvation” that the Egyptians had, perpetuating a culture of unbelief, paganism, and works-based acceptance.

The second issue that Paul states is that the Gentiles were “excluded from the commonwealth of Israel.” Hoehner notes that the participle translated as “excluded” in the NASB occurs twice more in the New Testament (Eph 4:18; Col 1:21). Both instances speak of being separated from the life that God provides in Christ. Hoehner notes that “excluded” should be understood as “alienated from the citizenship that belongs to Israel.” “Commonwealth” is the word politiea meaning “a sociopolitical unit or body of citizens” according to BDAG’s choice of definitions. Ferris notes, “The commonwealth of Israel means a Jew was not just a descendant of Jacob, but also part of a covenant community, that which emerged from Egypt at the Exodus.”

Romans 9:3-5 may bring some clarity as to Paul’s meaning here.

For I could wish that I myself were accursed, separated from Christ for the sake of my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh, who are Israelites, to whom belongs the adoption as sons, and the glory and the covenants and the giving of the Law and the temple service and the promises, whose are the fathers, and from whom is the Christ according to the flesh, who is over all, God blessed forever. Amen.

Having expounded upon the permanence of the love of God toward believer through Jesus Christ (Rom 8:38-39), a natural question could be assumed by the readers of Romans: “If God’s love is permanent, why is Israel not saved?” Reading Romans 9:1-5, Paul’s grief is evident. If it were possible (and Romans 8:38-39 shows that it is not), Paul would wish himself accursed for the sake of the of the salvation of Israel, his “kinsmen according to the flesh.” It was an absolute travesty to see Israel in AD 60-66 being largely in unbelief, having rejected their Messiah when they had been given so much revelation from YHWH. But what stands out for our purposes in Ephesians 2:12 is understanding the correlation between those blessings of revelation given to the Jews and the emphasis that Paul places in the formerly-destitute state of the Gentiles.

This notion of being a “commonwealth” signified special privileges and claims that had been placed upon them exclusively. For instance, the “adoption as sons” (Exod 4:22-23; Hos 11:1) carries significant weight seeing that “sonship” “evokes a sense of even more intimacy than either people or nation.” Merrill expounds on this, writing “The language of family connotes a kinship that transcends the normal relationship of a god and his nation. For Israel to be the Lord's firstborn son was to share consanguinity, if not in a literal or physical sense then at least in a profoundly theological sense.” This is nothing short of grace! In Deuteronomy 7:6-8 we read,

For you are a holy people to the Lord your God; the Lord your God has chosen you to be a people for His own possession out of all the peoples who are on the face of the earth. The Lord did not set His love on you nor choose you because you were more in number than any of the peoples, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but because the Lord loved you and kept the oath which He swore to your forefathers, the Lord brought you out by a mighty hand and redeemed you from the house of slavery, from the hand of Pharaoh king of Egypt (emphasis added).

Such gracious concessions are an act of love by the Creator. Not one soul, much less a nation of people on the face of the Earth were worthy of YHWH’s special attention. But praise God that the motivation to extend such grace with found within Himself and is not based upon one’s merit. So, too, did they have access to experiencing God’s glory like no one else (Exod 13:20-21; 14:13-31; 16:10), having sealed agreements (covenants-Gen 12:1-3; Deut 28:1-30:20; 2 Sam 7:8-16; Jer 31:31-34, which we will expounded upon in the appendix), the giving of the Mosaic Law (Exod 20:1-20), the temple services (Lev 1-9), the promises, which “are contained in the Law, the Prophets, and the Writings. They are general promises and include all promises regarding the first and second coming of Messiah as well as the Messianic Kingdom” Of course, “the fathers” speak of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and the Christ “according to the flesh” emphasizes the Abrahamic Covenant, as well as promoting the coming Messianic Reign. By themselves

One must not conclude that the goal for the Gentiles is to become part of the citizenship that belongs to Israel. Proselytizing is not the point here. We should also not make the grave interpretive mistake of assuming that Paul is pushing the idea that when Gentiles believe in Christ they become part of the “New Israel,” or “spiritual Israel,” which are terms that many Covenant theologians use in reference to the Church. The Church is a completely separate, trans-national entity, while Israel is a national people, chosen by God (Gen 12:1-3; Rom 11:1-2; 25-27). To mingle these two groups leads to theological and hermeneutical ruin, for it abandons the literal meaning of the text while disregarding the context in favor of a preformulated system. This ultimately leaves the basis of interpretation up to the interpreter rather than allowing for the text to unfold for itself in order to maintain the original author’s intent. Being Gentiles, they were certainly not Jews and therefore not part of how God had chosen to reveal Himself in the dispensations of Promise (Gen 12:1-3) and Law (Exod 20:1-17).

The next issue of deficiency with the Gentiles is that they were a people who were “strangers to the covenants of promise.” It is important to understand that when the Bible speaks of a covenant, it is speaking of a “contract.” This stipulates that there are terms of agreement between the parties involved that will result in a specified behavior or outcome based on at least one of the parties involved. When we speak of an “unconditional covenant/contract,” in the Scriptures, we are speaking of the Noahic, Abrahamic, Priestly, Davidic, and New Covenants, for all of them rest upon the faithfulness of God Himself and will not be broken by the actions of the human race. Henebury writes, “God had previously ‘determined’ what He was going to do through the Abrahamic covenant. It was to be something which could not change. Therefore, by swearing by Himself, He showed the immutability of the covenant.”

When we speak of a “conditional covenant/contract,” we are referring to the Mosaic Covenant, which is likened to a suzerainty-vassal treaty. The Mosaic Covenant is also commonly known as an “if-then” covenant due to the conditions that are in place regarding its fulfillment. For instance, in Deuteronomy 28:1, we see that blessing will be given to Israel “if you diligently obey the Lord your God, being careful to do all His commandments which I command you today, the Lord your God will set you high above all the nations of the earth” (See also Exod 19:4-6). If Israel did not uphold the statutes of the Lord, Yahweh was no longer responsible to bless and protect the people of Israel because they had broken the covenant (contract- See 28:15-68).

The word “strangers” is xenos in the Greek and “a person belonging to a socio-political group other than the reference group—‘stranger, foreigner.’” Louw and Nida go on to write, “Terms for ‘stranger’ or ‘foreigner’ are often based upon geographical differences or upon lack of previous knowledge.” The subject at hand is the fact that “the covenants of promise” were not inclusive of, nor directed to the Gentiles. In addition, YHWH has not made a covenant with the Church. All of His dealings in unconditional contracts that are accompanied by an oath are between the Creator of all things and His chosen people, the Jews. As Ray explains, “This passage (Eph 2:12) does not state that Gentiles are now within the covenants of Israel, for the Church (the “one new man,” v. 15) never was a party to the covenants. No passage of Holy Writ mentions a covenant between God and the Church.” This is a point that should also be noted for those who confuse the Church with Israel. While there was one unconditional covenant that was made with Noah before the origination of the Jewish people (Gen 6:18; 8:20-22), we find that Paul’s emphasis concerns the covenants that were made starting with Abram. DeZago makes an excellent observation when he writes:

The Abrahamic Covenant serves as the backdrop for the entire biblical narrative. God

promised to make Abraham into a great nation, 12:2, as well as father of many nations, 17:5. God also promised to give Abraham a great name and, finally, that through Abraham there would be a great blessing, namely, that through Abraham all the nations of the earth would be blessed, 12:3. The unfolding of these promises from Genesis twelve through Revelation identifies the great nation as physical Israel who would occupy the land promised to Abraham, Genesis 13:14-15. The biblical narrative from Genesis twelve through Malachi presents the redemptive story as to how Israel developed (consider the implications beginning in Exodus 2:24).

The importance of the Abrahamic Covenant cannot be underestimated, for it is the foundational contract for the Davidic Covenant, Priestly Covenant, and the Palestinian Covenant, which will all find their fulfillment with the institution of the New Covenant; and by which all have their primary application to national Israel, just as Paul says in Ephesians 2:12. No, the Gentiles were truly a people who were without hope and “without God in the world” (Eph 2:12c)

While it is not the goal of this work to give a lengthy exposition of the Covenants of Israel, the subject is covered in APPENDIX…..

When reading this passage, one may ask, “Why would the apostle turn his letter to the former plight of the far-off Gentiles?” Kelly explains,

He wants us to know what was our condition. We have right to nothing; we have not the smallest claim upon God; we had no such prescriptive place conferred upon us as Israel had through the promises. They had a place even as unconverted men in the world; and the day is coming when, being converted, they will have a signally conspicuous position in the world, an earthly distinction and glory which never was and never will be our portion. Do not suppose that we shall not have far better, but we shall never have such a place on the earth. We shall have one with Christ over all things; but it will not be while we have our natural life here below. It is in the resurrection-state that the Church’s glory is destined to be brought out, in all its fulness, as far as manifested to the world.

God inserting Himself into the history of the Gentiles is an exceedingly gracious act! And with it, He put forth the means of creating a brand-new entity that unites Jew and Gentile together, causing them to abandon their former hostilities, affiliations, and biases, and giving them unparalleled acceptance and freedom, resulting from the work of His Son.

In verse 13, the barren canvas of Gentile history is washed over with the words “but now,” marking the present Church Dispensation as something different from what occurred before. Now, in the Dispensation of the Church, there is a location of complete acceptance and security before the holy God of all glory known as “in Christ Jesus!” As previously seen no less than 13 times in chapter 1, this astounding station of the believer is that of being “in” the Son of God, securely and completely. Our life is hidden with His in the Father (Col 3:3) and now, He IS our life (Col 3:4). It is within this new dispensation that the Gentile has been given a wide open door, should he respond to its invitation to enter, where previously the door was limited by God’s choosing (Exod 4:22-23; Deut 7:6) and by the recalcitrant and depraved choices of the Gentile nations (Gen 8:21; Lev 20:2; Deut 9:4-5).

This new joy that the Gentile finds in Ephesians 2:13 is that despite his or her history of “unprivileged revelation” in times past, the blood of Jesus Christ has now served the purpose of bringing him or her near, alongside the Jew, on equal footing within the sphere of “one new man” (Eph 2:15). Robertson translates this understanding as the Gentiles have been “made nigh.” The blood of Jesus Christ has both a restorative and transportive power. The blood brings Gentiles near (2:13), abolishes the Law (2:14-15), reconciles us all to God (2:16), and creates one new man in the Church (2:15). These are new revelations in the Church Dispensation. We must remember that the Gentiles did not have Leviticus 16 read to them periodically, so they were unaware of the Day of Atonement (Lev 16:29-34). They were unaware of the “mercy seat” (Lev 16:14), nor the need for a spotless lamb so that death would pass over them (Exod 12:2-7, 12-13). There was no history or oral tradition in speaking of a scapegoat (Lev 16:10) and another goat that was set aside for a sin offering (Lev 16:15). The Gentiles were unaware of YHWH and His righteous standards (Lev 20:7).

In looking to a point previously made, it is important to see that the idea that Paul is communicating is not one of the Gentile becoming a Jew, but that the blood of Christ has opened up the scope of salvation for everyone, regardless of the ethnicity that they hold, or the abundance (or lack) of previous revelation. We see this clearly in a passage like Hebrews 2:9:

But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone (emphasis added).

It is by God’s grace that the atonement of the Messiah has come to the Gentiles. C.H. Mackintosh writes, “By His precious atoning death He has met our entire condition as sinners. He has borne our sins, and put them away forever. He stood charged with all our sins—the sins of all who believe in His name.” The Scriptures proclaim that the atonement of Christ on the cross is universal in nature (John 1:29; Rom 5:18; 1 John 2:2). While the Jew may have had a greater span of revelation, they would still be considered as without justification apart from Jesus Christ and His atoning work. In fact, we will see that the themes contained within this section of Scripture are atonement, peace, and reconciliation; none of which are possible with the death and resurrection of Messiah the Prince (Dan 9:25).

Let us not become bashful about the blood. Jesus gave His life for us that He might give His life to us. The life of any living thing is in the blood (Gen 9:4-5; Lev 17:11). It is His selfless submission that has paid the price, bought the sinner, and brought him into liberty; making it possible only by His blood. He truly is the “Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world” (John 1:29)! Does not Psalm 22 forecast His suffering on Calvary? Do they not pierce His hands and His feet (Psa 22:16b)? Do we not hear of His proclamation of love by His selfless death in Revelation? “Jesus Christ, the faithful witness, the firstborn of the dead, and the ruler of the kings of the earth. To Him who loves us and released us from our sins by His blood” (Rev 1:5). Have we not already been reminded of God’s great grace toward us in Ephesians 1:7 where we are reminded of the redemption that we have in His blood which has granted us the forgiveness of our sins? We must exalt the blood, tell others about the blood, rejoice in the blood, hold high the banner of the blood of God’s lamb! We must be about the blood because the blood has been all over us. He has not left one millimeter of our being or existence to question in regards of sin, new life, power from the Spirit, or an eternity alongside the King of glory because the blood has covered the debt owed, and the blood has covered the sinner who owed it.

God's Masterpiece- Ephesians 2:10

Ephesians 2:10

Beginning in 2:10, we again find the word “for” being used in order to elaborate on the previous idea. Paul is offering an explanation, noting that we do not, indeed, we cannot bring works to our salvation. Not one single thought or action has ever been a source of pleasure for the Almighty because all was done while separated from Him (Eph 2:1-3). Instead, we had to be “in Christ Jesus” first before we could obediently follow through with good works. Let us not confuse the order here. It is deliberate, intentional so that the waters of the gospel message are not strewn with mud. By God’s grace, salvation has come to mankind (Eph 2:8a). This message demands a response, and only the response of faith provides the proper channel by which the glorious and eternal benefits and blessings of salvation are then accredited to the one who has believed (Eph 2:8b). Failure to believe, whether through hesitation, ignorance, or rejection, leaves one in the Ephesians 2:1-3 mire, separated from God. When one believes in Christ, it should not be thought that any works on behalf of the believer had any stake in the claims of salvation (Eph 2:9a). Rather, such works only count against us as a means of digging a deeper hole. Our boasting has no ground in our person (Eph 2:9b), but all boasting is to be unto God in gratitude for His divine plan to rescue the wicked from damnation in the Lake of Fire (Rev 20:11-15). Truly, this salvation is the gracious gift of God (Eph 2:8c). Notice Titus 3:5-7.

He saved us, not on the basis of deeds which we have done in righteousness, but according to His mercy, by the washing of regeneration and renewing by the Holy Spirit, whom He poured out upon us richly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that being justified by His grace we would be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life.

Deeds have no doing in the venture from spiritual death into spiritual life. But the question will certainly arise in the minds of any observant reader, “So what role DO works play, seeing that they are all throughout the Scriptures?”

Works most certainly DO play a role in the believer’s life, but they do not play a role in the salvation of a person from spiritual death to spiritual life. This may be more clearly understood if it is categorized as “justification salvation,” being derived from Romans 3:21-25 where those who have believed in the “righteousness of God” (i.e. Jesus Christ) are then “justified as a gift by His grace,” meaning that they are “declared righteous” in the halls of eternity by the Creator YHWH. The only work involved in this category is the work of Christ and that is enough. Nothing else is necessary for acceptance with God. The moment that one believes that Jesus died for their sins and was raised from the grave (1 Cor 15:3-4) an unbreakable relationship is formed, which is commonly understood as eternal life. This is permanent, eternal (obviously by its name), and unchanging, despite our sin, lifestyle choices, or even our unbelief (John 10:27-30; Rom 8:31-39; 1 Cor 6:9-10; Gal 5:21; Eph 5:5; 2 Tim 2:13).

Moving forward, Paul uses the personal inclusive pronoun “we” here, including himself and again demonstrates that he has not strayed from the mindset of writing to the church as a body of believers in the corporate sense. As before, Paul’s inclusion of himself shows equal footing before the Lord regarding this church-wide truth. The verb “are” speaks of a present tense reality, while the pronoun “His” is in the genitive, making it possessive. These observations are not meant to be tedious, but to show that all believers, being the Church collective, are presently God’s possession, which is described in particular with the word “workmanship.”

What does it mean to be God’s “workmanship?” This is a very suggestive and beautiful description of what the Church has been crafted into by God, but the word “workmanship” entails much more than what we may initially think. The word for “workmanship” is poiēma from which we derive our English word “poem.” This word means, “that which is made, work, creation.” It found in Romans 1:20 when speaking of God crafting the creation which testifies to His presence and glory, and serves as the basis for general revelation. In our present passage, Paul should be understood as conveying a divinely crafted work or carefully created thing. This is the Church. Lincoln brings some excellent observances to the fore:

In the LXX ποίημα (poiēma) frequently refers to the creation as God’s work (e.g., LXX Ps 91:4; 142:5), as it does in its only other use in the NT in Rom 1:20. Here, however, as the context and particularly the following clause make clear, the reference is to believers as God’s new creation. In Paul’s letters believers are regarded as God’s work (cf. Rom 14:20 and Phil 1:6). In Ephesians the writer has been talking of God’s power at work for believers (1:19). He can now say that his readers not only benefit from that work but as new creatures are themselves the product of that work. The stress in the Greek is on the first word in the clause, αὐτοῦ, “his.” The force is that it is God, not the readers themselves, who has made them what they are as believers.

The Body of Christ is God’s carefully crafted “masterpiece,” as seen in the NLT. The Jerusalem Bible has translated this word as a “work of art,” with the NET opting for “His creative work,” while the HCSB and LEB have “His creation.” Wuest has chosen “handiwork” for his translation. If we were to contemplate the beauty of a poem by Robert Frost, or if we were to stand in silence before “Starry Night” by Van Gogh, we would begin to scratch the surface of a carefully crafted work that is meant to capture one’s attention and to redirect one’s conversation. Such displays are meant to affect those who see it. They are meant to leave an impression. They are meant to communicate something, though the author of the work may not be readily seen. It is thus with the Church. The Church is to radiate the marks, moldings, and fashioning of the Creator, being the object of His special investment, and a supernatural labor of His divine love.

Due to the understanding that Paul is addressing the church as a whole, the word “workmanship” is singular, referring to the unified body of believers. While every human being is created in the image and likeness of God (Gen 1:26), it is the regenerate person who is instantaneously assimilated into a unified whole which is God’s divinely created work. This is not an individual designation but something that is conclusive of the Body of Christ as a whole.

An important connection that cannot be missed is the link between the Church being God’s masterpiece by grace (Eph 2:10) and the Church being the trophies of grace in the “age to come,” which demonstrate His superior riches and kindness toward believers (Eph 2:7). God has done something both incredible and unusual with the Church and He has done so by means of His grace! Hawley writes, “This is all based upon the amazing thing that God has done in taking this shabby group of individuals, living in bondage to the Adversary, and by grace creating from them the very Body of Christ (Eph 2:6; 15-16), the dwelling place of the living God (2:21-22).” The difference between these verses is not in relation to their spiritual glory, but in relation to time. At this present moment, the Church is God’s poem, and this will still be true in eternity. But the present time does not fully display the “surpassing riches of His grace in kindness toward us in Christ Jesus” (Eph 2:7b), being reserved as a testimony for the ages to come. What is breathtaking about both realities is that they are equally a reality rooted in His marvelous grace! Therefore, they are both reasons to praise His holy Name!

Paul states that the Church is God’s masterpiece “created” in Christ Jesus. The word “created” is ktizō which means, “to bring something into existence, create, in our literature of God’s creative activity.” This word is passive, meaning that the Church did not bring itself into existence, but that God is the One doing the work. Such a creation is only possible post-conversion. The unbeliever is without spiritual life and is in no way a candidate for this “masterpiece” designation. One must first be given new life, which only comes by being “in Christ Jesus” (Eph 2:10b) because eternal life is found only in Him and can never be granted apart from Him. When the new birth takes place at the moment of faith, we are at that moment a new creation in Christ. Seeing that Paul is addressing the church in Ephesus (and therefore this stands as truth for all who believe in Jesus), it is important that we keep in mind that believers are a holistic community of new creations in Christ.

Paul speaks to this doctrine in 2 Corinthians 5:17-19 when he writes:

Therefore if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creature; the old things passed away; behold, new things have come. Now all these things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation, namely, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not counting their trespasses against them, and He has committed to us the word of reconciliation.

Paul also states in Galatians 6:14-16,

But may it never be that I would boast, except in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, through which the world has been crucified to me, and I to the world. For neither is circumcision anything, nor uncircumcision, but a new creation. And those who will walk by this rule, peace and mercy be upon them, and upon the Israel of God.”

As connected to the concept in Ephesians 2:9, all boasting is to be in the work of the cross of Christ. It alone is the effectual work and He alone, by the power of this redeeming work, can impart life eternal to all who believe. The outward showing of the flesh has no bearing on the power of God in making human beings a new creation in Christ His Son. Such concerns make the performances or contributions of men and women the decisive factor, while the means by which the new creation has been imparted to the believer by God is cast to the wayside, without any serious entertainment as to the difference that now exists in the person’s life. At the moment of faith, one is regenerated (given spiritual life- Titus 3:5, born from above- John 3:3) and deemed a new creation. Seeing that we believers have been graced with a brand new life, this blessed basis would be the cause of why we are to reorient our daily living and choices to that of this new life.

Being created “in Christ Jesus” is for the purpose of “good works” (Eph 2:10c). This means that the Church is performing the works that God has previously assigned to them. Max Anders writes:

God has prepared a path of good works for Christians which he will bring about in and through them while they walk by faith. This does not mean that we do a good work for God. It means that God does a good work through us as we are faithful and obedient to him. God is at work. In faith we join him in that work to the praise of his glory (see 1:6, 12, 14).

Anders point deserves repeating. It is not that the Church is doing good works for God. That would be to bring our best efforts before Him with the intention of earning His approval or securing His acceptance. Sadly, this is how many believers live, and this is what many denominations teach. But these works are God’s works, of which He desires to play out in the Church when they are operating in reliance upon Him. This concept is so simple, but in our “self-sufficient,” “you can do it” age, we are often overcome by pride and ego, burdening ourselves with things that would not qualify as God’s good works that He has prepared for the Church. Our sinful tendency is to solve it, fix it, work at it, do it, nail it, kill it and drag it home, and “knock it out of the park,” and we will gladly receive the accolades when the job is done. This is not the biblical means of execution of good works that are pleasing to God. Let me repeat, these good works are His works that He works out through the Church.

“How does this work?” one may ask. If we have pondered the cross for any time at all, our affection for the Lord Jesus has grown and our desire to live in a way that is pleasing to Him will flourish. This is the beginning of what is known as sanctification. This is where our minds and hearts are being progressively changed by the Holy Spirit Who indwells us, stemming from our interactions with Word of God in study and meditation. The result is that we begin to find sin detestable and obedience desirable. What has been gravely mistaken when comprehending sanctification is that it is by our works. This is altogether untrue and should be corrected permanently in our minds as quickly as possible. Just as we came into an eternal relationship with the Father by faith in the Son, so we grow in our fellowship with the Father by faith as well.

The Apostle Paul summed it up this way:

For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything, but faith working through love. -Galatians 5:6

The great concern in Galatians is their coming into relationship by faith in Christ but then concluding that it was by keeping the Law of Moses that they were to grow and mature (Gal 3:3). One cannot begin in the Spirit and grow by the flesh, and it didn’t matter how much foreskin that they removed in order to keep things kosher (Gal 5:11-12), this did not bring them into a greater experience of fellowship with the Lord. So, if we cannot work our way into a greater intimacy with God, how does one gain greater intimacy with the Lord and what role DO works play seeing that there are imperative throughout the New Testament. I believe that Smith unfolds this well for our understanding:

All that we claim, then, in this life of sanctification that by an act of faith we put ourselves into the hands of the Lord, for Him to work in us all the good pleasure of His will, and then, by a continuous exercise of faith, keep ourselves there. This is our part in the matter. And when we do it, and while we do it, we are, in the Scripture sense, truly pleasing to God, although it may require years of training and discipline to mature us into a vessel that shall be in all respects to His honor, and fitted to every good work.

Our part is the trusting; it is His to accomplish the results. And when we do our part, He never fails to do His, for no one ever trusted in the Lord and was confounded. Do not be afraid, then, that, if you trust, or tell others to trust, the matter will end there. Trust is the beginning and the continuing foundation; but when we trust, the Lord works, and His work is the important part of the whole matter. And this explains that apparent paradox which puzzles so many. They say, “In one breath you tell us to do nothing but trust, and in the next you tell us to do impossible things. How can you reconcile such contradictory statements?” They are to be reconciled, just as we reconcile the statements concerning a saw in a carpenter’s shop, when we say, at one moment, that the saw has sawn asunder a log, and the next moment declare that the carpenter has done it. The saw is the instrument used; the power that uses it is the carpenter’s. And so we, yielding ourselves unto God, and our members as instruments of righteousness unto Him, find that He works in us to will and to do of His good pleasure, and we can say with Paul, “I labored . . . yet not I, but the grace of God which was with me” (1 Corinthians 15:10).

In the divine order, God’s working depends upon our cooperation. Of our Lord it was declared that at a certain place He could do there no mighty work because of their unbelief. It was not that He would not, but He could not. I believe we often think of God that He will not, when the real truth is that He cannot. Just as the potter, however skillful, cannot make a beautiful vessel out of a lump of clay that is never put into his hands, so neither can God make out of me a vessel unto His honor, unless I put myself into His hands. My part is the essential correlation of God’s part in the matter of my salvation; and as God is sure to do His part all right, the vital thing for me is to find out what my part is, and then do it.

What is the part of the believer in sanctification? Trust. Trusting God. Believing that He can do the work necessary and even believing that He can do the work though us if we simply place ourselves into His mighty hands. Oh, that the Church of God would cease striving and fighting, planning and vision-casting, and simply get it straight that resting by faith in Father of our Lord Jesus is the pathway to dynamic, supernatural living as the Body of Christ!

How many churches have shipwrecked their faith unknowingly due to the personal preferences of preferred congregants? How many opportunities have been squandered due to the fleshly leanings of the “logical” approach? Could we calculate the ineffectiveness of the Church’s power simply because we could not be brought to the point of saying, “Have Thy Own way, Lord; Have They Own way?” Remarkably, these scenarios are commonplace in congregations today. The Body of Christ has often been tortured again and again by internal squabbles and politics, self-centered attitudes and the throwing of one’s weight, biting and devouring one another to the point of consuming the local assembly (Gal 5:15). And we wonder why the power of the Lord is not displayed in His masterpiece. We wonder why His love is not testifying to the world of the presence of His disciples (John 13:34-45). We can’t understand why more are not coming to faith in Jesus Christ while our unity is fractional and injured (John 17:21). Supernatural works having been done by God through His people are scarce if at all present. The Church is its own greatest hinderance because it will not get out of God’s way and get onto God’s pre-set agenda.

God has taken the time before the Church came into existence to set forth a plentitude of good works as a path for us to tread upon. How should we understand the phrase “prepared beforehand?” There is a great deal of assumption that can take place with a phrase like this. Some have concluded that these good works were prepared before the foundation of the world was laid, or before we were born. Some commentators, like Lenski (p. 426) have translated this phrase as “prepared in advance,” while others like Robertson have understood this as “afore prepared.” Some have simply used the word “ordained.” The only other New Testament usage of this word (proetoimazō) is used in Romans 9:23, being translated as “prepared beforehand” in the NASB95. The apostle is not time specific here, so it is fruitless to debate the matter. Each theological bent will surely add their flavor to the matter in order to strengthen their system of thought, but I believe that we would be better to not squabble over trying to pinpoint a time in history past that the omniscient Lord saw fit to carve out the niche for each particular local assembly and recognize that if God has done so, we ought to be diligent in walking the path that He has made.

It should be clear that certainty of follow through is not the point of this verse. Good works are now possible for the believer in Christ. But now that good works are a possibility for the believer, this does not mean that they are automatic for the believer. Hodges has observed this as well in stating, “The Greek phrase in Ephesians 2:10 (‘that we should walk in them’) is exactly the same kind of phrase as is found in John 3:17 (‘that the world through Him might be saved’). In neither text do we find that there is any kind of guarantee that the stated purpose will be fulfilled.” While many have understood 2:10 to be the authenticating result of 2:8-9 (meaning that good works will prove the reality of one’s faith), it would be nothing short of dangerous to assume such a conclusion. Rather, works are a result that takes place due to the already secured and unshakable foundation of a “by grace through faith” salvation rooted solely in the work of Christ. Constable writes, “We do not need to do good works to merit salvation, but we should do good works because we have received salvation. This is God’s plan for the believer.” With this we cannot argue.

In the Scriptures, there are instances where this concept is clearly conveyed. For instance, both 1 Corinthians 3:1-4 and Hebrews 5:11-14 demonstrate a frustration with believers who were not growing when they should have been able to apply the Word of God to their life’s situation so that they would walk in discernment (Heb 5:14). Yet, neither author questioned the validity of their recipient’s salvation. Their failure in growth was the issue at hand, not the validity of their new life in Christ. This issue placed the responsibility for their failure to grow solely upon them. God, in His grace, has already supplied fully and freely all that the Body of Christ needs in order to grow up into salvation (1 Pet 2:2). Those who were in Corinth were deemed “fleshly” by Paul (1 Cor 3:3) and deemed to be “infants in Christ” due to their jealousy, strife, and divisions (1 Cor 3:1c, 3, 4). The believers in the Epistle to the Hebrews should have been seeking to move past the “elementary principles” (Heb 5:12) that they had been taught. In both instances, each author is taken aback due to the slow progress of their growth in the Lord.

When Paul says that we should “walk” in these previously prepared, carefully crafted good works, he uses the word peripateō which means “to live or behave in a customary manner, with possible focus upon continuity of action—‘to live, to behave, to go about doing.’” These good works that are now a possibility for the Church are a new way of living due to the “newness of life” (Rom 6:4) that every believer has been raised to, which Christ has made possible through His sacrifice. It is the way by which the Church ought to conduct their affairs, which is clearly contrasted with the ways of this world. We can understand this due to the inclusio that the apostle has set up in connection with Ephesians 2:2, when the Church was characterized in their spiritually dead estate “in which you formerly walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience.” The pivotal nature of the grace of God (Eph 2:5, 8) has granted new life to the believer and has created the masterpiece known as the Church.

Now the question may linger. If trusting in the Lord wholly is what I am responsible for doing, and if He is the One who will do all of the work either in, around, or through His Church, what are these works going to look like? How will the Church know that they are from God when they occur? Thankfully, the Bible gives us a two-part answer that goes hand-in-hand with one another.

The first of God’s “good work” that will occur in the Church will fall under the category of evangelism. “The fruit of the righteous is a tree of life, and he who is wise wins souls” -Proverbs 11:30. When righteousness is cultivated among believers, it becomes infectious! Though the events at Calvary were brutal and full of sorrow, it was from such an act of obedience on behalf of our Lord that the saving message was secured once for all. “Faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ” (Rom 10:17). Do we not see the apostles spreading the message of the gospel of grace in Acts? These men ventured forward in faith, telling everyone that they could about the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ by the power of the Father (Acts 2:23-24; 3:15, 26; 4:2, 10, 33; 5:30; 10:39-43; 13:26-39; 17:31; 23:6; 26:8, 16-18). It was by this message that many came to faith in Christ (Acts 2:41; 8:12, 35-36; 10:44; 16:14-15, 30-31). It is this same message that saves today. If we are to be confident in declaring that we are doing “God’s work,” then we must be about telling others of the love of God in giving His Son Jesus on the cross of Calvary. We must be calling men and women to faith in Christ. We must be about winning souls.

The second of God’s “good work” that occurs among the Body of Christ is known as discipleship. This was the very heart of our Lord as can be seen in Matthew 28:18-20 when He commissioned over 500 people to go about their lives with the purpose of making disciples, baptizing them and teaching them to observe what Jesus had commanded. This is precisely Paul’s modus operandi since Barnabas retrieved him in Acts 11. We read,

And he left for Tarsus to look for Saul; and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. And for an entire year they met with the church and taught considerable numbers; and the disciples were first called Christians in Antioch. -Acts 11:25-26

Spending quality time with other believers and communicating the truths of God’s Word is God’s work. It is the process of getting His Word before men and women and encouraging them to trust Him with the daily decisions of life. It is explaining what God is like over and over again. It is committing souls to prayer and teaching those souls how to pray just as our Lord did with His disciples (Luke 11:1). It is carrying those who are willing alongside us in life’s situations and displaying the love of Christ to others for them to see, modeling Jesus for them and encouraging them to follow along (John 1:43; Acts 16:3). Discipleship has suffered from the hour-long teaching session and meeting over coffee for too long. That is not discipleship. It is not what Jesus modeled. LeRoy Eims speaks to this matter:

Jesus was available to His men. The Eternal Word became audible, visible, and touchable. They were close to Him. They were chosen to be with Him, but always for the grand purpose of preparing them for their ministry. He designed His training so that their lives should bring forth lasting fruit. He did not prepare them to go out to a life of secluded fellowship with one another, so He did not prepare them in a secluded fellowship.

I have made mistakes in this regard. I have tried to train men by gathering them together in a quiet basement once a week to discuss the Christian life and then supplement this with occasional seminars or special meetings. It didn’t work. But men who have ministered with me in the push and shove of life, out where we face victory and defeat daily, out in the world of real living, are today productive for Christ. I have watched them bear fruit that remains.

One final note that may be obvious to most: Proper discipleship includes the teaching, training, and demonstrating to the one being discipled on how to evangelize the lost. The goal in discipleship is certainly growth, but the means of growing must include sharing the gospel or they will not grow in a balanced fashion. Growing believers are growing because they have been encouraged to do God’s work, and God’s work involves the two categories of evangelism and discipleship.

Benefits of Obedience and Good Works

In the Christian life there are countless opportunities for faithfulness and obedience. This extends to everything from one’s priorities all the way down to the company that you choose to keep. While many throughout Christian history have touted good works as a means of salvation, the Bible tells us that works are a beneficial avenue in life that was not previously available to us because we were apart from Christ our Lord. As Hoyt has recorded, “Salvation is never conditioned upon human merit (cf. Eph 2:8-9 and Ti[tus] 3:5) but solely upon faith apart from works.” But just as our “by grace through faith” salvation is the gift of God, so we see that these previously prepared works for the Body of Christ are by His gracious will as well. If God has taken the time to prepare good works for the Christian, we must be further convinced as to why we should walk in them. I believe that Westcott captures our most blessed situation.

The Christian is a new creation (2 Cor 5:17), not alone and independent, but in Christ: he is not left to self-chosen activity, but set for the accomplishment of definite works which God has made ready for his doing: his works are prepared, and so the fulfilment of his particular duty is made possible; and still it is necessary that he should accept it with that glad obedience which is perfect freedom.

It is obvious from the examples cited above that Christians do not automatically do good works and must be exhorted to do so time and time again. Even in Titus 3:14, we read Paul’s instructions for the church in Crete when he writes, “Our people must also learn to engage in good deeds to meet pressing needs, so that they will not be unfruitful.” Consistently exhorting the flock of God to good works is necessary so that they will “not be unfruitful.” How important it is to consider the benefits of obedience and the good works that our Creator has prepared.

1. Obedience leads to great rewards at the Judgment Seat of Christ.

We are told in 2 Corinthians 5:10 that “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each one may be recompensed for his deeds in the body, according to what he has done, whether good or bad.” The more that we have trusted God and His Word in our actions and decisions, the more that it will be reflected in our evaluation before King Jesus. Our deeds are taken into account and will be evaluated. “What he has done, whether good or bad” will be under the Lord’s consideration and He will award us accordingly.

This evaluation is often understood as an “individual Christian” review only (of which 1 Cor 3:10-15 would show), but in 2 Corinthians 5:11, Paul’s point can be understood as the possibility of a local assembly presentation before the Judgment Seat as well. It reads, “Therefore, knowing the fear of the Lord, we persuade men, but we are made manifest to God; and I hope that we are made manifest also in your consciences.” Why would Paul use the personal inclusive pronoun of “we” in speaking of persuading men? This means that there is a large group effort to convince fellow believers to live faithful lives in love and good deeds. Christians would not be persuading unbeliever to live faithfully, for they have no spiritual capacity to do so. Rather, this is a local church endeavor, understanding the seriousness of the event when the Corinthian Church will appear before the Lord.

We also find that our application of sound doctrine will be evaluated before the Lord. Paul speaks to the Corinthian Church’s failure to grow beyond infancy in their understanding of the doctrines of Christ (1 Cor 3:1-3). The text is clear that every believer has a common foundation in Jesus Christ (1 Cor 3:11), but it is equally clear in the proceeding verses that one is responsible for how he or she builds on this foundation and that the materials involved are not based on quantity, but quality (1 Cor 3:12-15). Every believer is responsible to know the Word of God and to dispense the Word of God (Heb 5:12). Samuel Hoyt writes, “Although the interpretation of this passage is that the materials refer to doctrines, there seems to be justification for application to Christian service in general. Not only does Paul refer to Christian leaders in particular, he also alludes to Christians in general, who have a part in building the church through the ministry of their individual spiritual gifts.” Many have mistakenly viewed their works as the only thing to be considered at the believer’s evaluation, but it is clear that we have a responsibility to know the Word of God and to grow in our understanding. This growth is only possible in seeking the Lord for it with a humble spirit, for only He grants growth to the Christian (1 Cor 3:6; Heb 6:3).

The understanding and reality of the Judgment Seat of Christ keeps the believer aware of the realities of one day being present before the King. It is a tool for living soberly (Matt 24:45-51). Rewards are not a selfish motive to obey Christ but are a means of demonstrating His glory because they speak of the believer’s trust in His Savior and Lord over the schemes and devices of this world. Should we not ask of the Lord, “What will you have our local assembly to do?” A unified cry of this manner unleashes the power of God as manifest through Christ’s Body.

2. Obedience keeps us in fellowship with God.

Having fellowship with the Creator is a great privilege that has been made available to us by the death of the Lord Jesus Christ. When we are involved with sin, our fellowship with Him is disrupted. While our relationship with God will always be intact (John 3:16; 5:24), our fellowship with Him can become skewed. Communication and the reception of His Word and the leading of the Spirit begin to breakdown due to the interference of ongoing rebellion against Him. This is where 1 John 1:9 becomes vital in the Christian life.

“If we confess our sins, He is faithful and righteous to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.”

When we find ourselves out of fellowship with the Lord, we can be sure that it is because of a lack of obedience on our part. Confession is a recognition of our wrongs that is saying the same thing about our choices and thoughts that God says about them: namely, that they are sin! Utilizing confession is meant to bring about an attitude of humility. It is the hardened heart that refuses to come to God for cleansing from the unrighteousness that is calcifying our souls. This is where the Body of Christ must come in, exhorting the believer to look past sin and self and look again unto Jesus. James tells us,

My brethren, if any among you strays from the truth and one turns him back, let him know that he who turns a sinner from the error of his way will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.

The Body of Christ is to be involved in one another’s walk with the Lord. Confessing our sin (admitting that we are wrong to God and declaring that He is right) restores the fellowship and rectifies the disruption, and we are once again walking in fellowship with Him, being receptive to His will and to His Word.

Once one finds themselves in fellowship with the Lord, obedience becomes one of the highest priorities. It must be stated again, good works are not a means of earning acceptance with God but are a result of His unconditional acceptance of us now that we are in Christ by faith. When speaking to the eleven shortly before His betrayal, Jesus said:

He who has My commandments and keeps them is the one who loves Me; and he who loves Me will be loved by My Father, and I will love him and will disclose Myself to him. -John 14:21

By being in fellowship with the Lord Jesus, their obedience was something that demonstrated their love for Him, and when their obedience flowed with consistency, greater depths of fellowship and intimacy would occur. These men standing before Jesus would be the beginning blocks of the Church when its inception would take place in Acts 2, so His teaching on experiencing the depths of intimacy with the Father would be necessary as their sought to carry the gospel message to untouched realms. This brings us to an honest question. Do we love the Lord Jesus? Why not put off our sin “that so easily entangles us” (Heb 12:1b) so that we can live as those who are a constant expression of love towards Jesus Christ our Lord?

3. Obedience brings about blessing.

The idea of God bringing about a blessing is something that has been largely underrated in the Christian’s life mostly because it has been assumed that He will bless everyone regardless. May it be clearly stated that God does not bless sin. But the fact that God blesses the obedient saint is found throughout the Word of God. In Genesis, we see that God blesses Abraham because he did not withhold Isaac from Him (Gen 22:16-18). In Deuteronomy 28:1-14, we find nothing but blessing for the children of Israel if they are faithful to do all that the Lord has commanded them. Here is a sampling, but I encourage you to read the entire chapter.

Now it shall be, if you diligently obey the Lord your God, being careful to do all His commandments which I command you today, the Lord your God will set you high above all the nations of the earth. All these blessings will come upon you and overtake you if you obey the Lord your God: Blessed shall you be in the city, and blessed shall you be in the country. Blessed shall be the offspring of your body and the produce of your ground and the offspring of your beasts, the increase of your herd and the young of your flock. Blessed shall be your basket and your kneading bowl. Blessed shall you be when you come in, and blessed shall you be when you go out. (Deut 28:1-6).

Even poor Job was blessed for his faithfulness unto the Lord. We read in Job 42:12-13: “The Lord blessed the latter days of Job more than his beginning; and he had 14,000 sheep and 6,000 camels and 1,000 yoke of oxen and 1,000 female donkeys. He had seven sons and three daughters.” Job had lost so much in the first few opening chapters, yet he did not curse God over his situation. Lastly, we see Cain in Genesis 4:1-7. While the Lord was merciful toward Cain after he killed his brother Abel (Gen 4:15), Cain did not have to end up in exile. Being gracious, the Lord reasoned with Cain after his offering was deemed unacceptable (4:5). In Genesis 4:6-7 we read, “Then the Lord said to Cain, “Why are you angry? And why has your countenance fallen? If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is crouching at the door; and its desire is for you, but you must master it.’” (emphasis added). Cain only had to do well, he only had to obey the encouragement and wisdom that the Lord was giving him and he would have been “accepted” by God. Yet, we know that Cain chose to kill his brother instead. How different things would have been if Cain would have obeyed the Lord.

4. Obedience keeps communication with God open.

Psalm 66:18 says, “If I regard wickedness in my heart, The Lord will not hear.” If one fails to confess sin and decides to indulge in it, they can expect to have their prayers hindered. God will not look favorably on disobedience, especially from those who have had a great amount of revelation in their lives. We see this example with Abraham when he conceives a child with Hagar the maidservant. We are told, “So Hagar bore Abram a son; and Abram called the name of his son, whom Hagar bore, Ishmael. Abram was eighty-six years old when Hagar bore Ishmael to him (Gen 16:15-16; emphasis added). We then are told in the very next verse, “Now when Abram was ninety-nine years old, the Lord appeared to Abram and said to him, ‘I am God Almighty; Walk before Me, and be blameless. I will establish My covenant between Me and you, And I will multiply you exceedingly.’” (Gen 17:1-2; emphasis added). Did you catch what happened? Due to Abraham’s sin, God did not speak to him for 13 years! This had to be traumatic for Abraham seeing that God is the one who called him out of his homeland and made numerous promises to him (Gen 12:1-3; 15:5, 18-21; 17:5-10).

This concept can also be seen in a similar fashion in a pronouncement against husbands in 1 Peter 3:7. Peter tells husbands, “You husbands in the same way, live with your wives in an understanding way, as with someone weaker, since she is a woman; and show her honor as a fellow heir of the grace of life, so that your prayers will not be hindered” (emphasis added). If you are not living with your wife in an understanding way and you have neglected to show her honor and to view her properly, your prayers will be arrested before the Lord. He will not respond. And is it not our marriages that need prayer the most, being a prime target for the enemy, suffering invasion, indoctrination, and assault from every angle. Most parents feel like they are hanging on by a thread. Men, we cannot afford to compromise our situation with God by mistreating our one flesh companions. Our ladies are worth our best and our obedience is worth the time, forethought, and effort because the blessing of God is worth having in our lives and marriages.

Before closing this section, one final passage must be considered.

Now in a large house there are not only gold and silver vessels, but also vessels of wood and of earthenware, and some to honor and some to dishonor. Therefore, if anyone cleanses himself from these things, he will be a vessel for honor, sanctified, useful to the Master, prepared for every good work. -2 Timothy 2:20-21

The large house in focus is the Church. There are many different type of people in the Church. Some are ready to rest in the Master’s hand, looking for Him to have His way with them. Others are waiting on the shelf, hoping that the Master will pass them by so that they won’t have to be disturbed with His business. Some are on the shelf because of their love of sinful pleasures in their lives. The passage before us is clear that it doesn’t have to be that way. A vessel, a carefully crafted work, can easily move from the realms of “wood” and “earthenware” if they would simply cleanse themselves from such sins (as mentioned in 2 Timothy 2:14-18). They would then be “sanctified,” which means “set apart.” They would be an honorable vessel, like those made of gold or silver. They would be useful in God’s hands because they have seen that His hands are the greatest resting place for the believer in Christ.

What are you made of? What type of vessel are you? Is your assessment comfortable? Is your conscience clear? Or do you need to confess your sins to the Lord and place yourself in the Master’s hand, trusting Him to work through you for His glory? Imagine a local church body that sought their Master’s hand upon them at every moment. Imagine what God could do!

The Gift of God- Ephesians 2:8-9

*This particular section of the commentary carries extended footnotes that are not able to be transferred into this format. If this is something that you would like to obtain in hard copy form for your personal notes, please e-mail gracebibleportage@gmail.com and request the full notes for Ephesians 2:8-9. You will receive a return attachment with the notes in PDF form. Thank you.

Ephesians 2:8-9

One Saturday morning, I was perusing through a copy of the local newspaper. Every Saturday this particular paper has a “Faith & Values” section containing the latest news about local congregations or featuring some form of charity taking place that coming week. The obligatory “Events” section is usually followed by a Bill Graham question and answer column, and so on. However, on the front of the “Faith & Values” page, I found an article that caught my attention immediately entitled, “Grace Is Not Cheap; We Should Pay Dearly For It.” The blog reads as follows:

There are few men I admire as much as Billy Graham. I first heard him preach in 1970 at Cowboys Stadium in Irving, Texas. The legendary teams of Tom Landry had not yet played in the stadium which was in its last stages of construction. I listened to Tom Landry share his own testimony of faith in Christ, then sat with more than 50,000 others in rapt silence as Dr. Graham preached. At the close of the service, thousands flooded the aisles and came forward in response to his invitation to trust Christ.

On Sunday evenings, I listened to Dr. Graham’s radio broadcast, The Hour of Decision, and I read most, if not all, of his books. Throughout his ministry he avoided the excess of other evangelists, placing himself on a limited salary and avoiding scandal. I watched him join hands with Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. in support of racial integration.

Every President since Harry Truman has sought him for counsel and prayer, both Democrat and Republican. Some tried to use their friendship for political advantage, others credited him with strengthening their faith. He is now 94 years old and lives at his home in Montreat, North Carolina where a few friends and nurses attend him since his wife's death six years ago.

Thirty years ago, when he was already in his sixties, Dr. Graham reflected on his evangelistic ministry and asked some sobering questions. “I look back on my many years as an evangelist, and I wonder, have I made the Christian faith look too easy? … Of course our salvation is a result of what Christ has done for us in His life and death and resurrection, not what we can do for ourselves. Of course, we can trust Him to complete in us what He has begun. But in my eagerness to give away God’s great gift, have I been honest about the price He paid in His war with evil? And have I adequately explained the price we must pay in our own war against evil at work in and around our lives?”

Last year my wife and I spent the summer in Nuremberg, Germany working with a new church. While I was there I read Eric Metaxas’ biography of Dietrich Bonhoeffer. Before he was martyred by Adolph Hitler, Bonhoeffer raised similar questions in his book, The Cost of Discipleship.

Bonhoffer wrote, “Cheap grace is the deadly enemy of our Church. We are fighting today for costly grace. … Above all, it is costly because it cost God the life of his Son: ‘ye were bought with a price,’ and what has cost God much cannot be cheap for us.” Speaking of his generation, Bonhoeffer wrote, “We poured forth unending streams of grace. But the call to follow Jesus in the narrow way was hardly ever heard.”

Billy Graham’s probing reflections on his ministry and Dietrich Bonhoeffer’s prophetic book written during Hitler’s rise to power raise questions about our own faith. Have we responded to Jesus’ invitation to follow Him? Are we His disciples? Are we seeking to keep His commandments in all our relationships at home, at school, at church and at work? Are we opting for cheap grace that costs us nothing or are we embracing costly grace that cost God his Son?

A few points strike me as troublesome. First, it is interesting that there is no citation of Scripture, either in the text or in support of the author’s conclusions. Second is the confusing nature of what it is to believe in Christ (justification) and what it is to follow Christ (sanctification), which is a common mistake found all throughout Christianity today. But the most disheartening thing was that the Biblical picture of “grace” has been greatly distorted to unrecognizable proportions. Our day and age has lost the essence of biblical “grace,” and in doing so, it has been ultimately turned into works; something that the Apostle Paul abhorred, which moved him to write the book of Galatians. To say that we should pay dearly for grace is to fail in understanding Biblical grace altogether.

Sadly, this is not an isolated incident. Ian Giatti writes, “At least a third of senior pastors in the United States believe one can earn a place in Heaven by simply being a good person,” after his examination of a 2022 survey conducted by the Cultural Research Center of Arizona Christian University. It is no wonder that such unbiblical conclusions are being espoused. Two decades before, famed preacher John MacArthur asserted that “The gospel invitation is not an entreaty for sinners to allow the Savior into their lives. It is both an appeal and a command for them to repent and follow him. It demands not just passive acceptance of Christ but active submission to him as well.” Maybe you have come across some of the typical phrases that often accompany this works-based philosophy of redemption. Here are some examples:

“If you’re really saved, you will hate the things you once loved, and love the things that you once hated.”

“If you haven’t forsaken all of your sin, you were never really saved to begin with. You had a head belief, not a heart belief.”

“If you haven’t repented of all of your sin, you are not saved yet. You have to really quote/unquote mean business with God and repent of all your sins.”

“If you’re still desiring the things of the world, you are probably not saved.”

“You can’t go to heaven if you’re hanging on to the world.”

“If Christ is not Lord of all, He’s not Lord at all.”

“If you are practicing sin, you are not saved.”

“If you’ve grown cold towards the Lord, you were probably never truly saved to begin with.”

“If you do not endure and persevere as a Christian to the end of your life, you were never a real Christian to begin with, because all true Christians endure to the end.”

But does biblical faith consist of submission to Christ and following Him in order for eternal life and the forgiveness of sins to be a reality in eternity?

The quoted statements above are unbiblical to say the least. Justification (which is being declared “righteous” by God because of one’s faith in Jesus Christ) cannot be said to be an instantaneous event if good works are required in order to authenticate it. If you hold to the necessity of good works in order to validate one’s faith in Christ, then you believe that salvation is a process, being ultimately by works. This is a majority-view take on salvation in the twenty-first century and it is without biblical warrant or proof. This is where desperate clarity is needed when engaging the book of Ephesians, and especially 2:8-10.

Ephesians 2:8

Believers are trophies of God’s grace (Eph 2:7). We will be on full display, shown by God before the coming ages of history future as demonstrations of His immeasurable riches of kindness as to the glorious extents of His power (1:19) simply because we are in Christ. As we have observed throughout this letter so far, being in Christ qualifies us as automatic recipients of numerous undeserved blessings that we already possess in their totality. All of the riches that the Apostle Paul has unfolded in 1:3-14, the epignōsis truths found in 1:17-19, and our undeserved, exalted position alongside Jesus Christ in the other dimension of the heavenlies (2:6) are shown to be acts of God’s grace toward believing sinners.

With Ephesians 2:8, we immediately notice the word “for” (gar), which serves as a coordinating conjunction that elaborates on the idea that was previously stated in 2:5 when he burst forth with the glorious truth, “by grace you have been saved.” (It should also be noted that the use of the word “grace” finds connection with “the surpassing riches of His grace in kindness” as seen in 2:7b.) The word “for” should serve as a mental prod for us to keep the preceding context in mind. “So important is ‘grace’ that he not only repeats the parenthetical statement but now amplifies it as an explanation of (gar) all that he says.” Having completed his thought on the eternal extents of the power of God toward us who believe (1:19b) in 2:7, Paul is now providing a detailed understanding of what was meant in the parenthetical portion of 2:5.

Grace

Now, what is “grace?” This has been touched upon previously, but our present passage and the popularity that has surrounded it demands a more precise definition. The word “grace” is the Greek word charis which means, “a beneficent disposition toward someone, favor, grace, gracious care/help, goodwill.” The ABP translates this word as “favor.” In the Scriptures, we see that Jesus Christ is full of “grace and truth” (John 1:14), and that “grace and truth” come through Him (John 1:17). We also see that “grace” is a notable favor of God that rests upon a people, always in the context of being undeserved (Acts 4:33; 6:8; 11:23; 13:43; Eph 3:2,7-8). The good news itself is understood as God’s grace (Acts 14:3; 15:11; 18:27; 20:24, 32). “Grace” is also considered a customary greeting of well-wishes (1 Cor 1:3; 2 Cor 1:2; Gal 1:3; Eph 1:2; Phil 1:2; Col 1:2; 1 Thess 1:1; 2 Thess 1:2; 1 Tim 1:2; 2 Tim 1:2; Titus 1:4; Phlm 1:3; 1 Pet 1:2; 2 Pet 1:2; Rev 1:4). God’s grace rescues the believer from any obligation to the Law (Rom 6:14), and within the sphere of works, we find no mixture with grace (Rom 11:6; Gal 2:21).

Grace is the unmerited favor of God being freely distributed upon those who are infinitely undeserving. YHWH is gracious. It is simply who He is in His very person! Tozer supplies some worthy contemplation on this matter, writing:

Grace is God’s goodness, the kindness of God’s heart, the good will, the cordial benevolence. It is what God is like. God is like that all the time. You’ll never run into a stratum in God that is hard. You’ll always find God gracious, at all times and toward all peoples forever. You’ll never run into any meanness in God, never any resentment or rancor or ill will, for there is none there. God has no ill will toward any being. God is a God of utter kindness and cordiality and good will and benevolence. And yet all of these work in perfect harmony with God’s justice and God’s judgment.

He distributes His grace freely, and He has done so most prominently in the provision of a sacrifice for the sins of every man, woman, and child that would ever live in the Person of His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ. God has no obligation to anyone to redeem the human race, but because of the motivation of His great love (Eph 2:4), He has chosen to pay the price for sin in full (John 19:30), drawing the human race to Himself through Christ (John 6:44; 12:32; cf. 3:14; 8:28). Any obligation in the matter is due to His character, His attributes, and His very being.

God cannot help but to love people, and He does not sit idly by when His creatures have chosen to plunge themselves headlong into spiritual calamity. His grace makes rescue a reality, His love motivates Him to get involved, and His Son perfectly bridges the gap between us.

MacDonald writes, “It all originates with the grace of God: He takes the initiative in providing it. Salvation is given to those who are utterly unworthy of it, on the basis of the Person and work of the Lord Jesus Christ.” What the sinner deserves is cast upon the Savior, and what the Savior is and always has been (righteous) is cast upon the sinner (2 Cor 5:21). This is grace!

Bing provides an excellent summary of the insurmountable blessing that is grace.

It simply means “free gift.” By free, we mean that it is totally undeserved; nothing that a person does, commits, surrenders, or promises can earn or merit grace. It is therefore an unconditional gift. By unconditional we mean that God, as the Giver of grace, does not put any such conditions on people before they can receive His gift. When someone tries to earn the gift of grace, it ceases to be grace.

He goes on to write,

Grace, then, is a gift given freely and without conditions. If we work for it, it is no longer grace but a wage, a paycheck for our work. When it comes to our eternal salvation, God does not pay wages. He gives eternal life only as a gift. When you receive a paycheck for a week of hard work, do you tell your employers, “Thanks so much for this wonderful blessing- I really don’t deserve it”? It’s more likely that you feel you deserve to be paid more!

Biblically, grace is understood as being free, as when Paul writes in Romans, that one is “justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus” (3:24-emphasis added). We also find that grace is something that must be received in order for one to benefit from it. God’s exercise of grace is seen in Christ dying for the sins of the world (John 1:29; 1 John 2:2). But just because the full payment for sin has been made does not mean that all are benefiting from its full payment. As Meisinger notes, “It is one thing to say that God in Christ no longer imputes sin to man (2 Cor 5:19), thus making sin a non-issue at the Great White Throne, and it is quite another to say that the world stands forgiven. The only place where forgiveness is available is ‘in Christ’ (Col 2:13-14).” And one is not “in Christ” until they have received the gospel message that Christ has died for our sins and has been raised from the grave. As Romans 5:17 tells us, “For if by the transgression of the one, death reigned through the one, much more those who receive the abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness will reign in life through the One, Jesus Christ” (emphasis added). This “receiving” of God’s free gift of grace is what is understood as “believing,” or “faith” (John 1:12).

As will be entertained in Ephesians 2:9, human works are incapable of holding a place in this divine arrangement. Grace and works are found to be incompatible much like oil and water. Paul, when speaking of God’s grace toward Israel as His beloved and privileged people writes, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works, otherwise grace is no longer grace” (Rom 11:6). Grace involves God’s prerogative while works emphasize man’s accomplishments. Grace finds superiority reaching up while works are the upward-reaching evidence of prideful and self-worthy individual unable to recognize the quicksand beneath them.

In his personal Bible, Moody recorded these meditations:

Works may be good crutches to go upon, but they are bad christs to lean upon.

Works magnify man, grace magnifies God. We had better let works go, and build alone upon free grace.

Good works may be our Jacob’s staff—to walk with on earth; but they never can be our Jacob’s ladder to climb up to heaven.

Faith

The word “faith” as used in Ephesians 2:8 is the Greek word “pistis” meaning a “state of believing on the basis of the reliability of the one trusted, trust, confidence, faith.” This lexical entry deserves careful attention because it shows “faith” to be one’s response to the reception of reliable information about “the one trusted,” being the Lord Jesus Christ, making Him the object of one’s faith. In using the word “object,” I am not promoting in any way the notion that Jesus Christ is common, insignificant, or meager, but I wish to convey that He alone is the sole focal point for which one’s faith is directed when it is exercised seeing that the information that has been ascertained about Him has created a firm conviction that He is one’s Savior from the penalty of sin, which is spiritual death. Since Matthew 1, this has been the revealed “content of faith” in which one is to place their faith.

This is no different than what can be seen in Genesis 15:6, where Moses writes, “Then he (Abram) believed in the Lord; and He reckoned it to him as righteousness.” In Abram’s dilemma, he calls out to the Lord for clarity regarding the promise of offspring (Gen 15:1-3). YHWH responds with an object lesson from the stars, stating that Abram’s descendants would be just as numerous. With this information provided, Abram responds in faith and is subsequently declared as “righteous” by Him. The content of Abram’s faith was not the Lord Jesus Christ but the Word of God as conveyed in the promise of future progeny (Gen 15:4-5). Some may deem this confusing, or even illogical, but Ryrie provides a clear analysis. “The basis of salvation in every age is the death of Christ; the requirement for salvation in every age is faith; the object of faith in every age is God; the content of faith changes in the various dispensations.” Regardless of God’s Word to Abram in the Old Testament, or the Lord Jesus Christ stating, “Truly, truly, I say to you, he who hears My word, and believes Him who sent Me, has eternal life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed out of death into life,” the requirement of “faith” remains the same. The progressive revelation of Scripture from the Old Testament to the New Testament has provided more content to the reader, just as the persons of the biblical accounts learned more over their lifetimes and beyond as to the precise “content of faith” in each dispensation when they were presently living.

The definition of “faith,” despite the passing of various dispensations, has not changed. Hoehner observes:

In the NT it is used 243 times, 142 times by Paul and eight times in Ephesians. Much study has been done on the word, but again it basically has the idea of “trust, reliance, faith.” As one who trusts in a chair for support because it is trustworthy, so one trusts in God’s gracious salvation because God is reliable or trustworthy. In short, one does not work to support oneself in the chair, nor does one work to obtain salvation. Rather, one relies on what God has accomplished in his Son at the cross 2000 years ago.

From this summation, we must make the obvious known. “Faith” in no way should be considered as the cause of salvation, nor does it stand as the basis of salvation. The basis is the shed blood of Jesus Christ and the cause is God’s initiative in sending His Son. “Faith” is simply the means by which the available salvation is appropriated to the one believing. Some have understood “faith” as the channel by which the benefits secured by Christ are supplied to the sinner.

In salvation, one does not bring anything to the table, save the sin that condemns him or her to the Lake of Fire. “Faith” is believing in the Son of God, Jesus Christ because He alone has paid in full the price for sin, thus being an all-sufficient sacrifice that requires nothing more to accomplish the task at hand. Both “faith” (pistis) and “believe” (pisteuō) speak to being persuaded or convicted (Rom 4:20-21) about something, which in the case of Christianity, that persuasion or conviction is concerning the Lord Jesus Christ due to His ability to save through His work on the cross. Again, He alone is the sole object of one’s faith. It is precisely the completed work of the cross and the glorious resurrection that testify to the factual credibility of Jesus as being the trustworthy object of salvation. For these precise reasons, we should understand that Jesus Christ is the “content of faith” (as per Ryrie) in this present Church Age Dispensation.

It is also vital to understand that “faith” is the only sufficient channel by which salvation can come to a sinner, seeing that it is a passive response that is devoid of works, wages, or merit. “The words, ‘through faith,” Wuest states, “speak of the instrument or means whereby the sinner avails himself of this salvation which God offers him in pure grace.” By God’s grace this salvation is provided fully and freely to the recipient, but one becomes a recipient of this salvation only by responding in faith. Let it be plainly stated that salvation is not cheap as some would categorize the notion of “cheap grace” but was costly, being measured by the earthly life and death of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

In providing an excellent summary, Hawley writes:

“Faith” and its verbal counterpart, “believe,” consist of nothing more than passively accepting certain propositions as true. We should not twist faith into something meritorious or give the impression that it has to impress God to result in salvation. Jesus saves, not faith. Even the feeblest faith that is persuaded of the truth in Christ is sufficient for Jesus to save the lowest of sinners.

Any claims of “disingenuous faith,” “little faith,” or “false faith” should only be seen as such because the proper object of the Lord Jesus is not in view. It is not the degree of faith that one responds with that would result in a false conversion, but a failure to respond with the smallest amount of faith in the trustworthy object of Jesus Christ. The focus in salvation must remain on the Savior, not the one needing salvation.

Salvation

When we read that it is by “grace you have been saved through faith,” we must recognize that there has also been a great deal of confusion regarding the concept of what salvation actually entails. In BDAG, the definitions of the words “saved” and “salvation” are:

1. “to preserve or rescue from natural dangers and afflictions, save, keep from harm, preserve, rescue”

2. “to save or preserve from transcendent danger or destruction, save/preserve from eternal death”

Therefore, we see clearly that there are many possible meanings of the word “saved,” but as has been previously stated, the surrounding context determines the meaning. When one makes the mistake of reading the same meaning into a word every time that they read it, this practice is called an illegitimate totality transfer. This neglects the context of the passage at hand (regardless of what the literature is) and makes an assumption upon the text due to the reader’s biases or viewpoint and not due to the author’s original intent in writing.

With Ephesians 2:8, we must consider the context of 2:1-3, speaking of our time of being “dead” spiritually before we knew the Gospel of Christ, and 2:4-7 when we were “made alive” spiritually by the grace of God. So we see that what the Apostle Paul means in using the word “saved” is that we were “made alive” by God when we believed in Jesus Christ. Again, the cardinal rule comes to the forefront: The surrounding context should always determine the meaning for us. We do not need to speculate or guess at the author’s meaning. Paul is plain in this passage. We simply need to accept what he has put forth under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.

At this point, we now deal with another common assumption that has created theological dividing lines within evangelical Christendom. This quote from Barnhouse sets forth the dilemma.

God is the source, grace the stream; Christ’s blood is the ground or cause, His resurrection the proof. And now, the means by which the great and free gift is communicated to the individual. The water of life comes to us by the channel of faith. But we are not to think that we have dug this channel, for even faith is the gift of God (Eph 2:8) -emphasis added.

If “faith” is a gift from God, and a sinner can only be saved by “faith alone,” and only God can give “faith” to a person, how can the sinner ever be held responsible for not believing in Jesus as their Savior? If “faith” is a God-given gift to whomever He chooses, why does He not give this gift to everyone so that they can be saved if the Scriptures are clear that He loves everyone and desires for them to come to a knowledge of the truth (John 3:16; 1 Tim 2:4-6; Heb 2:9; 1 John 2:2)? The contradictions are self-evident.

“Faith” being a gift that only God can give to whomever He chooses is the position of those who would hold to the Reformed/ Calvinist persuasion. For instance, in citing Acts 3:16, Steven Lawson writes:

Peter declared that faith in Christ is faith that comes through Him. This means that saving faith is a gift of God. It is the divinely bestowed ability to trust Christ for salvation. God must grant this grace or no sinner will believe. This is because true faith that lays hold of Christ cannot originate from a spiritually dead sinner. A living faith cannot arise out of a dead soul. Out of nothing, nothing comes. So saving faith must be given to the elect sinner as the supernatural gift of the risen Christ (emphasis added).

This understanding sees those who are spiritually dead as remaining so without any hope of being redeemed unless God decides to give them the gift of “faith.” This view ignites some concerning implications.

Holding to the notion that one does not have the ability to believe paints God into a corner, making Him the one who has failed in saving everyone, since only He has the power to regenerate sinners and give them the “gift” of faith (according to this line of thinking). If this were true, it should relieve the unregenerate from any responsibility before God to believe in Jesus Christ. The unregenerate would be judged to the Lake of Fire based on God’s refusal to “choose them,” a decision reflecting gross injustice and thus showing YHWH to be both cruel and untrustworthy. This does great harm to the character and integrity of God. Bing writes, “If faith is the gift of God’s saving power, the demand for people to ‘believe’ seems misplaced.” If we simply let the context speak for itself, we see that the saints are “made alive with Christ” (2:5) “by grace… through faith” (2:8), which as a whole, is the grace of God. Because of His great grace and abundant mercy (Titus 3:5-7), and the resounding motivation of His love (John 3:16; Rom 5:8), He has made salvation possible through the giving of a perfect sacrifice for the sins of the world (1 John 2:2). The coming of the Lord Jesus Christ and the giving of His life to save the unworthy is the ultimate manifestation of the grace of God.

While this is theologically true and wholly defensible from the Scriptures, it is also seen to be grammatically undeniable. The use of the word “that” in “and that not of yourselves,” has been used to conclude as referring to God giving the dead individual faith as a gift. However, the grammatical construction of this verse quickly puts this assumption to rest. “And that…” is the demonstrative pronoun in the NASB95, while some translations opt for “and this…” Regarding the grammatical structure and how these words should be understood in English, Greek scholar A.T. Robertson writes:

And that (και τουτο [kai touto]). Neuter, not feminine ταυτη [tautē], and so refers not to πιστις [pistis] (feminine) or to χαρις [charis] (feminine also), but to the act of being saved by grace conditioned on faith on our part. Paul shows that salvation does not have its source (ἐξ ὑμων [ex humōn], out of you) in men, but from God. Besides, it is God’s gift (δωρον [dōron]) and not the result of our work.”

The importance of this grammatical fact cannot be overstated; especially in regards to the assumed and faulty notion that God gives faith as a gift only to those whom He wishes to redeem. Beal and Radmacher write, “A rule of Greek grammar is that a demonstrative pronoun should agree with the gender of its antecedent.” The fact that the demonstrative pronoun “that” is in the neuter gender shows that it does not refer back to the antecedent “grace” (being in the feminine gender), nor to the antecedent “faith” (also being in the feminine gender). Therefore, “that” is not synonymous with either “grace” or “faith” but is found to be referring back to the concept that “salvation by grace through faith” has even been made a possibility. Salvation being by grace through faith is the gift.

Another Greek scholar, Daniel Wallace, explains that “touto refers to the concept of a grace-by-faith salvation. As we have seen, touto regularly takes a conceptual antecedent. Whether faith is seen as a gift here or anywhere else in the NT is not addressed by this.” The idea that “faith” is the “gift of God” finds no grammatical support. Steve Lewis writes, “If saving faith is a gift imparted by God, then what must an unsaved person do to get this gift? The important question regarding salvation then becomes, ‘What must I do to believe?’ rather that the biblical question, ‘What must I do to be saved?’ (Acts 16:30).”

Ephesians 2:8 is plain that the “gift of God” is the provision of salvation, and the condition for this provision of salvation is faith alone. Anything else added to Christ as the object of faith desecrates the saving power of the Gospel message and anything required other than simple faith in Him elevates the promises, commitments, and creeds of man to a “Savior-like” level, when it does not save at all. The fact that Paul states that it is “not your own doing” makes it clear that we bring nothing to this gift; we are simply receiving as a fact the work that has already been done for us. The word “gift” in 2:8 is dōron and is used in such passages as Matthew 2:11 when speaking of the “gifts” that were brought to Jesus after His birth. A gift is something freely offered that must be received in order to be enjoyed, and cannot hold an expectation of “payback” in order to be valid. To try and pay one back for a gift that has been extended to you is to turn the gift into a transaction. This cheapens the gift and discredits the Giver.

Ephesians 2:9

Ephesians 2:9 continues the Apostle’s thought, transitioning from the positive notion that salvation is by grace through faith and its emphasis on being a gift from God to the negative that it is not a result of works. But bragging and boasting can only be done in alignment with where the credit is due. If one is presented with works that must be done in addition to the work of Jesus Christ, two things occur:

1. Boasting and bragging with inevitably take place, just as it did when I asked a lady how she knew that she was going to Heaven when she died. Her response was that she had been teaching Sunday School for twelve years. Her response was about her works. When I pressed a little further, the Lord Jesus Christ seemed to be an afterthought to the questions that I was asking her. Such answers zero in on self, are self-validating, and are also self-deception.

2. The person is not truly saved. If anything has been added to the work of Christ in order to assure one that they are saved, they are not because the focus is not on Christ alone. Merida writes, “Many adhere, sometimes without even realizing it, to a Jesus-plus-something-else gospel: Jesus plus baptism, Jesus plus church attendance, Jesus plus quiet times. But if we add anything to the gospel, we lose the gospel. Gospel math works like this: Jesus plus nothing equals everything. The work of Jesus Christ is totally sufficient.” If it is not Jesus alone as the focal point of our faith, then our focal point is deficient since we believed that we must add something else to Him in order for salvation to occur. Regardless if it is well-meaning or ignorantly embraced, if it is not Christ alone, that person is not saved.

By holding fast to the gospel message of salvation by grace alone through faith alone in Jesus Christ alone, and maintaining that “alone” should be strictly defined as “by itself,” we will assure the purity and effectual nature of the gospel, garnering the blessing of God when we share it, and ensuring that those who respond with a conviction that these things are true are truly saved having placed their trust for eternal life and the forgiveness of sins in the Person and Work of the Son of God.

Notice the chiastic structure of Ephesians 2:8-9. Paul’s emphasis is on the “gift of God.”

A- For by grace you have been saved through faith;

B- and that not of yourselves;

C- it is the gift of God; <------- The emphasis in the chiastic structure.

B’- not as a result of works,

A’- so that no one may boast.

The elimination of human works removes any grounds for boasting. For a gift to be truly free, it must be unstained by hands that wish to settle the score. Human beings are born into this world with a bent toward pride and a craving for recognition and credit. Bragging is encouraged in our society and many have embraced “the credit due” as if it were their own. This is exactly the reason why we have so much confusion over the gospel message and why the well-meaning demands that spring from some ministries like a call for commitment, surrender, submission, and forsaking everything has overshadowed the grace of God with the expected performances of man.

Richard Seymour offers up an excellent summary:

God is not looking for man’s righteousness; it is His own righteousness that man can receive only by faith. Changing or improving one’s life does not make a person one step closer to God, nor does it qualify him one bit more for salvation. If it did, then he would have something about which to brag. However, Ephesians 2:8-9 states, “For by grace you have been saved through faith and that not of yourselves; it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone should boast” (emphasis added).

Since salvation is by grace, then a person can do nothing to deserve it, including turning from sin or changing his life. In salvation, faith and works are diametrically opposed to one another. “But that no one is justified by the law in the sight of God is evident, for, ‘the just shall live by faith.’ Yet the law is not of faith, but ‘the man who does them shall live by them’” (Gal 3:11-12).

Changing one’s behavior for the better cannot and will not cause God to be any more gracious toward a person than He already is. Since salvation is a gift of God, it is incorrect to think that by some change in one’s conduct a person can move God or bribe Him to consider him a candidate for salvation. Salvation results in the fact that no one will be able to brag or boast. All man’s efforts and all his attempts to get God’s attention or to coerce God to save him are fruitless, unnecessary, and damning. Because salvation cannot be obtained by any human effort, repentance in regard to salvation cannot mean reformation.

And yet the call for the unregenerate to reform in some way is precisely what we see. For example, the Lutherans and the Catholics with their necessity of baptism (amongst other things) in order to validate one’s salvation is actually found to be preventing that one from being saved. This is known as a “front-loading” of the gospel message, loading it down with weights and requirements that must be met in order for God’s acceptance to take place. If this were to take place, would there not be some grounds for boasting?

In similar fashion, Reformed proponents have called for complete submission and surrender of one’s life at the moment of salvation due to the “loose living” that was observed by many Christians after they had believed in the gospel. But “loose living” is a discipleship issue, not a salvation issue. Living in a way that is not pleasing to the Lord is either due to their personal ignorance, of which the church needs to be making disciples with the understanding that born-again believers are but infants in the spiritual realm, or it is a willful ignorance of refusing to apply the knowledge and instruction that has come from the mature believers around them, of which they will suffer loss of reward at the Judgment Seat of Christ (1 Cor 3:15), though they do not lose their position in Heaven.

Of equal concern is what is known as “back-loading” the gospel message, which permits one to receive eternal life through faith in Christ, but then the demands of a dynamic moral life are immediately thrust upon them as a litmus test for authenticity. Those of certain Pentecostal or Charismatic persuasions have stipulated the need for one to experience the “second blessing,” or to speak in tongues in order to demonstrate their salvation. Again, the performance of man is called to center stage while the redemption of Christ is held waiting in the wings. Again, if the back-loading requirement were attempted or met, would there not be some grounds for boasting, with the person having “done their part?”

With both of these grave errors, the Scriptures scream “No!” Salvation is through faith ALONE in Christ ALONE (John 14:6) without any additional criteria required. Each of the above errors finds the pendulum of salvation swinging too far in each direction. There are not requirements but simply believing in Jesus Christ, which gives no grounds for boasting but in the Lord and His perfect work on the cross. The “credit” in salvation goes to God alone. This should not be surprising, seeing that the chief end of all created history is a doxological one. God will receive all of the glory and salvation is one avenue in the enormous expanse of history that will lead to this wonderful end.

Let us abandon all avenues of boasting but one.

Thus says the Lord, “Let not a wise man boast of his wisdom, and let not the mighty man boast of his might, let not a rich man boast of his riches; but let him who boasts boast of this, that he understands and knows Me, that I am the Lord who exercises lovingkindness, justice and righteousness on earth; for I delight in these things,” declares the Lord.

-Jeremiah 9:23-24

God's Power Toward Believers, Ephesians 2:1-7

*It would be most helpful in this study to read Eph. 1:15-2:7 a few times through in order to see the connection that Paul is making in this passage of Scripture.

Ephesians 2:1-3

Beginning with Ephesians 2, we find Paul giving a descriptive account of the former life of every believer. We must keep in mind that Paul is addressing the Church as a whole, which makes it readily applicable to believers today, and that he would have written this letter without chapter breaks. When we find a chapter break in the Bible, our minds will often “break” the thought and automatically begin a new thought. We should not make that mistake here. William MacDonald agrees.

The chapter break should not obscure the vital connection between the latter part of chapter 1 and the verses that follow. There we watched the mighty power of God as it raised Christ from the grave and crowned Him with glory and honor. Now we see how that same power has worked in our own lives, raising us from spiritual death and seating us in Christ in the heavenlies.”

This shows us that while it is very important to examine the details of Scripture as we maneuver through each and every verse, we cannot afford to lose sight of the larger context. It is with the larger context that we see the connections that the original author was trying to make in communicating Truth to us.

Looking to Ephesians 2:1-3, Paul explains the former position and condition of every believer. Positionally, we were “dead,” being spiritually separated from our Creator. Our condition was formerly in accord with the systematic schemes of Satan. Some may reject this assessment or even scoff at the notion that an unregenerate person had any association with Satan. Afterall, they were not part of the church of Satan, nor did they have a pentagram posted in their front yard. How could they be linked to such a despicable character? “Satan is the leader of the evil spiritual power operating today, namely the spirit which energizes all sinful men.” Sin stands as the chief identifier, the marked quality, and the very essence of Lucifer as the “god of this world (who) has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ” (2 Cor 4:4b). It is precisely the rejection of Paul’s factual assessment that demonstrates the devil’s work. The unbelieving have been deceived and are blinded by the father of lies as to the seriousness of their estate.

“He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies” (John 8:44b).

One does not have to be a card-carrying member of the church of Satan in order to be affiliated with him and assimilated into his schemes. One simply needs to be lacking in God’s life and allow for their fleshly whims to dictate their desires and choices. As seen previously, all are born in depravity, unable to conjure any good that would catch the eye of God. This should not be offensive, but a life-shattering fact that creates a desperate need.

In his desire for us to understand “the surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe” (Eph 1:19b), Paul paints a picture that demonstrates the need for this great exercise of power, showing all men to be exceedingly sinful. Sin is so heinous and damaging that the power of God is the only force in existence that can successfully come against its consequences and effects mankind’s destiny.

Paul begins v. 1 with the phrase “And you,” which should not be seen as another attempt at segregating the audience of this letter into Jews and Gentiles. Again, with the unifying nature of the book (Eph 2:11-22; 3:6), this becomes a difficult case to argue for, especially since it is not explicitly stated in the text. The “you” of 2:1 is reminiscent of the “you” that we observed in 1:13, which was used to make an emphasis concerning a significant event that had happened to the believing recipients of this letter. We should not think that Paul is segregating himself from his readers as if he had not previously been “dead in trespasses and sins” himself, but that his use of “you” emphasizes their previous destitution and how the power of God has brought them to a privileged position that was now an “already blessing” that they were enjoying, just as the sealing of the Holy Spirit was something that had already happened to them as emphasized in 1:13.

Being “dead in trespasses and sins,” speaks to our previous standing of separation from the God of the universe. While this was not God’s intention when man was created (Gen 1-2), it is the abnormal reality of mankind since the events of Genesis 3:1-7. “The spiritual faculties we need are not operative when we are born.” When Paul speaks of trespasses, he is speaking of “making a false step so as to lose footing” like someone stumbling off of the path. These are choices that one makes unwittingly, while “sins” speaks to “missing the mark” or “to act contrary to the will and law of God.” Sin is the result of operating according to what you believe is true and not according to what God has said is true. Wood understands these words in this manner: “’Transgressions’ (paraptōmata) are lapses, while ‘sins’ (hamartiai) are shortcomings.”

Sin is dangerous and has far-reaching implications. Sin has separated us from the Creator God. This was not the original design (Gen 1-2) and broken fellowship was not the intended situation. Sin is a powerful force that has thoroughly tarnished the creation, causing the entire human race to suffer in indescribable ways. We all testify to this fact when we grieve at a funeral. We express such disheartening emotions because something within each of us testifies that death is an abnormality, an intruder that scars the lives of those it touches. It was not the original design of God. Clough writes that, “both man's body and his spirit were systematically damaged in the fall. None of Adam's progeny have been normal, physically or spiritually, save One. Sin damaged every area of man's original design.” This is why treating sin lightly demonstrates a severe misunderstanding of the ravaging effects and distorted reality that sin perpetuates.

With v.2, Paul explains the idea of transgressions and sins as a way “in which you once walked, following the course of this world.” The word “walked” speaks of spiritual matters, meaning “to conduct one’s life, comport oneself, behave, live as habit of conduct.” Our pattern of living before coming to faith in Jesus Christ was one of habitual and careless rebellion against God, which is exactly the pattern in which this world has been trained to go (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). Lenski expounds upon this when he writes:

To walk “in accord with the eon of this world” is to live in a way that harmonizes with the whole age in its present corrupt and debased order which is due to the fallen state of mankind and thus contrary to the kingdom of heaven which shall last forever.

The word “course” here is translated as “eon” in the ABP (and above by Lenski) with a derivative of the word found in 2:7 speaking about the “ages to come.” This word is aiōna, is found 29 times in Paul’s writings, and is understood as “a long period of time, without reference to beginning or end,” “a segment of time as a particular unit of history,” and “the world as a spatial concept.” Hoehner writes, “in the New Testament this noun aiōn normally has reference to time, either a specifically limited period of time, as in 1:21 and 3:9, or an unlimited time, as in 3:21.” Context will always determine meaning regardless of the word under consideration, but it may be helpful to consider the occurrences of aiōn as being “age-lasting.” Our former way of life in living out our sin is “normal” in this present age, being an age that will last only until the Second Coming of Christ when the future age will be ushered in (Eph 1:10). The picture of our formerly being in lock-step, both in rank and file with the mangled distortion that the world is, without any notion or defining quality that would cause someone to think that we didn’t belong to the system that Satan has orchestrated (the “world”- kosmos). Our previous station was one that was truly lost; a carefully crafted, satanic order that we blended into perfectly.

This present age, due to the Fall, is managed and ruled over by Satan, who is described as “the prince of the power of the air, of the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience.” The forfeiture of the right to have dominion by Adam and Eve (Gen 1:26-28) was brought on by the Fall (Gen 3:1-7) and in forfeiting this right, the declared enemy of God and man now presently rules (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11). Obviously, this ascension of Satan as the “god of this world” (2 Cor 4:4) is not due to faithfulness in ruling, but the failure of the appointed heirs in being faithful. The phrase “prince of the power of the air” is unusual in Scripture. Dickason writes:

This title might be rendered “the ruler of the empire of this atmosphere.” It pictures Satan’s position and activity as a dominating leader operating a kingdom that centers in the atmosphere of the earth. It is a limited empire, but it includes all fallen men and angels. It is closely associated in Ephesians 2:2 with the cosmos and is probably another description of the same entity.

In the elaborative phrase “the spirit that is now working in the sons of disobedience,” Beal and Radmacher note that, “The word ‘spirit’ is best understood as an influence rather than a reference to the person of Satan.” This would be a similar understanding to the use of “spirit” as addressed previously in Ephesians 1:17, except with an (obviously) negative connotation. Satan’s ways are the essence, characteristic, and quality of disobedience and defilement. Daily struggles are experienced by all people, being the result of either the world, the flesh, or the devil. But Paul’s description here emphasizes a purposeful, rebellious attitude without regard to God’s will. Peter writes, “Your adversary, the devil, prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour” (1 Pet 5:8). While Peter is addressing believers, we must note that this verse doesn’t specify that Satan is looking for only believers to devour. His desire is for any and all who will fall into line with his self-centered system. One of our greatest obstacles in this corrupt age is convincing the unbeliever that he has been bit!

Many believe our “everyday occurrences” to be normal, when in reality they are situations conducted by the enemy of God to hinder the work of believers and to distract the minds of the world at large, blinding them from the things that really matter in life. We see this when Paul writes, “If our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing. In their case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2 Cor. 4:3-4, emphasis added). It is not that mankind is so dead in their sins that they are incapable of believing, but that the enemy is actively at work to blind the world from seeing the gospel of God’s grace. Unknowingly, we may have formerly been used in hindering the purposes of God, having been blinded to the truth. Being deceived and duped is a most desperate state.

A phrase like “the sons of disobedience” will immediately grab your attention, especially since it occurs again in Ephesians 5:6, which says “Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.” It is clear from this context and the present context in 2:2 that Paul is speaking of those who are in an unregenerate state. Those are indeed the ones who presently are and will be the recipients of God’s wrath (Rom 1:18-32). Hoehner notes that:

Disobedience comes from unbelief, for the person is not persuaded or convinced to trust what has been stated. The genitive is one of quality that could be labeled as an attributive genitive, “disobedient sons,” or simply a descriptive genitive, “sons of disobedience.” So, the unregenerate are characterized as disobedient because they do not believe in what God has provided. It shows that unbelief is more than the absence of trust—it is a defiance against God.

Formerly, every believer was a “son of disobedience.” It is not just the wiles of the devil that blinded us, distracted us, and derailed us, but it is our willing appeasement of our flesh and our willful indulgence in sin that makes the statement that we are anti-God, whether we fully realized such a proclamation or not. Being “sons,” in the Scriptures always has a connection with consideration with the father of that son. For instance, in John 10:26-29 Jesus speaks of His ability to keep His sheep and that His Father is also holding His sheep in His hands. He then states, “I and the Father are one” (John 10:30). This ignites a murderous spirit among the Jews who witnessed this, with them picking up stones to kill Him (John 10:31). They understood the connection that Jesus was emphasizing between son and father, understanding that one was part and parcel of the other.

In this present statement by Paul, the “sons of disobedience” are uncompromisingly linked to their father, Satan. All that is characteristic of them is characteristic of him. Jesus tells the Jews:

You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies (John 8:44).

How can it be denied that our culture is systematically degrading since “the whole world lies in the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:19b)? From lying to murder, the governing forces, both human and otherwise, preach the mark of Satan’s ruling tenure since the garden. This is because the unregenerate men and women of the earth are his sons and daughters, both knowing and unknowingly. They do as their father does.

Moving into v. 3, Paul includes himself as once being someone who lived in this depraved station as well. The word “lived” in the NASB95 is translated as “behaved” in the ABP. The word can mean “to conduct oneself in terms of certain principles,” which corresponds perfectly with Paul’s overarching point in speaking of the “course of this world” (2:2b). These things are an outworking of the flesh and the passions that arouse it. “All human beings sin and are guilty in the sight of God on account of an inherently sinful disposition, which can be traced back to Adam. Acts of sin thus arise from a sinful human heart.” When we speak of the “passions” of which our sin emanates out from, we are speaking of the sickness of the heart; meaning the moral and intellectual central seat of our being. In discussing the unregenerate heart in light of the Biblical evidence, Ryrie notes:

The heart of the unsaved man is characterized in rather severe terms. This means that the intellectual, emotional, volitional, and spiritual aspects of his life are all affected in these ways. His heart is called hard and impenitent (Rom 2:5). The word hard means calloused or insensitive to spiritual things. It is also impenitent or unrepentant which would naturally follow from being insensitive. It is blinded (Eph 4:18), it is evil (Jer 3:17), and it is uncircumcised (Acts 7:51). It can be deceived (James 1:26), and it can deceive (Jer 17:9). It can also sink to the perverted state of being without natural affection (Rom 1:31).

It is frightening to think about the lengths and depths to which sin has ravaged the human heart. Every act of the unregenerate person is separated from God. Every act is dead regardless of the intentions behind them. Every human act originates within the heart whose origin is founded in the fact that body, soul, and spirit are descended from a family tree that finds its roots in Adam and his sin being encouraged and provoked by the devil. Badger remarks that:

We are as guilty as Adam. All of humanity is simply an “Adam-in-extension.” Since we have a direct relationship with Adam (having been spiritually and physically in him while in the garden, transgressing against God, receiving the guilty verdict, and receiving the death penalty), his sin is ours and his guilt is justly and directly (or immediately) placed to our account at the time of our personal individualization at conception.

This state is “carried out” by the desires of our bodies and minds. The body is the instrument by which depravity is manifested. The mind does not speak of the brain, but of the pattern of our thinking processes and the exposure of what we believe to be real or not, which leads to an eventual action in any given situation. We must remember what sin is: sin is operating according to what you believe is true and not according to what God has said is true. We operate our bodies according to what we believe. Thus, the actions of the body are the outflow of the thought processes in the mind (heart). The unregenerate man always thinks and acts apart from God’s truth.

Paul finishes v.3 in stating that every believer, at one time, was “by nature children of wrath, like the rest of mankind.” It’s no secret that all of humanity starts out in the same boat. Some go down with the ship and some believe on the Lord Jesus Christ so that they will be saved (Acts 16:31). The word “nature” here means “the natural character of an entity.” This is the “go to,” default behavior that we are disposed to as a result of our depravity. We see this even in a child’s early stages. You can find instances as early as one year old where the child is already seeking to divide mother and father by refusing to submit to the word “no” and searching for the parent or authority figure that will say “yes.” When corrected, the child resorts to tantrums, fighting against the objective authority that is in their lives. This is where every single person starts out, and this is where every single person stays unless they believe in the Lord Jesus Christ when He is preached to them (Rom 10:17; Eph 1:13; Jas 1:18; 1 Pet 1:22-23).

As dark as our former state was, it is not without hope. The depravity of mankind has been given a solution. God is intimately involved, already working, and desires for all men to be saved (1 Tim 2:4). He is our Provider and our Hope!

Ephesians 2:4-7

“But God” must be the most beautiful phrase in all of Scripture. Paul’s use provides a wonderful segue from an existence of never-ending darkness into a realm of light and life, such as only can be divinely provided for us! “But God” absolves the separation and brings the Christian into a reconciled relationship with his Creator (2 Cor 5:17-18). This is a 180 degree shift that is undeserving by One who is “rich in mercy.” Chafer expounds upon this glorious “about-face” when he writes:

With full recognition of the depths to which man has fallen, it is nevertheless declared that there is abundant salvation for all who believe: a salvation which so far exceeds the ruin that it not only reverses all that man lost by the fall, but it lifts him up far above his original unfallen state to the highest conceivable position in heaven, there to share forever the fellowship and the glory of the Triune God.

Ephesians 2:4 begins by explaining that God is rich in mercy. This is not just in the present, but it has always been of God from eternity past. Mercy is perfected in God and He is perfectly merciful, being an attribute that signifies His absence of rigidity and malevolence. He is not spiteful, vindictive, or hostile. He is benevolent, charitable, and exuding pity and generosity over His creation.

If God had not been a merciful God, He had not been the God who saves. Hidden away in the word “mercy” is the word “compassion.” It was the compassion of God, which quickened His mercy and made it potent. Mercy means far more than forgiveness. Mercy suggests that God, in His omniscience and His omnipotence, sought out and found out a way whereby He could be just, and yet the justifier of him who believes.

When we think of the mercy of the court, we think of a judge passing over the guilt of the condemned. When we think of the mercy of God we think of Christ bearing the guilt, sustaining the law in all of its majesty, and yet, saving the guilty. God saves the guilty not because He is sorry, but because He has found a substitute, Christ; because, upon that Substitute is placed the punishment due the sinner, that in mercy He might redeem the sinner.

This verse speaks to us of God’s motivation in providing deliverance for the believer in Christ. It is the motivation of love; but not just any love, this is “great love,” His selflessly-distributed affection” (agape) which moves Him to provide a sacrifice for sin. God exposes His mercy by demonstrating it through the selfless love that He shows for people. In fact, God loves the whole world (John 3:16). What is even more is that the love of God is demonstrated in the fact that God gave His best to have a relationship with sinners (Rom. 5:8). We see an example of this in His pleading with Israel, that they would listen to His voice and follow His counsel and live (Ezekiel 18), as well as in the weeping of Jesus Christ when He says,

“Jerusalem, Jerusalem, who kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to her! How often I wanted to gather your children together, the way a hen gathers her chicks under her wings, and you were unwilling. Behold, your house is being left to you desolate! For I say to you, from now on you will not see Me until you say, ‘Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!’” (Matt 23:37-39).

The extensive love of God is clearly manifested in the expression of frustration and sadness that God feels when people do not heed His voice (John 3:9-10). We also see a glimpse of this regarding believers in Hebrews 12:6, stating, “For those whom the Lord loves He disciplines, and He scourges every son whom He receives.” While one initially fails to see the love in something like chastening, it is the fact that chastening is even occurring that demonstrates the love in question.

Moving to Ephesians 2:5, Paul again touches upon his statement in 2:1 for the purpose of showing the great measure of mercy that God has shown us. Even while we were all dead (and at one time we were all dead), God made us alive! Our spiritually dead state is rectified by God’s doing. It is God alone who gives life! This concept is captured succinctly in Colossians 2:13-14, where Paul writes:

And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross.

We have been made alive because God has taken care of the sin problem by placing it upon His Son. All debt that we have incurred or inherited (from Adam) and every demand that the Law places upon us has been met, extinguished, and relieved by God’s provision in Christ (Rom 10:4). It has been nailed to the cross. This has given way to greater grace in our resurrection and ascendancy with Him (Eph 2:6). Westcott exclaims, “He quickened the dead with life: He restored them to the full use of the powers of their former life: He raised them, without the loss of the perfection of their humanity, to a life in the heavenly order.”

As a quick side note, there are some theologians who understand this matter of God making “us alive together with Christ” as support for the erroneous notion that God arbitrarily causes only select people to be born again, and then he proceeds to give them the “gift of faith.” R.C. Sproul writes:

Here is a theological formula that may strike you as strange: “Regeneration precedes faith.” We have seen that regeneration, or spiritual rebirth, is the beginning of the Christian life. If regeneration is the first step, obviously it must come before the second step. Spiritually dead people do not suddenly develop faith, causing God to regenerate them. Rather, faith is the fruit of the regeneration God performs in our hearts: “Even when we were dead in our trespasses, [God] made us alive together with Christ” (Eph 2:4b). We are born again (regenerated), then we come to faith, then we are justified, and then we begin to undergo the lifelong sanctification process (Rom. 8:30). All these events comprise the whole complex of the Christian life.

We can agree with Sproul’s opening line that his “theological formula” is certainly strange, because it is without support. This is a contrived understanding that seeks to derive a theology from this one verse and fails to see the context as a whole. Sproul’s notion that one is born again before he or she believes is unfounded in Scripture, but is a necessary conclusion because of the philosophical viewpoint that he holds on the nature of one being “dead’ spiritually. Countering this, Rene Lopez writes:

Nowhere does Scripture teach the inability of individuals to respond to God’s drawing. In fact one finds just the opposite. For example Jesus said, “If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink” (John 7:37). And “the Spirit and the bride say ‘Come’” (Rev. 22:17). Otherwise how could God blame people for not acknowledging Him or believing in Christ (John 5:40)?

Let us keep in mind that Paul is not talking about individuals, but the Church as a whole, including himself by using the pronoun “us” (PIP) and the word “together.” Being “made alive” is found to be “together with Christ,” which clearly reflects the “immeasurable power of God” which Paul prayed about in 1:19. The elaboration that follows this concept states “by grace you have been saved,” being later expounded upon in 2:8-9. In considering the context of this passage (moving forward to 2:10), it is clear that one is made alive by God at the moment that they believe in Christ, and not before.

In better understanding “by grace you have been saved,” Ed DeZago writes:

Paul breaks off in a parenthetical outburst. This idea of grace has, thus far, appeared throughout this letter and this phrase will be repeated again in verse eight. Concerning the nature of grace, Romans 11:6 provides insight, “But if it is by grace, it is no longer on the basis of works; otherwise grace would no longer be grace.” Grace is God’s favor apart from any meritorious efforts by the recipient. The last phrase is a perfect passive participle. The perfect tense stresses the present reality based upon a completed past event. The passive voice indicates that those saved did not do the action but were acted upon. Thus, the believer is presently saved by a completed act of God in and through Christ and the believer did not do anything to save himself but, rather, was conferred grace by God (see 2:8-9). We receive grace. We do not merit grace.

No serious student of the Scriptures would argue that God is not the One who makes those who are spiritually dead in trespasses and sins alive in Christ. But we would find serious discrepancies about the various viewpoints as to how He goes about it. The way that people are saved is “through faith.” It is only by God’s grace that salvation comes to mankind. Faith is the channel by which salvation is applied to the one believing; it is the response that one gives upon hearing the Word of God (Rom 10:17; Eph 1:13; Jas 1:18; 1 Pet 1:22-23). There is nothing meritorious about responding to God. God has done all of the work in conquering sins and death through Jesus Christ (Rom 8:2). All of the work necessary in salvation is accomplished in Christ. Faith is simply being convinced that this is true! It is a response to hearing the good news, a response that every single person can exercise if they hear the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

By being made alive “together with Christ,” we have also received a privileged position in being seated in the heavenlies in Christ Jesus. God has raised us, not just from the spiritual dead, but He has raised us up to a position of privilege, one that is certainly characterized by grace, and is definitely undeserved favor (grace) from God our Father. Being raised up “with Him” emphasizes the importance of resurrection. When God makes us alive with Christ, He resurrects us from the spiritual dead, and just as Christ has ascended to the right hand of the throne of God (Eph 1:20; Acts 7:55; Heb 12:2), we too are seated in the heavenly realm because we are in Christ Jesus. Our glorious location “in Christ” is not just a place of present redemption, but is a living location of celestial allotment in having a “seat” (“sat down together” -Luke 22:55) Alongside our living Lord. In looking back to the previous chapter, but still in the immediate context, this demonstrates another exercise of the “surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe” (1:19) which is seen clearly in Christ as the prototype. Hoehner understands this location as “the place of heavenly realms.” He goes on to note:

From this position the believer derives every spiritual benefit. Hence, the position of being seated with Christ in the heavenlies gives the believer a heavenly status with heavenly power to overcome the power of sin and death. The believers are not only in the heavenlies but also in Christ Jesus. This last prepositional phrase is not connected to the previous prepositional phrase “in the heavenly realms” but is joined to the verb “to be seated together with him.” This is not redundant, for it underscores the reason we are seated in the heavenlies with Christ, namely, because we are in him. It is our union with Christ that gives us the right to be in the heavenly places.

Clearly it is grace upon grace, and blessing upon “already blessing” for the believer in Christ! This is truly a demonstration of His great power “toward us who believe” (1:19), culminating in an exceedingly great purpose!

With Ephesian 2:7, we find that God has done this immeasurably great life-giving, resurrection, and ascension work (1:19; 2:5-6), by His grace (2:5), according to His great mercy (2:4), being motivated by His great (agape) love (2:4), for the purpose of demonstrating His immeasurable grace in the coming ages. Here we see the use of the word aiōn, which is speaking of eternity future. This was previously translated as “course” in 2:2b, but unlike the reference being to the present orchestrated system of Satan, 2:7 is obviously pointing to a future age, being that of the Millennial Kingdom, a subject that has already been addressed in 1:10. In understanding the words “might show” we get a better glimpse into the text. McCalley writes:

The verb might show (deiknumi) is always found in the middle voice in the New Testament. It therefore means to show for oneself, that is, for one’s own glory. Believers saved by grace are God’s publicity program of the ages. Ephesians 1:19 spoke of God’s surpassing power, and now the same is said of His grace. The superabundance of grace corresponds to the superabundance of power. God is as gracious as He is powerful. If the raising of Christ from the dead and placing Him at the Father’s right hand is the supreme demonstration of power, then the raising of those once dead in sins and seating them in heaven is the supreme demonstration of God’s grace.

Chafer notes that, “It is disclosed that the supreme purpose of God in salvation is that His grace in all its ‘exceeding riches’ might have an adequate manifestation.” The chief end of all of history is that God would be glorified. Everything in existence will one day point to a glorifying end in showing God as being Supreme over all things and being exalted as the great Master and Creator of the universe. While many would assume that the end goal of history is a redemptive one, the Bible points to the glory of God as taking precedence over the salvation of sinners. Christopher Cone writes, “The redemptive achieves the doxological. The redemptive is a means to an end- the doxological end.” Having been redeemed or not, glory will be had by God on the last day. The “surpassing riches of His grace” in the Church will be on full display throughout the eternal halls of history for visible and invisible to behold.

This grace that demonstrates His infinite glory is noted by Paul as being manifested in His “kindness” toward us in Christ. “Kindness” is the word chrēstotēs, meaning “the quality of being helpful or beneficial, goodness, kindness, generosity.” It is simply God’s nature to be kind and helpful to those who were dead in sins, so as to bring them to a point where they give Him glory for ages upon ages. Magnificent is the expansive grace of God!

Now, why does God do this with sinful creatures? Because God is demonstrating His use of helpless, lesser creatures that can accomplish His divine goal of ultimate glory over a once highly exalted angel who sought such glory for himself (Eph 2:2). Let us quickly review the pre-chronological occurrence of the first sin:

You were blameless in your ways from the day you were created

Until unrighteousness was found in you. By the abundance of your trade

You were internally filled with violence, and you sinned (Ezek 28:15-16a).

Satan’s desire was to ascend to the heavens and make himself like the Most High (Isa 14:13-14a). This was the outward expression of the “unrighteousness” that was found within him. Being cast “as profane from the mountain of God” (Ezek 28:16b), his efforts to rule eternity were over, but the realm of God’s creation for mankind would be his next endeavor, and one that he would be successful with… for a time.

Satan now stands mocked by the cross of Christ and beaten by the grace of God in His making justification available to sinners. Colossians 2:15 says, “When He had disarmed the rulers and authorities, He made a public display of them, having triumphed over them through Him.” Every saved person is a reminder of the enemy’s certain condemnation. And every sinner who is made alive by God through faith in Jesus Christ is exalted to a position that is impossible for Lucifer to ever hold again. Believers are exalted to the heavenlies as a display unto the world, visible and invisible, that God’s power reigns, that God’s purposes triumph, and that God alone will be exalted, as demonstrated through the exaltation of His Son, and with Him, all who believe in His Name! Being rich in mercy, His love motivates Him to take lesser creatures and exalt them to greater graces alongside the Lord Jesus Christ!

IT IS THE STRENGTH OF GOD IN THE RESURRECTION AND ASCENSION OF CHRIST (1:19b-23) THAT IS ALSO EXERCISED IN THE REDEMPTION, RESURRECTION, AND ASCENSION OF THE BELIEVER (2:1-10).

May He be praised for His glorious grace (Eph 1:6, 12, 14)!

What Does the Bible Mean By "Dead?" -Ephesians 2:1

With this lesson, we are only going to be looking at one word in Ephesians 2:1, but the controversy that surrounds this one word and the ideologies that have sprung from it have been a dangerous blight on the face of Christianity for hundreds of years that has served to grossly misrepresent God as the Scriptures clearly reveal Him. While I will seek to do some form of justice to presenting the dissenting sides of this viewpoint, the scope of information that advocates for the various dissenting views is overwhelming to say the least! My goal here is to present a biblical case that argues for a biblical view clearly derived from the Scriptures, which in turn will expose the dissenting views for being shown as reading something into the text rather than abandoning their ideology in favor of the text. We must remember that the Holy Scriptures are inerrant and infallible in their original languages (Psalm 19:7-8; 2 Tim 3:16) and we as believers in Christ are called to study the Word of God in order to show ourselves approved before God, being workmen who need not be ashamed (2 Tim 2:15).

Ephesians 2:1

“And you were dead in your trespasses and sins” begins a ten-verse long sentence (2:1-10). Because of the use of “and” (kai) which begins this chapter, we can understand that Paul has not separated his thought process in order to embark on something new, but instead has made this a continuation of his previous subject matter. While having chapter and verse numbers in our modern-day Bibles has proven to be helpful in finding verses, referencing passages, and Scripture memorization, it sometimes presents a disadvantage in causing our minds to add a separation in the text when the original letter simply flowed forward as it was meant to be read. Many translations of the Bible have also added headings that summarize what the English translators believe to be the main point in a particular passage. These can be helpful, but they can also be very misleading.

Of particular interest to us in this lesson is the word “dead,” and what is meant by “being dead in transgressions and sins.” How does this play out theologically? Is a human being completely incapable to respond to the Gospel message when they hear it, or are they simply unable to do anything to merit (earn) their justification before God, yet they can respond in faith to the Gospel when they hear it? This is a major debate within theological circles and the realms of academia, but it also has great implications for the local church in how we understand the nature and character of God, how we view the work of God in salvation, how we interpret other passages of Scripture, and how we evangelize those who are not saved (the unregenerate). We will begin with an examination of the word for “dead” while examining some of its various uses. We must also speak to the various theological perspectives and their implications, demonstrating how “dead” has been understood and promoted within theological systems. We will then offer both biblical and logical replies so that we have consistency in our understanding of the Scriptures.

Examining the Word “Dead”

The word for “dead” in Ephesians 2:1 is the Greek word nekros. Nekros is a noun that often means “dead person, corpse;” and as an adjective, “dead.” The verb nekroō is used in the active sense as “kill,” and “put to death,” and is used passively as simply “die.” In the LXX (Septuagint) the word nekros is used around 60 times and speaks of one who has died, a corpse, as one who is in a state of death (Gen 23:3-15) or as performing an act in commemoration of those who have passed away, as was the pagan custom (Lev 21:5; Deut 14:1). Verbrugge aides our understanding, stating that “Numbers 19 draws a boundary between the sphere of death and that of life. Those who come directly or indirectly in contact with the dead are unclean, i.e., separated from Yahweh.” Examining Numbers 19, one will notice that in verses 13 and 20 that the ones who do not cleanse themselves are considered as “unclean” and are “cut off” from Israel (v. 13) and the assembly (v. 20). To be dead is to be “unclean,” and to handle the dead is to be “unclean.” Those who do not cleanse themselves are “unclean” to the point of separation until they are cleansed. We also see this type of understanding in Ecclessiates 9:3-4, where it is written:

This is an evil in all that is done under the sun, that there is one fate for all men. Furthermore, the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil and insanity is in their hearts throughout their lives. Afterwards they go to the dead. For whoever is joined with all the living, there is hope; surely a live dog is better than a dead lion.

Solomon’s point is that while one is living, they have certain privileges in the realm of the living. When they die, they are now in a different realm. What is interesting to see is that the idea of being dead does not mean a cessation of being, but of separation from the realm of the living. If the word for “dead” meant cessation, we would conclude that there is no afterlife, and therefore no eternal life. This is an important point in understanding the ideas of dead, death, and being unclean.

With the New Testament, the word nekros is found 129 times, “both as an adjective and as a noun.” We also see that the verb nekroō is found three times: in Romans 4:19, where we find that Abraham’s body was not able to reproduce due to his old age; Colossians 3:5, which finds Paul encouraging the believers in Colossae to “put to death” those things that are earthly about them to which he proceeds to give a list of such sinful behavior which warrants the wrath of God on Earth (Col 3:5b-6) ; and Hebrews 11:12, where Abraham’s reproductive state is again addressed as being “as good as dead.”

We know from our previous chapter in Ephesians that God “raised Him from the dead” (Eph 1:20), speaking of Jesus Christ, who was separated from His fleshly body, but did not cease to exist; otherwise the resurrection would not have been possible. We are also told that Jesus is declared to be “the firstborn from the dead” (Col 1:18) which speaks to His privileged position much like the “firstborn” having special rights and a double inheritance in a Jewish family, but it also immediately presupposes that there are more to be “born” from the dead as well (speaking of rapture/resurrection of the saints in Christ). This also holds weight when Paul declares that those believers who had already passed away had “fallen asleep” (1 Thess 4:14, c.f. 4:16), just as Jesus declares “she is not dead, but sleeping” (Luke 8:52- to which we would have to conclude that Jesus did not raise her from the dead if she was literally sleeping). Again, we see that when speaking of being “dead,” the Bible continually reaffirms the idea of separation rather than that of cessation. While the physical body may be lifeless and non-responsive, this does not allow one to take the liberty to automatically conclude that one being spiritually dead is also lifeless and non-responsive. We can, however, understand this to mean that a spiritually dead person is separated from God.

The Scriptures also teach us about the figurative use of “dead.” Looking at Luke 15 and the Prodigal Son, we read the father’s response when he says:

“But the father said to his slaves, ‘Quickly bring out the best robe and put it on him, and put a ring on his hand and sandals on his feet; and bring the fattened calf, kill it, and let us eat and celebrate; for this son of mine was dead and has come to life again; he was lost and has been found.’ And they began to celebrate.”

- Luke 15:22–24, emphasis added.

Notice that the understanding of what it was for the son to be “dead” was his time of separation from the father, not that he was lifeless, could not respond, or had ceased to exist. The idea of the son being “dead” is paralleled with the response of the father as being “lost,” just as being “alive again” is paralleled with being “found.” Of course, we can see the son was back within the realm of his father once more, instead of being separated from Him. One could conclude that the idea of being “lost” is meant as being unregenerate (what we often call “not saved”), but this is reading something into the text that the context simply does not support, especially in understanding that the son was a son before he went into the far country (see also Luke 15:1-10).

We can also understand the use of “dead” figuratively in speaking of “faith by itself, if it does not have works, is dead” in James 2:17. Seeing that this is written to believers (1:2, 16, 19; 2:1, 5, 14; 3:1, 12; 4:11; 5:7, 9, 12, 19), it is incompatible with James to understand a “dead faith” as a “non-saving” or insufficient faith to get one to Heaven. The Scriptures know nothing of this concept. What we do see is that when a believer’s faith is by itself (“separated” from good works) it is unprofitable to those within the Body. Faith by itself is a dead faith that has no benefit for fellow believers and is not “being completed” by his works (2:22). However, when faith is “active along with his works” (2:22), we see that it leads to a “justification by works” among men. It is clear that “dead” in this context means “separated from works.” This is something completely different than “justification by faith” as understood in Romans 3:24ff.

In continuing with our word study, we find that the Greek Lexicon BDAG (which has been used throughout this study) gives two designations as to what this word would be pertaining to in the Scriptures. It is important for us to look at each instance for the sake of clarity, seeking to stay true to the Scriptures.

-Pertaining to being in a state of loss of life” - This can be seen in Acts 5:10, where Sapphira falls down dead and in Acts 20:9 where Eutychus falls out of the window while Paul is preaching and is “picked up dead,” of which he is resurrected (Acts 20:10-12). Both of these instances can be understood in their respective contexts as being physical in nature. We also see this when Jesus speaks of Himself in Revelation 1:18 in stating, “I was dead, and behold, I am alive forevermore, and I have the keys of death and of Hades.” Again, we see the instance of physical death, but especially in Jesus’ case, we understand from the Scriptures that He did not cease to be but that He was separated from His physical body (See 1 Peter 3:18-20).

-Pertaining to being so morally or spiritually deficient as to be in effect dead,” - This can be seen in Revelation 3:1 where the church in Sardis is pronounced as having a reputation for being alive, but they were really dead. The figurative sense is obvious. While the other churches in Rev. 2-3 were all assemblies of believers, it would be wrong to single out this church as being unregenerate, especially seeing that the immediate context is concerning their works and not their faith. The church in Sardis was a church of “incomplete works” (Rev 3:2), yet there were some who had not “soiled their garments” (Rev 3:4). In other words, some in the church had separated from what God had laid before them to accomplish (Rev 3:2), while others had not (Rev 3:4). The use of “dead” shows a separation in not completing the works that had been prepared beforehand for this local Body of believers, that they should walk in them (Eph 2:10).

We also see this idea in Romans 6:11 & 13 where Paul commands believers saying, “Even so consider yourselves to be dead to sin, but alive to God in Christ Jesus.” and “do not go on presenting the members of your body to sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves to God as those alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness to God,” respectively (emphasis added). Paul is speaking to believers about how they must consider (reckon) themselves. Sin is not to be rampant in the believer’s life because believers have died to it (Rom 6:2) and have been raised from the dead that they might walk in “newness of life” (Rom 6:4). Since believers are “in Christ,” they are to consider themselves as “separated” from sin because they have been put into a new location, which is “newness of life” in Christ Jesus. This same idea is seen in 6:13, where the believer has “been brought from death to life” and because of that fact, they are to present their members for righteous purposes. We were separated from the righteous realm, but now, because of all that Christ has accomplished on the cross of Calvary, believers are no longer separated (dead).

It should be clear from what has been examined that the idea of “dead” or “death” can mean that one may be lifeless in a physical sense, but the more proper understanding for both physical and spiritual use in the Scriptures is that of being separated in some capacity. Charles Ryrie clarifies this, writing:

Death does not mean either extinction or cessation; it always means separation. Physical death is the separation of the immaterial part of man from the material body. It does not mean that the person has become extinct or that he has ceased to be or to function. The unbeliever who dies, for instance, is still conscious and active though apart from his physical, earthly body (Luke 16:19–31). Spiritual death is certainly not extinction or inactivity. Every unsaved person walking the face of the earth today is spiritually dead but is at the same time existing and active. However, he is separated from God, and this is what makes him spiritually dead.

Major Theological Persuasions

In Evangelicalism, there are two major branches of theological thought which contain many different hybrids depending on the issue at hand. As regards soteriology (the doctrine of salvation), both Calvinism and Arminianism stand as the major schools of thought to which many belong or readily identify with. While this work does not permit me to go into the beliefs of each branch, there are worthwhile books that provide accurate representations of each view.

This author does not agree with Calvinism or Arminianism, especially in the matter of what it means to be “dead in transgressions and sins,” which will be defended more thoroughly as we progress. However, to properly defend this view, one must have the opposing viewpoints in order to establish a biblical refutation. We will look first at the Calvinist view of “total depravity” followed by the Arminian view.

“Total Depravity” and “Total Inability”

Both Calvinists and Arminians believe in the concept of “total depravity.” However, what each side means by total depravity is something other than what the Bible tell us. In fact, both sides ultimately hold to what is called “total inability.” Before moving forward, we must define the terms “total depravity” and “total inability.” When one speaks of being “totally depraved,” we find a good definition of this understanding by Calvinist theologian J.I. Packer when he writes:

The phrase total depravity is commonly used to make explicit the implications of original sin. It signifies a corruption of our moral and spiritual nature that is total not in degree (for no one is as bad as he or she might be) but in extent. It declares that no part of us is untouched by sin, and therefore no action of ours is as good as it should be, and consequently nothing in us or about us ever appears meritorious in God’s eyes. We cannot earn God’s favor, no matter what we do; unless grace saves us, we are lost.

This is a definition that I believe properly represents the spiritual state of every man due to the genetic inheritance and effects of original sin (Gen 3). Without God’s grace, no one would be saved. All of human existence is spiritually bankrupt in bringing anything to the table that God should ever take notice of, or grant favor to, based upon it. It is an indisputable theological fact that the sin of Adam has separated the whole of mankind from a relationship with Almighty God. In fact, it is this “separation” that we can biblically understand as what it means to be “dead,” spiritually speaking.

The Calvinist View

What is troublesome is that Packer goes on to elaborate further on the extent of what he means concerning “total depravity” in the very next paragraph when he writes:

Total depravity entails total inability, that is, the state of not having it in oneself to respond to God and his Word in a sincere and wholehearted way (John 6:44; Rom. 8:7–8). Paul calls this unresponsiveness of the fallen heart a state of death (Eph. 2:1, 5; Col. 2:13), and the Westminster Confession says: “Man by his fall into a state of sin, hath wholly lost all ability of will to any spiritual good accompanying salvation; so as a natural man, being altogether averse from that good, and dead in sin, is not able by his own strength to convert himself, or to prepare himself thereunto” (IX. 3).

MacArthur agrees with Packer when he writes:

Unregenerate sinners have no life by which they can respond to spiritual stimuli. No amount of love, beseeching, or spiritual truth can summon a response. People apart from God are the ungrateful dead, spiritual zombies, death-walkers, unable even to understand the gravity of their situation. They are lifeless. They may go through the motions of life, but they do not possess it.

Reformed theologian John Frame unfolds the particular issue in Calvinist thinking:

Some might try to use total inability as an excuse, saying “I won’t believe in Jesus, because I cannot.” But Scripture does not warrant that excuse. Total inability is not physical or psychological. We are physically and mentally able to believe in Christ. The inability is moral, an inability to do the right thing. That is an inability for which we are responsible. It cannot be used as an excuse (emphasis added).

To say that one is totally unable to respond to God in any way, and yet are held morally responsible for what they cannot do, creates a great deal of concern when considering the Scriptures and the repeated calls for human beings to respond to God as they receive further revelation about Him. But is this what the Scriptures teach? Is the fallen human race unresponsive and unable to respond to anything spiritual whatsoever?

In the book of Jonah, we do not have a people that come to faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, but we do have a people who respond to God’s threat that He will destroy Ninevah if the people of this wicked city do not repent (Jonah 1:2; 3:4-10). We also see that Cornelius in the book of Acts was a Gentile soldier who was “a devout man and one who feared God with all his household, and gave many alms to the Jewish people and prayed to God continually” (Acts 10:2). Yet we find that he did not become a Christian until Peter was sent to share the Gospel with him (10:34-45). We also see the Bereans in Acts 17:11, which reads, “Now these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness, examining the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.” This may not seem like an odd situation, but Luke’s note that they were Jews tells us that they were not believers in Christ. Despite being unbelievers, they were searching the Scriptures in order to verify Paul’s message, thus responding to the message of God before ever believing in Jesus Christ.

Total inability finds its greatest prominence in Reformed Theology, which is more commonly known as Calvinism. Seeking to demonstrate the rationality of the Calvinists’ case concerning “total inability,” J.I. Packer writes:

Everyone in the Reformed mainstream will insist that Christ the Savior is freely offered- indeed, freely offers himself- to sinners in and through the gospel; and that since God gives us all free agency (that is, voluntary decision-making power) we are indeed answerable to him for what we do, first, about universal general revelation, and then about the law and the gospel when and as these are presented to us; and that only those who persevere in their Christian pilgrimage ever reach the heavenly city. But Calvinism at the same time affirms the total perversity, depravity, and inability of fallen human beings, which results in them naturally and continually using their free agency to say no to God, and the absolute sovereignty of the regenerating God who effectually calls and draws them into newness of life in Christ. Calvinism magnifies the Augustinian principle that God himself graciously gives all that in the gospel he requires and commands, and the reactive rationalism of Arminianism in all its forms denies this to a degree.

In reading this quote, I hope that you see the startling contradictions regarding Christ offering Himself “freely.” How can Christ be offered freely to someone who has no ability nor capacity to receive that which is offered? Would not this offer seem like a cruel joke? Would we not be seen as insensitive, malicious, and twisted if we freely offered a paraplegic a pair of gloves and then beckoned relentlessly that he/she put them on? This is nothing short of detestable. Is it not the same with God as depicted through the views of Calvinism?

The solution that the Calvinist brings to the table is that God “regenerates” a person and then gives them the gift of faith so that they will necessarily exercise it. This is explained by Steele, Thomas, and Quinn:

Because of the fall, man is unable of himself to savingly believe the gospel. The sinner is dead, blind, and deaf to the things of God; his heart is deceitful and desperately corrupt. His will is not free, it is in bondage to his evil nature, therefore, he will not – indeed he cannot – choose good over evil in the spiritual realm. Consequently, it takes much more than the Spirit’s assistance to bring a sinner to Christ – it takes regeneration by which the Spirit makes the sinner alive and gives him a new nature. Faith is not something man contributes to salvation, but is itself a part of God’s gift of salvation – it is God’s gift to the sinner, not the sinner’s gift to God.

To define “regeneration,” we would understand this word to mean “born again” or “born from above” (John 3:3). Essentially, the Calvinist view states that God causes one to be born again so that they can receive His “gift of faith.” Once receiving the “gift of faith,” the born again, unsaved person will then believe, because he or she has no other choice but to believe since God has given them this faith. While the idea of faith being a gift will be dealt with later in examining Ephesians 2:8-9, the concept that one is “born again” before they are a believer in Christ is foreign to Scripture. Surely, from John 3, we can deduce that being born again occurs at the moment of faith (John 3:3, 5, 15-16). However, we do not see one example in Scripture where regeneration has occurred before one believes in Christ. This Calvinist view of regeneration and “faith as a gift” is often referred to as “the grace of God.” To say that faith could be exercised apart from God giving it to you is to bring about an accusation from the Calvinist that faith is a work. However, this is a perspective that is foreign to the Scriptures.

The Arminian View

With the Arminian view, there is a belief in what is called “prevenient grace.” Prevenient grace is defined by Roger Olson as “grace that precedes and enables the first stirrings of a good will toward God.” This view affirms that all are unable to respond as well, but that God has made a provision in showing “prevenient grace,” which has now made it possible for all people everywhere to respond to the Gospel. Thus, every person is a recipient of prevenient grace. While all are unable to respond, prevenient grace has made this universal inability an ability for all people. This view may seem more plausible when compared with the views of Calvinism, but this does not gel with the Scriptural witness.

A greater concern in connection with Arminianism is the implications of one operating in prevenient grace according to their free will, which led to the conclusion that one could lose or forfeit their salvation. Bing explains:

Arminius had not completely settled his views on the loss of salvation before he died. There is some indication that he thought the loss of salvation was final. He taught that the righteousness of Jesus Christ is imputed to the believer as long as that person remains in Christ through faith. He was reluctant to say that sinful acts alone would lose salvation if someone still had faith in Christ. However, he seemed to make works the evidence of faith and conceded that someone living sinfully has no grounds for assurance of salvation.

Works being the “evidence of faith” has also served as works being the validation of faith. One who truly has faith will have the necessary works, so the logic goes. This conclusion has been reached as the necessary outcome of the total depravity/ability belief, for one to have been overcome by God so that they can believe (Arminianism) or being regenerated and then given faith as a gift that will be necessarily exercised (Calvinism) will certainly show God’s work in their actions, deeds, and thoughts. While no one should question whether a believer in Christ will have good works as a result of being born from above, we cannot conclude from the Scriptures that this is the validation of one’s salvation. This turns the gospel of God’s free grace in the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ into a transaction that awaits the recipient’s performance. Failure to perform show that salvation never took place (Calvinism) or that salvation has been lost (Arminianism). The conclusion is the same: no assurance of an eternity with God.

In his work Grace, Faith, Free Will: Contrasting Views of Salvation: Calvinism and Arminianism, scholar Robert Picirilli gives a summation of the Arminian view of “total depravity” and “total inability”:

1. Since the fall of Adam and Eve, all human beings inherit from the original parents a corrupt nature, as inclined toward evil now as Adam and Eve were toward good before the fall.

2. In consequence of this condition, man’s will is no longer naturally free to choose God apart from the supernatural work of the Spirit of God.

3. Therefore, left to himself, no person either can or will accept the offer of salvation in the gospel and put saving faith in Christ.

4. This condition may rightly be called total depravity, in that it pervades every aspect of man’s being, and total inability, in that it leaves him helpless to perform anything truly good in God’s sight (emphasis original).

The similarities between the Calvinist and Arminian views should be striking! How could two differing schools of theology come to such cohesion in their understanding? Admittedly, not all Arminians believe that man is “helpless to perform anything truly good in God’s sight,” but most do, and they would be right.

However, this does not speak to unbeliever’s ability to respond to the gospel of Jesus Christ when they hear the message of salvation. Such a response cannot be considered a work, but rather a firm conviction on whether or not the contents and proposition of the gospel are true. It is the subject of one’s ability to respond when the gospel is shared that solves the constricting tenets of each school of thought.

Summary

Anthony Badger sums up both views when he writes:

Calvinism teaches that man is so totally depraved that he is unable to believe in Christ and that only those God has selected before the foundation of the world are sovereignly regenerated by the Spirit prior to faith, so that the person ultimately believes. So, in that view, regeneration precedes faith, but this removes faith as the instrument by which man might believe. Calvinists mistakenly place the resulting regeneration prior to the condition of faith by which the new birth is received.

Arminianism, on the other hand also asserts that man has no free will, is totally depraved, and can’t believe “of himself.” They then supply the idea that God gives the ability to believe to all men enabling anyone to believe and be saved. They call it prevenient grace or enabling grace. All people have a kind of free will because of this. But if God gives all men the ability to believe when they have no such ability, why go into the discussion as to whether a person can believe or not? It makes no real difference.

The Implications of their Views

Both views find their end in the need for God to enable, a lack of assurance, and a distorted view of grace. For the Calvinist, one is not sure that he or she is a believer until death occurs. If one does not maintain good works (or in Packer’s words, “only those who persevere in their Christian pilgrimage ever reach the heavenly city,”) they cannot be sure of their final destination. If one does not have sufficient works, or does not “endure till the end,” they show themselves to have never been saved.

As for the Arminian, which believes that one can lose their salvation (either by walking away from the faith, “backsliding,” or simply committing a high-handed sin), there is no certainty of an eternity with God. Both beliefs negate the regeneration that occurs when one believes (which brings about the indwelling of the Holy Spirit, who seals the believer for the “day of redemption” –Eph 1:13-14; 4:30) and denies the plain fact that Jesus’ offer of forgiveness of sins and eternal life is universal (John 3:16; 5:24; 6:47; Acts 16:31; Heb 2:9; 1 John 2:2). The Bible tells us that assurance is possible for the one who believes because the work of salvation is based upon the work of Christ on the cross and the promise of eternal life which His death and resurrection has secured for us.

The second problem is that both Calvinists and Arminians have equated spiritual deadness with physical deadness. Such an emphasis is placed solely upon the “inability” of man

to respond because “he is like a dead corpse” that they fail to think through the implications of this understand of what it means to be “dead” in trespasses and sins. Simply put, there are certain things that dead people can’t do. For instance, dead people cannot sin and since they cannot sin, they cannot be held responsible for sin. Try taking a corpse to court in hopes of winning the case. The judge would surely have you committed for suing a corpse because you cannot hold a corpse accountable. Dead bodies don’t suffer consequences.

Such conclusions do not stop the Calvinists from trying to make a coherent association between physically dead and spiritually dead people. “Before we are justified we are spiritually dead, and it is impossible for a corpse to do anything, let alone bring itself back to life. It is for that reason that justification by faith can only be a gift of God, freely given to us in spite of ourselves.” The misnomer in play is the false conclusion that responding in belief of the gospel message is a work that someone does. It is not. If being spiritually dead is the same as being physically dead (meaning completely unable to respond in any fashion), evangelism is pointless and the Great Commission was a waste of breath.

Finally, if mankind is unable to believe, there should be far less pleading, in fact no pleading at all, from God, Jesus, the Apostles, and the Prophets for those who are doing wrong to repent and for those who are unregenerate to believe (Matt 28:18-20; Acts 2:40; 3:19-26; 2 Cor 5:18-20). Yet the Bible pleads with sinful mankind over and over again! We even see Jesus getting frustrated with Nicodemus due to his lack of understanding when He says, “If I told you earthly things and you do not believe, how will you believe if I tell you heavenly things?” (John 3:12). Why didn’t Jesus simply tell Nicodemus that he wasn’t one of the elect, or chosen of God, or that he had simply not been regenerated yet, or that there was no gift of faith for him? Why not take confidence in what the Father had predestined? The answer is that this is not how God has orchestrated salvation. Such conclusions are not biblical.

The belief that a lost person needs “God’s enabling work in causing one to believe” causes Scriptural problems when we read that it is a lack of faith that is given as the only reason for people remaining lost (dead) in their trespasses and sins. For instance, in John 5:37-40, we read:

And the Father who sent Me, He has testified of Me. You have neither heard His voice at any time nor seen His form. You do not have His word abiding in you, for you do not believe Him whom He sent. You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life (emphasis added).

Why do we not see Jesus make the pronouncement that those who are not believing are not doing so because they have not been given the gift of faith?

Early in Paul’s conversion, he found himself in Jerusalem. While in a trance there, the Lord revealed something to him. “Make haste, and get out of Jerusalem quickly, because they will not accept your testimony about Me” (Acts 22:18b). The issue was not that they were unable to believe Paul’s testimony. It is that they were unwilling to accept it.

This is also seen in Romans 9:30-32a:

What shall we say then? That Gentiles, who did not pursue righteousness, attained righteousness, even the righteousness which is by faith; but Israel, pursuing a law of righteousness, did not arrive at that law. Why? Because they did not pursue it by faith, but as though it were by works (emphasis added).

Again, the reason is not because they were not elect or because they had not been given the gift of faith. The conclusion that Paul comes to is unbelief. Jesus points this out in Matthew 21:32 about John the Baptist and his message as the forerunner of the Messiah. The chief priests and elders knew this to be the issue due to their reasonings in verse 25 (See also Mark 11:31; Luke 20:5). These men refused to believe the testimony of John the Baptist about Jesus. All of the responsibility rested upon their shoulders. It was not because God had not enabled them to believe.

A Biblical View of Being “Spiritually Dead”

The above arguments are not meant to conclude that someone being spiritually dead is a negligible issue. It is of the most serious importance of which has cost the Son of God His life. Chafer writes:

The charge brought forward in this passage is not that men commit sin, which accusation few would deny; it is rather the more serious charge that men are dead in sin. That is, they are in the state of spiritual death which is caused by sin, and, because they are in that state, they can produce nothing but sin.

This is a truly helpless estate, rightly deserving the classification of “depravity.”

In the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve sinned (Gen 3:1-7). Adam and Eve’s sin resulted in spiritual death and ultimately physical death, both of which had not previously been known in the created world, but was something that God had made clear as a consequence for disobedience when initially giving the command to Adam to not eat of the fruit of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Gen 2:16-17). When Adam sinned, sin was now part and parcel of the human race because all humans are descendants of Adam and Eve. This is not solely in action, for sinful action proceeds from an internal, sinful constitution known as the sin nature (Rom 7:8), the flesh (Gal 5:19-21), or the old self (Rom 6:6). This leaves man in a truly destitute state. Again, we look to Chafer:

The fundamental character of sin may be defined as any transgression of, or want of conformity to, the character of God. All the present important classifications of sin—imputed sin, imparted sin, personal sin, and the judicial reckoning under sin—are traceable directly to the original act of sin on the part of the first sinner. Sin in its every form is exceedingly sinful, and that because of the fact that it is contrary to the character of God.

Sin permeates everything. Sin is highly destructive. Sin is not taken as seriously as it should be. Understanding the magnitude and force of sin in effecting our entire being and existence sets the stage for understanding the nature of being “dead in your trespasses and sins” (Eph 2:1). Baxter captures this perfectly:

The fundamental idea in death is not cessation, but separation. Physical death is the separation of the body from the soul. Spiritual death is the separation of the spirit from God. It means the absence of that highest life which was originally in man before sin divorced man’s spirit from God who is its life-giving environment. To pass from time into eternity thus dead toward God, alienated and separated from Him, is surely a dread enough thought to send us out with renewed concern for the saving of the Christless souls around us.

All were once in this hopeless estate. All of us were in desperate need of life everlasting. This is why the gospel must be shared. People must hear the truth of the death and resurrection of God’s Son.

Knowing the urgency surrounding the sharing of the gospel we must observe that at no time are we taught in the Bible that sin has incapacitated the human being from responding to the Word of God. Note the following verses:

“So faith comes from hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.” –Romans 10:17

“In the exercise of His will He brought us forth by the word of truth, so that we would be a kind of first fruits among His creatures.” –James 1:18

“Since you have in obedience to the truth purified your souls for a sincere love of the brethren, fervently love one another from the heart, for you have been born again not of seed which is perishable but imperishable, that is, through the living and enduring word of God.” -1 Peter 1:22-23

God makes us alive by His own power when we hear the preaching of the gospel (Eph 2:5). This is the only biblical means of calling the unregenerate person to faith. If faith is a “gift” that God only gives to some, then humans should no longer bear any responsibility whatsoever to believe the message of Jesus Christ on the cross for their sins.

Along the same lines, if God has only chosen some to be saved, then those not chosen cannot be held culpable for something that they never had the capacity to do. Those who argue for the idea of “total inability” often do so to protect the sovereignty of God, but the fact that every human being has had their sins paid for (1 Tim 2:6; Heb 2:9; 1 John 2:2), the fact that God desires for all men to be saved (1 Tim 2:4), and the fact that everyone is personally responsible to believe in the Lord Jesus Christ does not infringe upon, nor diminish, the sovereignty of God. He is still all-powerful.

One passage that many look to for the concept of “total inability” is Romans 3:9-18 where Paul quotes a series of Old Testament passages pertaining to the constitution of mankind. It reads:

What then? Are we better than they? Not at all; for we have already charged that both Jews and Greeks are all under sin; as it is written,

“There is none righteous, not even one; There is none who understands,

There is none who seeks for God; All have turned aside, together they have become useless;

There is none who does good, There is not even one.

Their throat is an open grave, With their tongues they keep deceiving,

The poison of asps is under their lips; Whose mouth is full of cursing and bitterness;

Their feet are swift to shed blood, Destruction and misery are in their paths,

And the path of peace they have not known.

There is no fear of God before their eyes.

Paul is proving from Scripture that “all, both Jews and Greeks, are under sin” (Rom 3:9). What is not stated in this passage is that human beings are unable to believe or respond to the gospel. While no one on Earth seeks after God, and to this we would readily agree, this does not mean that people do not respond to God when He brings the gospel to them. Niemela writes:

The difference between seeking and responding is huge. Paul categorically states that unbelievers do not seek God. They are not the initiators of reconciliation toward God. God seeks and God initiates. The fact that man does not initiate seeking toward God does not negate the idea of unbelievers responding to God’s seeking of them.

We know that God “draws” all men because Jesus states this clearly. In John 12:32, He says, “And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all men to Myself,” to which John provides a comment so that we do not misinterpreting what Jesus meant. He states in 12:33 that “He was saying this to indicate the kind of death by which He was to die.” At the cross, Jesus is lifted up. At the cross, Jesus draws all men unto Himself. The idea of “all not really meaning all” cannot be substantiated here. Jesus draws everyone. The Scriptures are clear.

So what about the problem of sin? In the person of Jesus Christ, the detriment that Adam’s choices brought upon the human race has found a divine resolve. The Apostle Paul paints this picture clearly and provides the reader with a well-ordered defense that leads to a universal offer of salvation due to all of the human race having the capability to respond to the gospel when they hear it (Rom 10:17). Author Dave Hunt writes:

Salvation, however, is not by sinners doing good works or freeing themselves from sin. Salvation is a free gift of God’s grace received by faith in Christ. And that is why we cannot agree that ‘fallen man is unable to come to Christ.’ Coming to Christ is simply believing on Him. The invitation, ‘Come unto me’ is given to all who under sin’s burden are ‘weary and heavy laden.’

Reading through the Scriptures, one would plainly see that God is repeatedly reaching out to the human race in order to reconcile them unto Himself. He has done so through the substitutionary death of Jesus Christ (John 12:32) and He has sent forth His Spirit to convict the world of sin, righteousness, and judgment (John 16:8-11). Even in the Old Testament, a chapter like Ezekiel 18 clearly demonstrates that the Lord lays a choice before Israel, of which they have the option to choose. While one choice is obedience and the other is disobedience, it does not change the fact that it is a choice, and a choice that for those who make it are personally responsible for, which includes the consequences (whether good or bad) for that choice.

Practical Applications

John the Baptist called people to “Make ready the way of the Lord, Make His paths straight” (Matt 3:3)! We receive interpretation about this from Paul when he states that “John baptized with the baptism of repentance, telling the people to believe in the one who was to come after him, that is, Jesus” (Acts 19:4). John’s push for repentance was so that the people would remove the things that were immoral and defiled from their lives and consciences and believe in the Christ when He came on the scene. John was calling unsaved people to turn from their sin so that they would have a greater sensitivity to the Messiah when He appeared. If those who are unregenerate are unable to respond to God, why would John waste his time doing this? Why would Paul confirm it?

Calvinists would say, “Because he didn’t know who was elect, so he preached to everyone,” while the Arminian would say, “because all can believe, but they may not be able to keep their salvation once that have it.” But when we look to the Bible, we would see that John preached like this because he knew that by repenting of immoral and depraved behavior before the Messiah’s arrival, the people that he had preached to would have a better possibility in responding to the Gospel message when the Messiah appeared. After all, it is Satan who blinds the minds and hearts of unbelievers. Paul writes, “And even if our gospel is veiled, it is veiled to those who are perishing, in whose case the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelieving so that they might not see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2 Cor 4:3-4).

It is obvious in reading the Scriptures plainly that people are indeed unable to save themselves in any way, shape, form, or by any deed, but they are not unable to believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ. We must be clear in our presentation of the saving message, which is something that even Paul prayed for (Eph 6:19-20; Col 4:3-4). Simple, biblical clarity is vital in communicating the substitutionary death and glorious resurrection of Jesus Christ to those who are unregenerate. Charlie Bing writes:

God's invitation to be saved through the gospel is a sincere and legitimate offer only if any and every person can believe it. If God must regenerate people before they can believe the gospel, then the invitation is not really to all people, but only to those already born again. But this is contrary to biblical statements that the gospel is for all (John 3:16; 2 Cor 5:19-20; 1 Tim 2:3-6; 1 John 2:2). Just as Paul preached everywhere with the assumption that anyone could respond to the gospel (Acts 20:21), we also should share the gospel with everyone (Matt 28:18-20; Mark 16:15; Acts 1:8) because it is a genuine offer to everyone. God regenerates anyone who believes the gospel.

By hearing the gospel that we preach, teach, and share, unbelievers can respond in faith and so be justified by God, receiving the complete and full forgiveness of their sins and the free gift of eternal life!

Conclusion

How should we understand one being “dead in trespasses and sins?” In a word: Biblically! Being spiritually dead is being eternally separated from God, a state that will only lead to damnation. Again, Bing provides an excellent summary:

It would be more biblical to take "dead in trespasses and sins" as a description of man's condition before God. Because of Adam's sin and man's relationship to Adam, man is totally separated from God and lacks anything that can commend him to God. Though sin's corruption extends to every man and all of his being, man retains the capacity to respond to God's initiative. Even after Adam sinned and died spiritually, he was able to talk with God immediately (Gen. 2:17; 3:1-19).

This realm of being separated from God is due to sin, and this is why sin must be seriously and decisively dealt with. God has chosen to deal with the problem of sin by issuing a blood payment for it on the cross of Calvary through the sacrifice of His eternal Son. While one is certainly depraved and cannot earn their own right standing before God, we do find that it is the sharing of the Gospel that prompts one to respond in faith (Rom 10:17; Jas 1:18; 1 Pet 1:22-23). Some will believe, some will not, but all need to hear!

Paul's Prayer for Greater Santification, Part 3- Ephesians 1:19-23

Ephesians 1:19-23

The third clause put forth by the apostle is: “and what is the surpassing greatness of His power toward us who believe.” The word “surpassing” is the Greek word hyperballō and is used four other times in the New Testament (2 Cor 3:10; 9:14; Eph 2:7; 3:19). BDAG defines this as “to attain a degree that extraordinarily exceeds a point on a scale of extent, go beyond, surpass, outdo.” Paul wants the saints to be intimately acquainted with the surpassing greatness of God’s power. “Greatness” means “magnitude,” but this word stands as a hapax legomena, being the only time it occurs in the New Testament. Simpson notes that this word can be used in relation to size, “but might be best understood as a quality.” Being the sole Divine Deity, Paul is speaking of nothing less than the highest grade of power which is stated as being “toward us who believe.”

Paul’s use of “power,” is used five times in this book alone and is found forty more times throughout the remainder of his writings. The word dunamis speaks to “the potentiality to exert force in performing some function,” which can be understood as God’s capability in a matter. Verbrugge states that it means the “ability to achieve” and is used commonly in the LXX in regard to military force. Succinctly put, God Almighty has the most awesome power and ability in existence. Let’s not forget that these three clauses fall under the category of a prayer that a local body of believers in Jesus Christ would be granted the developing quality of wisdom and unveiling (which is only possible spiritually, and therefore a work that can only be done by the Holy Spirit) in a deeper, accurate, precise, and mature knowledge of the Father. His power stands as something that we are desperately in need of being acquainted with, which makes illumination so vital. God’s power is a third of what it is in knowing Him more, deeply, in a way that leaves a lasting impression, redirecting the choices of life from earthly to heavenly. Paxson writes, “The power of which God speaks here is that which is inherently His as God; a power of surpassing, incalculable greatness which reveals the full strength of His might.”

This marvelous power of God is for those who qualify for it, namely, “toward us who believe.” Again, Paul includes himself with the personal pronoun, making this an equal and unified point. It is available to everyone who is “in Christ.” Now, does this mean that the surpassing ability of God has been demonstrated toward believers, or does it mean that those who are “actively believing” are privy to this “surpassing greatness of His power?” I believe that it is applicable to both. When we believe in Christ, we are responding to the presentation of the gospel, namely, our need for a Savior due to the fact that we are helpless sinners that are beyond any other remedy of rescue. At that moment, the power of God “makes us alive” (Eph 2:5) which is something that could never be accomplished apart from God. This wonderful truth stands in the “justification” category and is an undeniable fact. Every person needs the power of God to save them, and it is only God’s power that can save them.

However, in living the Christian life, it is only right to understand that the power of God is seen in greater manifestations for those who are walking in obedience with the faith. Those believers who are holding on to unconfessed sin are not currently in fellowship with God, even though they are still in a permanent and unbreakable relationship with Him. Keep in mind that Paul is writing in regards to blessings that the Church already has simply because they (we) are “in Christ.” Paul’s prayer is that we would come to grips with these fantastic truths, and to do so, we must call upon the Holy Spirit to reveal these things to us, for it is His work. Paul knows from revelation and experience that the deeper that one comes to know God, the greater their steadfastness in hard times, their trust in God’s will when the situation is bleak, and the eternal Hope that carries the believer above and beyond this temporal realm.

Beal and Radmacher write, “If we have become personally acquainted with Jesus Christ, if we know Him with the knowledge Paul is writing about, then we will also experience the power of God in our lives.” Much of American Christianity has been neutered into emotionalism that uses feelings as a gauge for the Lord’s will, but this is not where the Scriptures lead. It is the mind renewed by doctrine, asking for the Spirit’s involvement in illumination that restructures the value system of the believer, elevating them to new heights as they submit to each step revealed.

Finishing verse 19, we read that this is “in accordance with the working of the strength of His might.” With “working,” we have energeia (“energy”) which has an understanding of “the operating activity in some task,” while “strength” is kratos meaning “power exercised in resistance and control (6:10);” and “might” is “ischys, used of bodily strength and muscular force, is inherent, vital power (6:10).”

This means that His power toward believers in Christ has a measurement that has been put on display so that Paul’s readers will know exactly what he is talking about. Paul desires that we should fully affirm and understand the surpassing magnitude of God’s ability toward believers which He operates with precision and force. He wants believers to understand and experience the multi-faceted dimensions of God’s incredible strength and capabilities. This power is a carefully exercised reality that was executed in a worldwide, distinguishable manner that has yet to be disproved- the resurrection and ascension of Jesus Christ.

With the heart of a pastor, McCalley notes that,

When New Testament writers wish to express the greatness of God’s love, they point to the death of Christ (Rom 5:8); but when they wish to express the greatness of His power, they point to His resurrection and exaltation into the place of highest authority. And it is very important that believers should understand this power because it is also the power that works within us (Eph 3:20). The believer needs to know the resources at his disposal. The power available is not a bubbling stream but a surging river of life capable of sweeping away all things that would hinder its flow. Paul prays that he himself might come to know Christ and the power of his resurrection (Phil 3:10). It is not the power of a clenched fist but that of a pierced hand that rules the universe.

This magnificent power is identified as the power “which He brought about in Christ, when He raised Him from the dead and seated Him at His right hand in the heavenly places” (“heavenlies”- Eph 1:20). This is very much resurrection power, but we should not dismiss the fact that this is also ascension power, with Christ being seated at the right hand of the Father.

It is the same power that God demonstrated in raising Christ from the grave that is the same power that He uses to raise us from the grave of our sin nature into a newness of Life, which is both eternal and abundant (John 10:10b; Rom 6:4). It is also the same power that He will exert is raising our physical bodies at the Rapture if we pass away before He calls us Home (1 Thess 4:15-16). I once heard a pastor say that when Christ walked out of that tomb, we walked out with Him! What a glorious truth; a truly liberating thought! Paul wants for the Church to be taken deep into the precise knowledge of God’s phenomenal power, the resurrection power that God has worked, and will work, in us. Grasping this brings confidence and change to how we spend our time on Earth.

The second aspect to this power that God demonstrated in Christ is ascension power. Many passages speak of Christ’s ascension to the right hand of the throne of God in the heavenlies (Matt 22:44; 26:64; Mark 16:19; Acts 2:33; 5:31; 7:55-56; Col 3:1; Heb 1:3; 8:1; 10:12; 12:2; 1 Pet 3:22). This act of power is part and parcel of the fact that He has been given the Name which is above every name (Phil 2:9b). It is a place of high esteem, befitting of One who is deserving honor and praise. It is the “on deck” position of the coming King of YHWH who will assume the throne at the proper time and reign in unprecedented glory for 1,000 years (Rev 20:2-7). Jesus’ ascension it the connecting point between His perfect, salvific work on Calvary and His coming administration of earthly dominance. Let us not be tempted to think that this is a “power similar to that” or a “power like that,” but it is the exact power that has accomplished these things in the Person of Christ that is now toward the saint of God. This is another blessing of the “in Christ” reality.

Now there are some “explanations” that have sought to dismiss the ascension of Christ as the apostles physically saw it. Some may claim a pact that devised a lie to be promoted and some may claim that all of them saw an apparition, but Jesus ascended bodily into Heaven and is seated at the right hand of God (Acts 1:9-11). Chafer writes:

Not only has He left the tomb and returned to His native place, but He is exalted above all others, with all authority in heaven and on earth committed to Him; yet His humanity is present too. There is a man in the glory. His glorified humanity is retained forever.

Such is the historical record. Jesus ascends bodily before the eyes of the apostles (Luke 24:41-51; Acts 1:9). The call to Thomas to place his hand in the Lord’s side and to touch the nail prints in his forearms show a tangible Christ (John 20:27). Notice the importance of this fact from Philippians 3:20-21.

For our citizenship is in heaven, from which also we eagerly wait for a Savior, the Lord Jesus Christ; who will transform the body of our humble state into conformity with the body of His glory, by the exertion of the power that He has even to subject all things to Himself.

Note that the physical body of the believer undergoes a transformation when the Lord comes for His own at the rapture. This is “into conformity with the body of His glory.” There is no indication that this is a “spiritual” body but would be plainly understood as a physical one. Also, such a transformation is “by the exertion of the power” that is used for the subjection of all things under the authority of Christ. Additionally, it must be observed that at no time between the post-resurrection appearances and the ascension do we find any change in makeup or matter regarding Jesus. He is now, bodily, sitting at the right hand of the Father, scars and all, awaiting the time to establish His earthly Kingdom.

Both resurrection power and ascension power are one in the same as they are both manifestations of physical realities that convey a spiritual reality that has already happened (Rom 6:3-4; Eph 2:6) and guarantees a future physical reality that the saints are awaiting (John 14:3-4; 1 Cor 15:51-57; 1 Thess 4:13-18; 2 Pet 3:13). This is one facet of what is meant when referring to the omnipotence of God.

The subject of the power of God is worth pause and pondering. In the Old Testament, the power of God was usually expressed when God was referred to as the Almighty. We would possibly be familiar with the term El Shaddai (Gen 17:1) which means “the Almighty God.” God has demonstrated His power in the resurrection and ascension of Christ, not only for believers (for the purpose of giving hope- 1 Cor 15:20-28), but also as a testimony to the entire world and all of known history. We see the profound nature of this testimony from the Jewish historian Josephus who writes:

Now, there was about this time Jesus, a wise man, if it be lawful to call him a man, for he was a doer of wonderful works—a teacher of such men as receive the truth with pleasure. He drew over to him both many of the Jews, and many of the Gentiles. He was [the] Christ; (64) and when Pilate, at the suggestion of the principal men amongst us, had condemned him to the cross, those that loved him at the first did not forsake him, for he appeared to them alive again the third day, as the divine prophets had foretold these and ten thousand other wonderful things concerning him; and the tribe of Christians, so named from him, are not extinct at this day.

As far as we know, Josephus never became a believer in Jesus Christ. However, we see that despite his unbelief, he still documented the power of God being exercised in the person of Jesus Christ through the event of the resurrection. Josephus’ testimony is recorded as a historical event, emphasizing the uniqueness of the Lord Jesus and His rising from the dead.

A final point in regard to the “power” under consideration is that it is supernatural. This should not be overlooked. This power is God’s power, and never ours. Nor does His power need our power to compliment or complete it in order for its effectiveness to be secured or ensured. The power that Paul desires for his readers to know intimately is only God’s power, and it alone. It is pure power in its purest form. It is perfect power because it is divine. It is power that is tempered in its exercise by goodness only because God is good. He alone chooses how to utilize His power. To expect something other than God’s power in our situation is to presume that something else is needed and that it alone is not sufficient. Can we see the unbelief that easily boils to the surface when we are faced with a matter where our power has been seen to be insufficient time and time again? Paul understands that in order for the Christian to intimately know the power of God, they must be taken deeper in their thoughts about Him and their experience with Him so that they will become increasingly dissatisfied with self and self-power.

Watchman Nee explains:

For God's way of deliverance is altogether different from man's way. Man's way is to

try to suppress sin by seeking to overcome it; God's way is to remove the sinner. Many

Christians mourn over their weakness, thinking that if only they were stronger all would

be well. The idea that, because failure to lead a holy life is due to our impotence,

something more is therefore demanded of us, leads naturally to this false conception of

the way of deliverance. If we are preoccupied with the power of sin and with our inability

to meet it, then we naturally conclude that to gain the victory over sin we must have more power. `If only I were stronger', we say, `I could overcome my violent outbursts of

temper', and so we plead with the Lord to strengthen us that we may exercise more self-control.

But this is altogether wrong; this is not Christianity. God's means of delivering us

from sin is not by making us stronger and stronger, but by making us weaker and weaker.

That is surely rather a peculiar way of victory, you say; but it is the Divine way. God sets

us free from the dominion of sin, not by strengthening our old man but by crucifying him;

not by helping him to do anything but by removing him from the scene of action.

For years, maybe, you have tried fruitlessly to exercise control over yourself, and

perhaps this is still your experience; but when once you see the truth you will recognize

that you are indeed powerless to do anything, but that in setting you aside altogether God has done it all. Such a revelation brings human self-effort to an end.

We see this in Scripture. In 2 Corinthians 12 the Apostle Paul relates his experience in being “caught up to the third heaven” (12:2b). To keep him from boasting, he is given a “thorn in the flesh” (12:7b). Though he prays for its removal, he receives an answer from the Lord:

“My grace is sufficient for you, for power is perfected in weakness” (2 Cor 12:9b).

This leads Paul to reply:

“Most gladly, therefore, I will rather boast about my weaknesses, so that the power of Christ may dwell in me” (2 Cor 12:9c).

Paul used this unworldly and revolutionary truth to turn to boasting in his weaknesses. It is only when he is weak that he is truly strong. This truth is the same for you and I as believers in Christ. Our fullness of self will rob us of His divine working in our lives. Until we come to understand Him more, we will not cease to exalt self while pushing away every opportunity for Him to work. God’s power waits at the end of ourselves. We must be prepared to get out of His way every moment of every day.

It is Paul’s thought concerning the power of God in Christ’s ascension that moves forward in speaking of Jesus as being exalted above every “rule and authority and power and dominion” (Eph 1:21a). This list is much more than Paul simply waxing eloquent over Christ’s position in glory. Vincent explains, “These words usually refer to angelic powers; either good, as ch. 3:10; Col. 1:16; 2:10; or bad, as ch. 6:12; 1 Cor. 15:24; Col. 2:15; or both, as Rom. 8:38… Here probably good, since the passage relates to Christ’s exaltation to glory rather than to His victory over evil powers.” The power of God as exercised in the exaltation of Jesus Christ had dramatic results, which placed Jesus in the position of Supreme Ruler (Col 2:10). Alford notes that this “gives the highest and fullest expression of exaltation.” Jesus is the preeminent One (Col 1:18). The realm of His greatness goes beyond the here and now and stretches into all of eternity forward, into the ages. The obedience of Christ and the magnificent power of God opens the door for Jesus to be praised and revered forever.

There may be some rejection of the above concept, but it should be understood that Jesus Christ is perfectly God and has all power and glory attributed to Him in an undeniable fashion. This is something that He has because of Who He is and the relationship that He shares withing the Holy Trinity. However, His faithfulness in carrying out the payment for the sins of the world (1 John 2:2) is rewarded by a unique exaltation. Philippians tells us:

…although He existed in the form of God, did not regard equality with God a thing to be grasped, but emptied Himself, taking the form of a bond-servant, and being made in the likeness of men. Being found in appearance as a man, He humbled Himself by becoming obedient to the point of death, even death on a cross. For this reason also, God highly exalted Him, and bestowed on Him the name which is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee will bow, of those who are in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and that every tongue will confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father (Phil 2:6-11).

The obedience of the Lord Jesus to the point of His physical death has brought about an exaltation and recognition that was not previously (nor otherwise) possible.

Continuing with the scope of Jesus’ authority, Paul directs his readers to the fact that God has placed all things under His feet. This concept is related to Jesus’ sitting at the right hand of the throne of God and resembles what the psalmist writes in Psalm 110:1, “The Lord says to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand, until I make your enemies your footstool.’” This verse is quoted in the New Testament when speaking about the superiority of Jesus Christ (Acts 2:35; Heb 1:13) and was even used by Christ to confound the Pharisees (Matt 22:44; Mark 12:36; Luke 20:43). This concept clearly communicates the Lordship of Christ over all things, being a demonstration of the power of God. We can understand that this will not be a completed fact until He physically assumes the throne of David on Earth (2 Sam 7:8-16; Psalm 89:3-4; Zech 14:9; Luke 1:32-33; Rev 19:20-21). Everything is in place for this event to transpire, save the gathering of believers to Himself to serve as His viceroys in His coming administration (1 Cor 15:23, 50-56; 1 Thess 4:13-17; 5:1-11; Rev 20:4-6).

We also see that God the Father has granted God the Son the right to be the Head of the church. The metaphor for the body is used throughout Scripture is speaking about the Church (1 Cor 12:12-27; Eph 1:23; 5:23, 30; Col 1:24; 2:19) and Christ is always understood to be the Head of the Body (Eph 4:15; 5:23; Col 1:18; 2:19). In Ephesians 5:22-33, Paul states “This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church,” signifying the intimacy that the Head of the Church has with the Body, which is His Church. Jesus is the Supreme Lord of the Body of Christ and as the Body, the saints are to submit themselves to Him in all matters. The church has no other head, no other husband, and no other master. Because of His exalted position, we are to look to Him for all guidance in conducting our lives and especially the matters within the Church, “which is His Body” (Eph 1:23). Christ alone is the believer’s “wisdom from God, and righteousness and sanctification, and redemption” (1 Cor 1:30b).

“The fullness of Him who fills all in all” is interesting. Marshall states, “The last phrase is ambiguous and may equally mean that Christ is filled with the power of God. However the difficult language be understood, it enhances the omnipotent position and influence of Christ through whom God’s power is at work in the lives of believers.” The “fullness” of Christ is the Church, His Body. Speaking of being the “fullness,” this concept does not point to the idea of completing Christ. To say this would be to imply that Christ is incomplete and thus, lacking in some way that only the Church can fill. To understand “fullness” is to see that in and through the Church, Christ has placed His fullness. Just as God demonstrates His fullness in Christ (John 10:31; 14:9; Col 1:19) and God was thus manifested in the Person of Jesus Christ, so the Body is the passive recipient of the fullness of Christ, meaning that “the church now embodies, expresses, and mediates that glorious presence to the world.” This is in conjunction with our earlier observance of the voluntary submission of the Son to the Father (See notes under Eph 1:17-18). Robertson affirms this understanding when he writes:

All things are summed up in Christ (1:10), who is the πληρωμα [plērōma] of God (Col 1:19), and in particular does Christ fill the church universal as his body. Hence we see in Ephesians the Dignity of the Body of Christ which is ultimately to be filled with the fulness (πληρωμα [plērōma]) of God (3:19) when it grows up into the fulness (πληρωμα [plērōma]) of Christ (4:13, 16).

In Christ is the fulfillment of all things. As His Body demonstrates His fullness to the world, all things in the world will be reconciled to Him and through Him for all things are for Him (Rom 11:36; Eph 4:10; 2 Cor 5:17-19).

Paul’s prayer has given way to praise, as it should. The Christian who prays for the spiritual well-being of others will be privy to glimpses of the Lord’s greatness that will bring about doxology. Beal and Radmacher write, “The mighty power of Jesus should lead us to constant worship with the deepest astonishment, admiration, and awe. How amazing that we should be privileged to stand united to the one who has dominion over all and yet one with whom we enjoy a loving personal relationship.”

Paul’s prayer being transformed into a doxological outpouring speaks to the readers about what prayer should lead to. This section contains the essential elements of worship: It speaks of who God is and of what God has done. These are the only motivations for acceptable worship in this life, for God is the only One worthy of being praised. Here is a summary of Paul’s prayer and praise:

Who God is

- The God of our Lord Jesus Christ (1:17)

- The Father of glory (1:17)

- He can reveal more about Himself (1:17)

- He is a God who can enlighten the human heart (1:18)

- He has immeasurable power (1:19)

What God has done

- He has called all believers to a hope (1:18)

- He has given all believers an inheritance (1:18)

- He has used His resurrection power on believers in Christ (1:19)

- He has demonstrated His power in the resurrection and ascension of Christ (1:20)

- God has exalted Christ above all celestial beings (1:21)

- God has given Jesus a name that is greater than any other name forever (1:21)

- God has put all things under His feet (1:22)

- God has made Christ the Head of the Church (1:22)

Who God is and all that God has done deserves immediate praise!

Paul’s heart for these dear believers is that they would develop a deeper understanding of the Father through the enlightening work of the Spirit. His work of imparting wisdom and revelation would unfold greater heights of steadfastness in affirming their calling, inheritance, and the power of the Father toward them. “The basis upon which the Holy Spirit carries on the subjective work in the believer, is the objective truth of his eternal completeness in the Lord Jesus Christ: crucified, buried, risen and ascended.” Only “in Christ” and through His completed work are these things true and certain for all who believe.

This prayer is biblical, inspired of God, and is right to be upon the lips of every saint.

Paul's Prayer for Greater Sanctification- Ephesians 1:17-18

*Just a reminder that this blogging program will not allow me to post the footnotes for these lessons. Please know that all sources are cited and well documented, should you need a reference.

Ephesians 1:17-18

The contents of Paul’s prayer begins with an acknowledgement of God that not only identifies who He is, but also declares His majestic nature. Paul does not refer to God as the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, though that would be a true statement, but rather that God is “the God of our Lord Jesus Christ, the Father of glory.” Looking at this phrase, we should understand that the idea of submission is present. However, this should not lead us to see Jesus as less than God. Foulkes writes, “There is nothing in the expression which is contrary to his own sharing of the Godhead; for he could speak of the Father as ‘my God’ (Matt. 27:46; John 20:17).” Submission does not automatically imply inferiority. The submission of the Son, being His designation from all eternity, is modeling His hope for our submission to the Father as well. This is something that is seen all throughout Jesus’ earthly ministry, especially in the book of John. For instance, we see that Jesus would show His submission to the Father by stating such things as:

“My food is to do the will of Him who sent Me and to accomplish His work.” –John 4:34b

“For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. This is the will of Him who sent Me, that of all that He has given Me I lose nothing, but raise it up on the last day. For this is the will of My Father, that everyone who beholds the Son and believes in Him will have eternal life, and I Myself will raise him up on the last day.” –John 6:38-40

“If God were your Father, you would love Me, for I proceeded forth and have come from God, for I have not even come on My own initiative, but He sent Me.” –John 8:42

While these examples are brief, we see clearly that Jesus was subject to His Father, His God, in Heaven. God the Father, God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit are all equal in essence, existence, and authority, yet they each hold and fulfill different roles. The idea of submission here simply shows that there is an alignment in the roles that the Godhead utilizes in order to accomplish His divine will. In looking at 1 Corinthians 11:3, we read, “But I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a wife is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” Notice that the submission roles are restated here and even have a bearing in the human realm as well. Again, these submissive positions do not show inferiority, for just as the Son is not inferior to the Father, neither is the wife inferior to her husband. Yet, what we do see is an alignment that accomplishes the will of God.

The phrase “Father of glory” in an interesting title. McCalley writes:

The term Father of glory has no direct parallel anywhere else in Scripture. It bears some resemblance to “Lord of glory” (1 Cor. 2:8) or “King of glory” (Ps. 24:7). The genitive of glory stresses the characterizing quality of the Father. We could paraphrase for meaning by saying “the Father with whom glory is always present.”

Glory is God’s is goal. He is the only One deserving of such praise and honor, so much so that it is an inseparable part of Him. We would say that “He owns it,” in every sense, for apart from Him there is no true glory to be had or appreciated.

The first desire in Paul’s prayer is that God would grant his readers “a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the knowledge of Him” (1:17b). The word for “spirit” here is pneuma and is sometimes translated as “Spirit” speaking of the Holy Spirit (as in the NIV). Understanding pneuma as the Holy Spirit here is an interpretive liberty that comes into conflict when considering the fact that Paul has already explained that the Holy Spirit has previously “sealed” these saints (1:13) being the “down payment” for the inheritance that they are to receive (1:14). A better understanding would be that “spirit” speaks of something that would characterize the saint. Wuest speaks of this as being “a disposition or influence which fills and governs the soul of anyone.” Lenski understands this in a similar fashion as “a spiritual quality or, let us say, nature that is marked by wisdom and revelation.” The use of “spirit” speaks more to the concept of a mainstay in the life of the believer, a habit that is developed within us as we progress in our sanctification.

The words “wisdom” and “revelation” are important because of the subject of which these things are desired by Paul is a greater knowledge of God. With “wisdom,” we find that this word is sophia which we examined earlier in Ephesians 1:8 in speaking of the riches of God’s grace which were “lavished upon us in all wisdom and insight.” The question may naturally follow, why would Paul pray that our wisdom concerning God would grow if wisdom is something that we have already been blessed with completely in Ephesians 1:8? We could easily compare the two and see that 1:8 deals with the subject of “the riches of His grace,” while 1:17 deals with a knowledge of God Himself, and this would be a satisfactory distinction. But we should also think about what Paul desires to see accomplished for the believer by the blessing of God in having his prayer answered. Paul wants those in Christ to have a deeper insight according into the Person of the Father. This is the essence of Christian growth and the seedbed for meaningful worship.

This matter is a dire one. As Tozer observes:

The gravest question before the Church is always God Himself, and the most portentous fact about any man is not what he at a given time may say or do, but what he in his deep heart conceives God to be like. We tend by a secret law of the soul to move toward our mental image of God. This is true not only of the individual Christian, but of the company of Christians that composes the Church. Always the most revealing thing about the Church is her idea of God, just as her most significant message is what she says about Him or leaves unsaid, for her silence is often more eloquent than her speech. She can never escape the self-disclosure of her witness concerning God.

“Wisdom” in the realm of Theology Proper, being an intelligence applied in relation to Who God is, what He has done, and what He is like is the bare basis for all genuine change that may occur in one’s life. This is the sole subject that strips one’s pride, bends the knee, and unfolds the heart. It makes one malleable and useful in the plan of God because it evacuates the small confidences in “self.” It is hard to see how there could be a great request made of God by one of His dear children. It is more of Him, and less of all else.

Paul’s use of “revelation” is the word apokalupsis meaning “making fully known.” Commonly this word has been related to the book of Revelation, which uses the same word, carrying the meaning of “unveiling” or “uncovering.” Hoehner describes the concept of “revelation” as “some hidden thing or mystery of God that is unveiled by God and cannot be discovered by human investigation.” This is something that God must “unlock” for us to get a proper view. Paul understands that the thinking of the saint must be changed before the actions of the saint will seek to follow the renewed mind and its new mental pathways which are now according to truth (Rom 12:2; Col 1:9-12). “Spiritual truth,” Clough writes, “must be illuminated to the conscience in order for knowledge and belief to occur.” Both insight and revelation are spiritual qualities that are positioned around the “knowledge of Him” in Ephesians 1:17b. This is what Paul is asking for on behalf of the congregation.

The implications surrounding Paul’s use of “knowledge” is deserving of our undivided attention. This word is epignōsis and occurs twenty times in the New Testament with fifteen of those being penned by the Apostle Paul, and the remaining five occurring in the General Epistles. Epignōsis has become a topic of serious debate regarding its usage. Some commentators see this understanding as being nothing more than “knowledge” or “recognition” pertaining to God and/or Jesus Christ. This would not be much different from gnōsis which “refers to what is known or understood, either through experience, perception, or revelation.” But it is the prefix epi- that brings about the intentional difference that Paul and the other New Testament authors are seeking to convey. “The function of the prepositional prefix epi-, according to Lightfoot, is to intensify and hence it indicates ‘a larger and more thorough knowledge’ than gnōsis.” While gnōsis “generally conveys the idea of an experiential knowledge (the product of experiencing by living),” epignōsis takes this understanding to a heightened level. Melick notes that “the compound form heightens the definition. In Greek, prefixed prepositions may be either directive, pointing to a specific knowledge, or perfective, emphasizing an accurate knowledge.” Ultimately, the interpreter must seek to understand the inspired author’s intent at the time of writing.

Many other scholars have noted this marked difference as well. Louw and Nida have defined epignōsis as “to possess more or less definite information about, possibly with a degree of thoroughness or competence,” while Wuest sees this as a “knowledge that is true, accurate, thorough, full knowledge.” Lenski sees this as, “the knowledge which really apprehends God, true realization in the heart and not merely that of the intellect,” and Hoehner agrees that, “one acquires this knowledge of God not only by facts from the Bible but by the Holy Spirit’s giving insight and disclosure in the knowledge of God himself.” As with any word under consideration, the definition only tells part of the story. Does the context surrounding the use of epignōsis gives us the indication that the original author sought to demonstrate an intensified knowing of the Father that is “larger and more thorough?”

Examining the use of epignōsis in Philippians 1:9-11, we find another prayer of asking, the divine reason for such asking, and the power that accompanies this “knowledge.” Paul writes:

And this I pray, that your love may abound still more and more in real knowledge and all discernment, so that you may approve the things that are excellent, in order to be sincere and blameless until the day of Christ; having been filled with the fruit of righteousness which comes through Jesus Christ, to the glory and praise of God.

The NASB95 has seen fit to translate epignōsis as “real knowledge,” coupling it with the abounding of agape and “all discernment” (being the only use of this word in the New Testament). The reason put forward is that epignōsis and its surrounding qualities allow for an approval of excellent things, which will lead to the believer being sincere and without blemish for “the day of Christ,” which should be understood for the Christian as their presentation at the Judgment Seat of Christ (2 Cor 5:10). This is also understood out of v.11 with the connection between “real knowledge” and the believer “having been filled with the fruit of righteousness” which points to deeds being done in a spiritual fashion. MacDonald notes that v.10 should be connected to v. 6 which “refers to the Rapture and the subsequent judgment of the believer’s works.” Hence, this real knowledge and the results that should follow from it have a goal of greater glorification at the Lord’s Judgment Seat. Clearly, epignōsis is being used by the apostle in the context of sanctification and growth leading to greater glorification. This use upholds the understanding of epignōsis as an intensified, “full knowledge.”

A brief examination where Paul uses epignōsis should suffice to continue making this case. In Colossians 2:2, the word is again translated as “true knowledge,” being surrounded by qualities of those who are already believers in Christ, namely that their hearts are knit together in love, and that they have the wealth that comes from a full assurance of understanding. These are not characteristics of unbelievers. This “true knowledge” is in “God’s mystery, Christ Himself.” Therefore, we see a deeper, intimate knowledge of Jesus Christ, seeing that they have come to a full assurance of understanding, for the believers who are in Laodicea (Col 2:1). In addition, Colossians 3:10 finds Paul instructing his recipients on godly living. He notes that the “new self” (see also Eph 4:24) is being renovated to an epignōsis in accordance with the image of God. Again, the apostle is encouraging growth truths in an accurate and intimate knowledge for these believers in Christ.

From the examples and discussion provided, it is clear to see that Paul’s use of epignōsis is meant to convey a deeper, first-hand, and even experiential knowledge that is spiritually wrought in the believer. Unless otherwise stated (as in Rom 1:28), these instances are largely found in connection with the greater growth of those who are already believers in Christ. Knowing what epignōsis is from a biblical perspective, we can now examine how this occurs, which is answered by the Apostle Paul in Colossians 1:9-12. It reads:

For this reason also, since the day we heard of it, we have not ceased to pray for you and to ask that you may be filled with the knowledge of His will in all spiritual wisdom and understanding, that you will walk in a manner worthy of the Lord, to please Him in all respects, bearing fruit in every good work and increasing in the knowledge of God;

strengthened with all power, according to His glorious might, for the attaining of all steadfastness and patience; joyously giving thanks to the Father, who has qualified us to share in the inheritance of the saints in Light.

Notice the progression. Paul’s prayer is for the Colossian believers to be filled with the epignōsis of the Father’s will in “all spiritual wisdom and understanding” (v.9b). This results in three things. First, walking in a manner that is considered “worthy of the Lord” (v.10a). Second, the believer will please the Father in all respects (v.10b). Finally, the believer will bear fruit (v.10c). With the occurrence of these three things, these Christians will grow in the epignōsis of the Father (v.10d). These are the bookends of epignōsis. Those qualities in Colossians 1:11-12 are the result of the bookends of epignōsis. The prayer of Paul for the Colossians to have a deeper knowledge of God is a deepening of doctrine and a honed accuracy that leads to a changed life, which results in a deeper more accurate knowledge. The similarities with Philippians 1:9-11 are evident.

Paul knows something that we easily forget: The more you know and understand about God, the more obedient and pleasing that you should be to God. We will never exhaust the riches of the Persons of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Therefore, His Word must be mined time and time again. He is the Creator of which we rest upon. He is the Provider and Sustainer of His people of which we look to. He is the God who speaks, of which we must listen intently. Paul’s desire is for the saints to grow deeper in their understanding and comprehension of all of who God is, because they have already had everything that they would possibly need for this growth provided to them (us) in Christ (Eph 1:3-14). The gracious gifts are freely provided but the spiritual knowledge needed to utilize such gifts is a matter of God’s revealing in the deeper things of Himself. This is profound grace that deepens the opportunities for our intimacy and fellowship with the Creator.

In Ephesians 1:18, Paul writes, “having the eyes of your hearts enlightened.” This phrase fits perfectly with the understanding of “spirit” being a “quality” in the believer’s life from 1:17. Phōtizō is the word for “enlightened” and deals with the removal of ignorance about something. It is known as the doctrine of illumination. This is something that can only be done by the Holy Spirit. To define the doctrine of illumination, it is the work of the Holy Spirit in bringing believers in Christ to a greater understanding of God through His Word. Enns writes, “At the moment of salvation the believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit who then takes the truths of God and reveals them (illumination) to the believer (1 Cor. 2:9–13). Since only God knows the things of God, therefore it is essential that the Spirit of God instructs the believer.” This explanation shows the connection between “enlightened” in v.18 and “revelation” in v.17. So, while the “spirit” in v.17 is that of a quality or characteristic that is developed in the believer and should not be confused with the Holy Spirit, it is the Holy Spirit who reveals, imparts wisdom, and illumines the child of God in the deeper, experiential knowledge of the Almighty. It should be concluded that this is very much the head, but also the heart. It is very much epignōsis, but also conviction that makes the proceeding choices and actions fall into great compliance with God’s will. One last note: Illumination should always be understood in conjunction with the words of Scripture, which stands as the means of God’s special revelation of Himself. This means that every Bible student would do well to ask for the Spirit’s illumination when approaching the Word of God for times of refreshing.

The phrase “the eyes of your heart” is different to say the least. The word for “eyes” is known as “mental and spiritual understanding” in BDAG, and the “heart” speaks of “the seat of thought and moral judgment as well as of feeling.” If we were to ponder upon this phrase, we would come to a sense that Paul wants the believer to have deep-seated convictions based on a greater knowledge of God and His wondrous power that would reach to the point of dictating daily decisions and molding future plans as a response to this knowledge. Or to put it another way, Paul desires for the “reality” that the believer accepts to be continually shifted based upon a continual revealing and cultivating that comes from knowing God through His Word. In this way, the “reality” that the enemy has (ultimately) painted in this world is replaced with the truth as derived from the Scriptures. Again, Paul understands that a believer’s thinking must be different in order for there to be a life change that is pleasing to the Lord and which is in alignment with His revealed truth. This is exactly the progression that we examined earlier in Colossians 1:9-10.

The “eyes of your hearts” being illumined in the “knowledge of Him” has three specific objects in view, and they are:

1. The hope of the Father’s calling (1:18)

2. The riches of the glory of the Father’s inheritance in the saints (1:18)

3. The surpassing greatness of the Father’s power toward all believers (1:19)

In these notes, we will look at two of these closely to understand more of Paul’s desire for the saints’ growth. The third area concerning God’s power will be expounded upon in the next section. All of these areas in view are pertaining to the Church (or believers) as a whole. This is not an area of individual blessing, but rather commonly-received blessings that are anything but common. As Robertson states, “When the Holy Spirit opens the eyes of the heart, one will be able to see all these great truths.”

1. The hope of the Father’s calling (1:18)

Ephesians 4:4 says “There is one body and one Spirit, just as also you were called in one hope of your calling.” If we read the context of this verse we would see that Paul is speaking about the unity that all believers share in Christ. There is one body, one Spirit, one Lord, one faith, one baptism (4:5), one God and Father of all (4:6), and only one call (4:4). Hoehner writes,

“The first fact to be ascertained pertains to the past. A believer’s present hope has its source in the past when he was called (cf. Rom. 1:6; 8:30; Eph. 4:1, 4; 2 Tim. 1:9) to salvation. ‘Hope’ in Scripture is the absolute certainty of a believer’s victory in God (cf. Rom. 8:23–24; Eph. 4:4; Col. 1:5; 1 Thes. 1:3; 1 Peter 3:15).”

Are we settled on the understanding that eternal life is forever, guaranteed life? Do we grasp the “hope” of our certain glorification with Him? Ephesians 1:3-14 is clear that we already possess these wonderful things, but we are often without understanding in the things that we freely possess from the Father. Our assurance in this matter is paramount, being a vital stepping stone in the path to maturity, for the believer cannot and will not grow in their walk with Christ if they are always uncertain about their secured future. Instead of thriving, their earthly lives will be lived in hopes of securing the favor of God because they are unsure of whether or not they have it. This outlook not only denies the free grace of God toward the believer in Christ but stands in doubt of the clear teaching of His Word in that all who believe in Him have eternal life (John 6:47).

2. The riches of the glory of the Father’s inheritance in the saints (1:18)

The word for “inheritance” must be considered here in this passage, especially concerning its usage in the rest of the New Testament. As of first importance, we must remember that the word used for “inheritance” here is not the same as found earlier in 1:11 (see notes there). Every use of the word kleronomia in the New Testament deals with someone other than God receiving an inheritance. We see this in the parable that Jesus told about the tenants (Matt 21:38; Mark 12:7; Luke 20:14), the man having the dispute over their inheritance with his brother in Luke 12:13, Stephen’s description of Abraham being called to the Promised Land (Acts 7:5), which is also referred to by the author of Hebrews (Heb. 11:8). We also find that inheritance is apart from the law (Gal 3:18), that inheritance can be referring to a future reward (Acts 20:32; Col 3:24), the “eternal inheritance” that has been provided by Christ’s death (Heb 9:15), which has been laid up for the saints (Eph 1:14; 1 Pet 1:4), and even something that can be forfeited due to ongoing sin in the believer’s life (Eph 5:5), so much so that it costs them their inheritance in the coming Kingdom of Christ. However, not one of these instances speaks to God receiving believers as His inheritance.

We do see instances in the Old Testament where Israel is designated as God’s “heritage” or “portion” (Deut 4:20; 26:18; 32:8-9), but we do not see this type of relationship with the Church. Lenski writes, “The solution is not that we are here called God’s inheritance; here, in v.14, and throughout the New Testament the word kleronomia always means the inheritance intended for us.” In looking at the verse, we would quickly notice that it says “the riches of his glorious inheritance in the saints” (emphasis added). Lenski explains that this word “is quite often used with persons and refers to what is mentioned as pertaining to them: ‘in their case.’” In other words, God has a richly, glorious inheritance in the case of the saints, meaning that the saints are the ones receiving this incredible inheritance.

If the first area of understanding in 1:18 was the hope that the saints have been called to, meaning the hope of certain glorification through Christ, then this second area of understanding is a progression to the inheritance to be received in that hoped-for future; one that is rich and glorious, and goes beyond simply that of Heaven. It is abundant in nature and is found to have been made available to all of the saints. Paul’s prayer calls upon the Holy Spirit to open the now-believing eyes that are still blinded with the remnants of dead flesh to the astounding reality of the Church who has been born again into a Newness of Life. It is only by better understanding what is out ahead that we can suffer through what is here below. By simply being content with the here below, we discredit and defame the Name above all names, because we do not live presently in the Life that He has supplied abundantly. Our earthly lives are supernatural testimonies of heavenly realities that have been given freely by the death and resurrection of Jesus Christ. While God profoundly loves His children and provides for them (John 1:12; 3:16), there is no Scriptural evidence that we are an inheritance to Him at the culmination of time. We are already His possession in Christ, for we have been bought with a price (1 Cor 6:20).

While we cannot possibly capture in print what the birth inheritance of the saints will be, we know that Paul’s thrust here is for the Church to grow in their knowledge of Who God is and all that He has in store for them (us). He desires for the Church to live like redeemed people, but in order to do this, we must think according to the reality that Christ has secured for us. I believe that Paul understands the far-reaching implications of 1) the power of prayer and how reliance upon it will accomplish infinitely more than we ever could on our own, and 2) that a deeper understanding of these things that have already been made available to the saints will have a lasting effect upon the influence of the Church in this world.

If life in this world is anything, it is uncertain.

Jobs are not certain; they could be taken or lost at any moment.

Parents are not certain; they could die at any moment, or just simply let you down.

Money is not certain; just ask the Federal Reserve and the depression of October 29, 1929.

Friends are not certain; high school, Facebook, and texting will make sure of that.

Athletics are not certain; you are only one step away from an ACL surgery.

Academics are not certain; someone always knows more, and they are not always right.

Recreation is not certain; because we will become dissatisfied with the game in one way or another.

Family isn’t certain; because grudges run deep, and sibling rivalry is a reality.

Fame is not certain; because the road passes through a wasteland.

Your spouse isn’t certain; because marriage is hard and not every couple fights to stay on the same page.

Your town isn’t certain; because your reputation can be tarnished.

Your “downtime” is not certain; because they just came out with Xbox 43.

Your body is not certain; because the longer that it goes, the more that it fails!

Only Christ is certain. Only Christ lasts. When Heaven and Earth pass away, only His Word will remain (Matt 24:35). Only Truth will last because only Truth is true. Paul wants the Church to know Truth; to be saturated in Truth. He wants the Word of Christ to dwell richly in us (Col 3:16). He desires us to seek Him with our whole hearts and store up His Word in them so that we will not sin against Him (Psalm 119:10-11). Christ died to make this possible and Paul prays that God would reveal to us the plentitude of all that has been made available to those who are “in Christ.”

How does all of this fit together?

In 1:3-14, we find that there are many blessings, in fact “every spiritual blessing in Christ,” that we have received, to which Christ has secured by his death and resurrection. All of these blessings have been freely given to us. This is grace! With Paul’s prayer starting in 1:16, we find that he calls upon God to grant the Body of Christ with a “spirit” (characteristic, quality) of “wisdom” and “revelation in the knowledge of Him” (1:17). Just because the saints have been fully blessed by God does not mean that the saints are completely knowledgeable of the depths of these free blessings, nor do they (we) have a developed understanding of our God and Savior who both created all in existence, and who also desires a personal, highly-intimate relationship with each and every one of us (John 14:23-24).

Paul’s heart is for God to reveal to believers the “hope to which He has called you” and the “riches of His glorious inheritance” in the case of the saints. Both of these realms of understanding consist of things that have already been done for the believer in Christ, and are blessings that the believer already possesses. The magnitude of these blessings requires an increased awareness of the saints, which can only occur due to the illumination of the Holy Spirit so that we are able to comprehend the vast measure of all that these blessings entail.

Before moving forward, the question must be stated: Do we, as believers in the same Jesus as Paul, pray prayers like this? Is this what we ask of God? Do we come to Him and ask that the congregation of the local Body where we are committed would be filled with a spirit of wisdom and revelation in the deeper, experiential, accurate knowledge of the Father? DO we ask for His illumination over our time in His holy Word?

Should we consider that the things that are currently on our prayer lists actually pale in comparison with how we should be asking of the Lord? May the Spirit give us wisdom and revelation in these things to conform to His Word in a greater way.

Thanksgiving & Prayer- Ephesians 1:15-16

Paul’s Prayer for Greater Sanctification (1:15-23)

Ephesians 1:15-16

Paul begins this section with a reference back to all that he has just expounded upon in stating “for this reason.” Let’s briefly review the spiritual blessings from 1:1-14.

1. We are saints- 1:1 (also 2:19)

2. Blessed with every spiritual blessing in the heavenlies- 1:3

3. Chosen in Christ- 1:4

4. Chosen to be holy and blameless before Him in love- 1:4

5. Predestined to the adoption as sons- 1:5

6. Predestined according to the kind intention of His will- 1:5

7. Predestined to the praise of the glory of His grace- 1:5-6, 12

8. Recipients of His “freely bestowed” grace- 1:6

9. Redeemed through His blood- 1:7

10. Forgiven of our trespasses- 1:7

11. Forgiven according to the riches of His grace- 1:7

12. His grace has been lavished on us- 1:8

13. The mystery of His will in the dispensation of the fullness of times in which all things will culminate in Christ Jesus. It is the kind intention of His will to give us wisdom and insight into this matter- 1:9-10

14. We have a portion/lot given to us in Christ’s future administration/dispensation that was predestined for us 1:11

15. Sealed with the Holy Spirit of promise- 1:13

16. We are God’s possession, awaiting future redemption- 1:14

Each one of these blessings are now true of the one who has believed in Jesus because they are now located “in Christ.” This list is the substance in mind when the apostle writes “for this reason…” But we find that this is not the only motivation that pushes him to his next point in the letter, which is that of prayer. We also see that Paul has been made aware of both their faith in Jesus and their love for the saints. Their “faith” and “love” were famous, for they were the characteristics that this Body was known for! Therefore, it is important to look closely at each of these qualities.

“Faith” is the first characteristic here, which from the context, seems to point to something other than the fact that they have believed in Jesus Christ and now have eternal life. Paul’s use of the word does not pertain to their justification (which has already been mentioned in Eph 1:13), but rather to the exercising of their faith in their daily lives. It is not a forensic use, but a relational one. This local body was known for exemplifying faith and others have taken notice. This would be a trust “in the Lord Jesus” (for that is the object of faith) that stretches beyond normal, fleshly sensibilities. This was a mentality that announced their relationship with Christ was beyond that of superficial or even an infantile state. It was a trusting fellowship that had sprung out of their initial relationship with the Father. It was something that was developed and understood; a stalwart characteristic that even Paul (who was as far away as Rome) saw as something of great value among this congregation.

The second characteristic that had defined the reputation of his initial readers is that of “love.” This word has been excluded from some of the ancient manuscripts. However, in examining some of the formal equivalence translations, the NASB95, ESV, NKJV, HCSB, KJV, and NET Bible all contain the “love for all the saints” (NASB95) or something similar. “Love” is the Greek word agapē which has been previously mentioned at the end of 1:4. The fact that Paul mentions that he has “heard” of their love “for all the saints” (1:15) gives further reinforcement to the expressed understanding that being “holy and blameless before Him in love” (1:4) is a sanctification issue that is now able to be attained, and not something that was already presently abiding in the Ephesians (See notes on 1:4). While the recipients of this epistle were already attaining to faith and agapē in 1:15, the already-blessing in 1:4 is a statement of potential that existed for these believers. We may understand this better as the apostle recognizing an existing quality that was being well-cultivated in the Body of Christ, but his exhortation to them would not the call to taper off their affection or to keep the ship slow and steady, but to press on “all the more” (Phil 1:9; 1 Thess 4:1, 10).

The concept of agapē is understood as “affection, good-will, love, benevolence,” and is further mentioned as “especially of that love of Christians towards Christians which is enjoined and prompted by their religion, whether the love be viewed as in the soul or as expressed.” As with their “faith in the Lord Jesus,” their love also has direction in that it is being expressed “toward all the saints,” being their fellow believers in Jesus Christ, regardless of the church that they attend. Hoehner eloquently describes this when he writes that, “Paul heard of the Ephesians’ faith in Christ, their vertical relationship, and their love for all the saints, their horizontal relationship (cf. Col. 1:4; 2 Thes. 1:3). A proper relationship with God should lead to a proper relationship with other Christians.” Does not 1 John 1:6-7 come to mind?

If we say that we have fellowship with Him and yet walk in the darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth; but if we walk in the Light as He Himself is in the Light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus His Son cleanses us from all sin.

The mark of walking in the Light (vertical) is evidenced in our interpersonal fellowship with our brothers and sisters in the Lord (horizontal). This is a solid lesson considering the first command that Jesus hands down in the Upper Room Discourse (John 13-17). In it, He says:

A new commandment I give to you, that you love one another: just as I have loved you, you also are to love one another. By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another. –John 13:34-35

Agapē is the exact kind of love that Jesus had for His disciples and it is the kind of love that His disciples should seek to demonstrate to one another.

While both faith and love are characteristics that should mark those of the body of Christ, it must be stated that the mention of these qualities were not given so as to verify the authenticity of Paul’s audiences’ genuine conversion. This is not something that Paul in inquiring about, nor is he questioning. He believes that his recipients are “in Christ,” having already encouraged them as such (1:3-14). Such would be the same case in Colossians 1:3-4 where their faith in the Lord Jesus and their love for all the saints is of identical mention. This is not surprising with both epistles being written at the same time of Paul’s house arrest (Acts 28:11-31). We would do better to view Paul’s hearing of his recipients reputation as a mark of spiritual growth rather than an evidence of spiritual birth.

Moving into 1:16, we see that does not cease to give thanks for the saints. In reading any portion of the apostle’s work, one is guaranteed to come across a praise of thanksgiving unto God the Father. This concept is absent only in Galatians and the Pastoral Epistles. Paul was simply thankful for the saints that he had heard so much about. Their reputation preceded them, being one of faith and love, and such news caused our brother Paul to approach God often with gratitude for them. The word for “giving thanks” is the verb eucharisteō meaning “to show that one is under obligation,” and “to express appreciation for benefits or blessings,” with a third definition ascribed to it as simply “pray.” However, this third entry does not have any passages ascribed to it as a way that the word is possibly used in the New Testament. Other extant Greek sources have employed the word in this way, but Scripture does not. An explanation for this will be offered, but a continued examination of the word is necessary.

Eucharisteō will immediately catch the attention of those with a Catholic background, relating it to the familiar “eucharist,” which resulted from the word’s use in Luke 22:17, 19 in connection with the Last Supper, with the 2nd century leading to the adoption of the term for the practice. One who is familiar with Greek may notice the charis included within this word, commonly translated as “grace.” Robertson notes, “It is a common verb for giving thanks and was used also for ‘saying grace’ as we call it.” This observation sees “giving thanks” as prayer, but the text of Luke 22:17 (where his quote is from), does not state this explicitly. It is most certainly expressed gratitude to the Father over the subject at hand.

Do we respond like Paul when hearing of the abounding qualities of our brothers and sisters? Have we ever thought about giving thanks to God for believers in other local churches? There are many times in the life of a local Body that we find missionaries or other believers who are doing great things for the Lord in some part of the world. What about those churches that we have formed partnerships with or that we have been able to participate in ministry with in reaching people for Christ? What greater response could we possibly give for their involvement in our ministries than to give thanks for them before the Father? Those who seek to be obedient are guaranteed to suffer in the Scriptures (2 Tim 3:12-13). What greater encouragement could there be than to hear of their faithfulness (or in this situation, their love and faith) and to respond by giving thanks to God for their faithfulness? Giving thanks for faithful brethren should be a practice in every assembly because it is embedded in the fibers of every believer.

Paul’s coupling of the concepts of “giving thanks” and “prayer” are not uncommon in Scripture (2 Cor 1:11; Phil 4:6; Col 4:2; 1 Thess 1:2; 1 Tim 2:1; 2 Tim 1:3; Phlm 1:4). However, these are not one and the same thing, as examining each example will show. The subject of prayer is a conglomeration of many facets that would include the giving of thanks to God, confession of personal known sin, and adoration for His Person and provision. But each of these are things affixed to prayer, and not prayer itself. The same is true here in Ephesians 1:16. Hodge notes, “This does not mean, ‘praying I give thanks;’ but two things are mentioned—constant thanksgiving on their account, and intercession.” One is worship, while the other is our asking of God. This would explain why the third definition of eucharisteō had no biblical support in the New Testament for the its meaning being “pray.”

At this point in the text, it would be appropriate to pause and expound on the nature and substance of prayer. In Greek, it is the word proseuche which is understood as a “petition addressed to deity.” Prayer has simply been put as talking to God but the emphasis should concern the subject being address before the Lord. As John R. Rice has so perfectly stated it, “Praying is asking.” He writes:

There are two principle words in the Greek New Testament translated ask. One is the word eperotao, which means to ask, to inquire, as asking questions. But the word used about prayer is aiteo, which means to ask, to crave, to desire, to call for, always meaning asking for something. I have just counted about thirty times that this word is used about prayer in the New Testament. And it is properly translated ask.

Praying is the asking of something particular from God. It is coming to Him with our concerns, but always with the desire to see Him become actively involved in providing the solution. No doubt, God is always working, but it is our petitioning of Him for our own needs, or interceding for the needs of others that stand as true prayer. In those moments, we are asking. A familiar passage like Philippians 4:6 even shows us that “thanksgiving” is something that is to accompany the “prayer” (“asking”) to the Lord and “supplication” (urgency of the need) in regards to anxiety, petitioning (requesting) Him. Praying is asking. Looking to the Lord’s teaching on prayer and instructing the disciples on how to pray, Matthew 6:9-13 show us an address to the Father (v.9) and then a series of asking: 1. For the kingdom to come (v.10a), 2. For God’s will to be done on the Earth (v.10b), 3. Daily provision (v.11), 4. Forgiving the sin that we have incurred daily against God because we are forgiving those who have sinned against us (v.12), 5. That we would no be led into temptation, but rather delivered from the evil one (v.13a). He then closes with a doxology of praise to the Lord (v.13b). This instruction on prayer is centered upon asking. Praying is asking.

While there are many more examples (Jas 5:16-18 comes to mind), the Lord Jesus gives a pointed teaching in the Sermon on the Mount to His disciples in Matthew 7:7-11. The call is to ask, seek, and knock (v.7). On the surface, our English translations may have regulated this to what seems to be a one-time event. But this was not Jesus’ intention. Lenski explains, “The imperatives are present tenses, hence iterative: ‘go on again and again asking, seeking, knocking.’ The use of three verbs indicates intensity; and to seek is more fervent than just to ask, and to knock is still more fervent.” Each verb is durative. Continual asking, seeking, and knocking are the keys. Jesus proceeds in noting that when prayer is approached in this way there should be a sound and firm expectation of receiving that which was asked for. Jesus then provides two examples of asking from an earthly perspective between a father and a son (v.9-10). Jesus then concludes in stating that if those who are “evil” (base, worthless, degenerate) like the disciples are prone to give good gifts to their sons when they ask, the benevolent and merciful God of all glory will answer their repetitious requests with good and wonderful answers (v.11). Praying is asking, and repeated prayer that petitions the Father’s involvement should be equally met with an expectation of blessed results. He is good, and He will answer.

What is amazing in Ephesians, as well as the rest of Paul’s corpus, is the content of Paul’s prayers. Beal and Radmacher write that this prayer “expresses the most basic things a Christian ought to ask in prayer when interceding for other Christians.” Again, praying is asking. And we are encouraged to ask great things of a great God who can do all things (1 Kings 3:5; Matt 7:11; 21:22; Luke 11:13; Jas 4:2). Once we have read the next section, we will probably conclude that we simply do not pray like Paul. But we should also conclude that it would be to our benefit to examine the nature of Paul’s concern, seeking to incorporate his concepts in our personal prayer lives (also see Eph 3:14-21). We all have much to learn, and equally as much to correct in the contents of what we ask of the Father when we pray.